More stories

  • in

    Is VAR in use for FA Cup fifth round ties?

    THE FA Cup is heading towards the business end – and there are some huge names eyeing glory.Premier League giants Liverpool, Manchester United, Newcastle, Manchester City and Chelsea are all taking part in the fifth round.
    The use of VAR has been a controversial topic in the FA Cup this seasonCredit: Times Media Ltd
    Non-league Maidstone had their fairytale FA Cup run ended by Championship high flyers Coventry after Mark Robin’s men booked their place in the quarter-finals with a 5-0 win.
    Fellow second-tier sides Blackburn Rovers and Leicester City are both in action in the fifth round as they test themselves against Premier League opposition.
    But fans are confused if VAR will be in use for FA Cup fifth round ties.
    Is VAR in use for FA Cup fifth round ties?
    VAR will only be in use at Premier League grounds for FA Cup fifth round ties due to licencing rules.
    READ MORE IN FA CUP
    The prestigious competition has used VAR since 2018, when it was used in a trial format.
    However, it has only been used at Premier League grounds as the FA has never applied to the International Football Association Board (Ifab) for full use across all fixtures.
    It would be complicated and expensive to install VAR at some EFL and non-league league grounds, meaning it wouldn’t be a worthy investment for a one off tie.
    The FA has been criticised for creating an imbalance in sporting standards in the competition.
    Most read in FA Cup
    Responding to criticism last year, the FA said: “Video assistant referees provide match officials with additional support and should be utilised wherever possible.
    “However, only Premier League stadiums are currently licensed to use VAR due to the infrastructure, workforce and costs that are required.”
    Which FA Cup fifth round ties will have VAR in use?
    With just Premier League grounds allowed to use VAR, Bournemouth, Luton, Nottingham Forest, Chelsea, Wolves and Liverpool will all have it in use for their FA Cup fifth round ties.
    But the two games hosted by Championship sides – Coventry 5-0 Maidstone and Blackburn vs Newcastle will not have the technology enabled.
    Will there be replays for the FA Cup fifth round?
    FA Cup replays have become a huge part of English football’s most famous cup competition.
    And there have been extensive changes in recent years regarding whether they are included.
    In the 2020-21 and the 2021-22 seasons, all replays were scrapped due to fixture congestion.
    But they were brought back for the third and fourth rounds of the 2022-23 campaign.
    READ MORE SUN STORIES
    In the 2023-24 season, there were also replays for the third and fourth rounds.
    However, from the fifth round onwards, there will be no replays and matches that end in a draw will be settled on the night. More

  • in

    Chelsea boss Pochettino facing FA probe over claims officials ‘favour’ Liverpool ahead of Carabao Cup final clash

    CHELSEA boss Mauricio Pochettino faces an FA probe for his outburst about match officials favouring Liverpool.In the build-up to the Carabao Cup final against the Reds, Pochettino claimed on-field and VAR officials treated the Blues unfairly in the 4-1 defeat at Anfield on January 31.
    Mauricio Pochettino suggested his side were treated unfairly in their trip to Anfield last monthCredit: Reuters
    Chelsea claim they should have had a penalty for a foul on Conor GallagherCredit: TNT Sports
    Head coach Pochettino appeared to link the performance of referee Paul Tierney and his team to Kop boss Jurgen Klopp announcing a few days before that he would be leaving Liverpool at the end of the season.
    And the FA are set to study Pochettino’s comments to see if they merit a charge.
    Pochettino went to great lengths to make his point about Liverpool in his pre-final press conference in what could be regarded as an attempt to influence today’s referee Chris Kavanagh.
    The Blues boss said: “We need to be sure we are going to compete and be fair in every single decision.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    “When we played Liverpool at Anfield, not one key decision was for us. Two penalties were not given.
    “Duels, 50-50s, always red. I want to be treated in a fair way.
    “I am the first to say Liverpool is amazing and Klopp is one of the best coaches in the world.
    “But after my last experience playing there, what I want is to play a game at the same level and the best team wins.
    Most read in Football
    CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERS
    “We want both clubs to be seen in the same way.”
    And when asked if Chelsea were playing the role of party poopers as Liverpool try to send off Klopp in style, Pochettino said: “No. We want to win because of Chelsea.
    Petr Cech questions decade-long Mauricio Pochettino tactic that risks ruining Chelsea key man
    “Of course Liverpool want to win. But please, not another party involved in the game will be part of the celebration that Klopp is leaving, no? That is important.”
    Chelsea were particularly furious that they were not awarded penalties at Anfield for fouls on Conor Gallager and Christopher Nkunku.
    Pochettino was unhappy that VAR did not intervene and ask Tierney to look again at his decisions.
    VAR will be used in today’s final for the first time in this season’s Carabao Cup.
    Pochettino said: “I am pro-VAR.
    “But the problem is always the same: who are the referees that are watching the TV and how we use VAR.
    “The system, the technology is not the problem. I think it helps.
    “The way it is used between the referees on the pitch and the referees in the room, that is the key.
    “Sometimes the same situation brings a different decision. That is the difficult thing for coaches to accept, and the fans.”
    Pochettino was able to see the funny side about what happened last time he faced Klopp and Liverpool in a showpiece game.
    The Argentine led Spurs to the 2019 Champions League final, only for referee Damir Skomina to award a controversial penalty against Tottenham’s Moussa Sissoko for handball in the opening minute.
    Uefa had introduced VAR to their flagship competition for the first time in the 2019 knockout rounds, but the video officials saw no reason to overturn Skomina’s decision.
    Pochettino laughed as he said: “Were we playing with VAR or without? Because the ball on Sissoko after 30 seconds was here [pointing to his armpit].
    “Today do you think they would give a penalty?”
    But Pochettino was not joking in his comments about the officials in Chelsea’s last meeting with Liverpool.
    READ MORE SUN STORIES
    Ironically, Klopp himself was charged with improper conduct for comments he made about Tierney after Liverpool’s 4-3 win over Tottenham last season.
    Klopp copped a two-match touchline ban and a £75,000 fine for accusing Tierney of being biased against the Reds. More

  • in

    Why football stars are scoring more penalties.. and the goalkeeper’s cheat code that could turn the tide

    VAR was supposed to end the controversy surrounding poor refereeing decisions in football. Instead, we have seen football slowed down with a myriad of replays and debates rage on the quality of officiating in the division.
    Penalties are being converted at record levelsCredit: The Times
    So how can goalkeepers tip the balance in their favour againCredit: Alamy
    How the Premier League five-year rolling average penalty conversion rate has increased
    The introduction of VAR has also led to a notable increase in the award of penalty kicks.
    According to Opta Analyst, the second season VAR was introduced saw 125 penalties awarded, or one every three games.
    This season has seen the figure stands at its fourth-highest in history, with one spot kick awarded every 3.5 games.
    With the increase in penalties being awarded, however, we have also seen penalties converted with record quality from 12 yards – an unprecedented 90 per cent.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    Even from last season the five-season rolling average for penalty kicks being converted has increased to a staggering 81.1 per cent, up from 74.8 per cent in the 1996/97 season.
    Goalkeepers have been further handicapped by video technology with the new rule that they cannot move off their line until the penalty is struck.
    This, combined with outfield players seemingly continuing to take leaps in terms of technical ability and ball striking has seen more penalties being scored.
    Despite this there must be something goalkeepers can do to tip the scales back into their favour when facing penalties. Well, yes, there is. The key for goalkeepers though might be to do nothing at all…
    Most read in Football
    Why do goalkeepers dive?
    In penalty shootouts at major competitions we often hear commentators say that all of the pressure is on the penalty taker with none on the goalkeeper.
    At the top level you expect players to be able to convert from the spot and as such the goalkeepers are not expected to save the shot.
    Jason Cummings channels Thierry Henry as he blunders famous spot-kick routine
    This means that goalkeepers will typically not be blamed by fans, coaches or team-mates for failing to stop the penalty but they will be highly praised should they manage to save one, or more than one.
    So, why do goalkeepers dive?
    We have seen a huge increase in outfield players adding a delay into their run before they strike the penalty.
    They will deliberately stutter or hop as they approach the ball before striking.
    Bukayo Saka stutters his run up as a tactic to throw off the goalkeeper
    This is intended to force the goalkeeper to move early and if the goalkeeper goes to one side then the player striking the penalty will go the opposite way.
    Despite not having the pressure on them, goalkeepers will still dive to their left or right as opposed to staying still in the centre of their goals. 
    Here Matheus Cunha stuttered and provoked Chelsea’s Djorde Petrovic into moving before he slotted the ball the opposite way
    If they stand still and the penalty goes to the left or the right then there will be an assumption from those watching that the goalkeeper did not do enough.
    Though the real reason behind the move is incomplete information.
    In this example Andre Onana sells himself early despite there being no run up from Pablo Sarabia
    Everton and England goalie Jordan Pickford went viral as cameras caught him looking at info on opposition penalty takers on crib sheets taped to his water bottles.
    Analysts at clubs will now spend time breaking down the penalty tendencies of players at their next opposition and goalkeepers will be given that information.
    This means that if a goalkeeper knows that their opponent goes to the goalkeepers left a high proportion of the time then diving in that direction is the smart thing to do.
    For goalkeepers to start saving more penalties we may well see them make a change to their approach to saving penalties, despite what fans might think.
    Should goalkeepers stand still?
    Although standing still in the centre of their goal may be against all of their instincts there is an argument that this would increase the chances of goalkeepers making a save from a penalty.
    In recent seasons we have seen a notable increase in the amount of players who include stutters or stops in their run as they wait for the goalkeeper to commit.
    This season has seen 15 spot kicks aimed down the middle of the goal, 14 of which have been scored.
    The conversion rate for these efforts sits at 93.3 per cent, while it the rate drops to 89.1 per cent for the corners.
    Last season the rate down the middle stood at 95 per cent while it was 69.6 per cent in the corners, with a total of 35 penalties being taken in the last two seasons.
    If goalkeepers can maintain their discipline and not move from the centre of the goal then this will start to put doubt in the head of the player who is taking the penalty.
    Here the goalkeeper commits to his right the ball before James Ward Prowse hits his penalty high to the middle
    They are essentially trying to wait until the last second before deciding whether to put the penalty to the left or to the right as opposed to making up their mind before they start their run up.
    The longer that the goalkeeper takes to move the greater the chance that the taker will start to panic and doubt themselves.
    Joao Pedro uses delays to wrong foot the goalkeeper before slotting the ball the other side of the net
    Waiting and staying in the centre of the goal would also be more effective for goalkeepers because of the technique and striking of players taking the kick.
    If the player in question catches the inside of the post, or even the side netting, with an accurate and well struck shot then there is very little chance that the goalkeeper could have made the save anyway.
    Here Ederson holds his central position for a Michael Olise penalty but loses his footing before the taker scores
    Increasingly, however, we are seeing penalties that are just played casually into the goal without getting anywhere near the corner of the goal.
    If goalkeepers were to remain in a central position then they would have more of a chance to react and save those penalties that are clipped just to either side but not right into the corner of the net.
    If the goalkeeper has the composure and conviction to stay in the centre of their goal then they will force the player taking the kick to amend their approach and perhaps overthink what they are going to do with the shot.
    Conclusion
    There is always a sense that the player taking the penalty has the advantage over the goalkeeper.
    And to be fair this should be the case as the defending team has been punished for a foul in their penalty area.
    READ MORE SUN STORIES
    Goalkeepers, however, need to find a way to level the playing field and to put some more doubt into the minds of the players taking the penalty.
    We believe that we are going to see more goalkeepers taking the decision to stand and make themselves big in the centre of the goal in order to put doubt back into the minds of the penalty takers. More

  • in

    Mystery as referee probed over claims he wore bodycam in kids’ footie match without permission

    A REF is being probed over claims he wore a bodycam in a kids’ footie match without permission.The match official told the coaches it was part of an FA-backed VAR-style trial.
    A ref is being probed over claims he wore a bodycam in a kids’ footie match without permission (stock pic)Credit: Getty
    Durham FA chief John Topping said they do not know if he was actually wearing video equipmentCredit: Supplied
    But when they double-checked, they were told there was no trial.
    An investigation has been launched by Northumberland and Durham County FAs following the U13 game in the Russell Foster Youth League.
    Refs wore bodycams in four grassroots leagues last ­season to see if respect improved — but only in adult matches and not in that area.
    Durham FA chief John Topping said they do not know if he was actually wearing video equipment.
    Read More on Football
    But he added: “He informed the coaches he was recording everything.
    “They couldn’t understand because the FA did do a pilot a few months ago with bodycams but not here.”
    Local football chiefs said they are investigating after a ref registered to Northumberland FA allegedly used a body-worn camera at a recent fixture.
    They added: “We must clarify that referees are not currently permitted to use body-worn cameras at any time.”
    Most read in Football More

  • in

    Mason Holgate shown straight red card for ‘scandalous’ tackle dubbed ‘worst I’ve seen in years’ by Jamie Redknapp

    SHEFFIELD UNITED star Mason Holgate was sent off for a horror tackle on Brighton’s Kaoru Mitoma.The defender was initially shown a yellow card by referee Stuart Atwell before he consulted the VAR monitor and upgraded the punishment.

    Mason Holgate saw red for a reckless lunge on Kaoru MitomaCredit: Reuters
    Holgate was initially shown a yellow card before Stuart Atwell consulted the VAR monitorCredit: Reuters
    Holgate could have no complaints over his dismissalCredit: Getty
    Mitoma was taken out by Holgate after his heavy touch gave the defender a chance to win the ball.
    But the Everton loanee lost control as he dived in on the winger, taking him out at knee height in the 12th minute.
    He appeared to win the ball with his other foot but Atwell was left with no choice but to brandish a red due to the strength of the challenge.
    Brighton players immediately began protesting as Mitoma writhed around in pain, and most inside Bramall Lane protested the booking.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    So there was uproar when Atwell upped the punishment to a red a few moments later.
    Sky Sports pundit called the tackle “scandalous”.
    The former Liverpool and Tottenham ace also felt it was “one of the worst tackles I’ve seen in years.”
    Things went from bad to worse for the Sheffield United faithful as Brighton opened the scoring from a corner they believe should have been given as a goal kick.
    Most read in Football
    HOW TO GET FREE BETS ON FOOTBALL
    Lewis Dunk headed back across goal from Pascal Gross’s corner and Facundo Buonanotte turned the ball home from close range, though it only just crossed the line and needed to ref to confirm on his watch that it was a goal.
    Moments later Danny Welbeck doubled the visitors’ lead after he reacted quickest to smash in a rebound after Wes Foderingham denied Mitoma at the back post.
    EXCL: My uncle played in the World Cup final, now I’m making my own way starring for Premier League club
    The Seagulls threatened to add a third soon after with Welbeck and Gross going close with chances from inside the box.
    Sheffield United have now had four red cards in the league this season and their defence continues to leak goals. More

  • in

    Fans baffled as Robertson smashes into Toney who’s denied penalty as they joke ‘Klopp farewell tour in full swing’

    BAFFLED football fans joked the “Jurgen Klopp farewell tour is in full swing” after Brentford were denied a blatant penalty. The ball bounced towards Ivan Toney in the Liverpool 18-yard box.
    Jurgen Klopp is leaving Anfield at the end of the seasonCredit: AP
    Ivan Toney was bundled to the ground by Andy RobertsonCredit: TNT Sports
    But as the England striker controlled it on his chest, he was clattered into by Andy Robertson.
    The left-back bundled into the back of Toney, sending him crashing to the ground.
    But as the former Hull man kept his footing and booted clear, referee Michael Oliver ignored the Bees’ protests.
    And VAR David Coote failed to intervene, either, despite the obvious bundle over from Robertson.
    READ MORE ON FOOTBALL
    So it was no surprise fans watching the action at home could not believe the officials refused to award a spot-kick – and joked Klopp is getting preferential treatment ahead of his upcoming exit.
    One said: “The Klopp Farewell Tour in full swing……”
    Another wrote: “Not quite sure how Brentford didn’t get a penalty here…”
    A third added: “Robertson bulldozing into Toney. How is that not a penalty? I just need an explanation. Anyone??”
    Most read in Football

    HOW TO GET FREE BETS ON FOOTBALL
    A fourth commented: “Robertson barges into Toney, gets none of the ball but no penalty. It’s actually laughable at this point.”
    A fifth fumed: “How is that not a penalty on Toney what a joke.”
    Jamie Carragher reveals absolutely savage X-rated text Gary Neville sent over Jurgen Klopp’s Liverpool exit
    And a final user replied: “How is that not a penalty? Robertson barged through the back of Toney it’s a stonewall nailed-on penalty every day ending in y, also what’s the VAR doing?”
    The controversial incident happened in the 72nd minute with Liverpool leading 3-0 at the Gtech Community Stadium.
    But moments later, Toney struck to pull one back – which could have made for an interesting finale.
    Cody Gakpo did seal the 4-1 win with a late fourth for the travelling Reds after Darwin Nunez, Alexis Mac Allister and Mo Salah’s goals.
    While it was still 0-0, though, Wataru Endo somehow escaped punishment despite a Diego Maradona-style fake header that saw him punch the ball, but it was missed by Oliver.
    However, the victory for table-toppers Liverpool came at a cost with both Curtis Jones and Diogo Jota going off injured and spotted leaving on crutches.

    Endo escaped with this blatant handball at BrentfordCredit: TNT Sports More

  • in

    ‘Most ridiculous thing ever’ – Bizarre Europa League goal given after epic ‘draught excluder’ free-kick fail

    QARABAG scored one of the most bizarre goals in Europa League history – thanks to a Braga star’s free-kick fail. The teams faced off in Portugal on Thursday night in the first leg of their knockout play-off.
    Victor Gomez took on the ‘draught excluder’ role for Braga in the Europa LeagueCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt
    He accidentally played all the Qarabag attackers onsideCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt
    Abdellah Zoubir pounced to turn the ball inCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt

    But the scores level at 1-1, Qarabag went back in front in baffling circumstances.
    Yassine Benzia’s initial free-kick 20 yards out hit the wall before falling to Abdellah Zoubir who rounded the goalkeeper and bundled into the back of the net.
    The goal, though, was initially ruled out for offside by the assistant referee.
    But when VAR checked the replays, they found that Zoubir was played on by the ‘draught excluder’ lying behind the wall.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    The role – deployed by Braga defender Victor Gomez – is designed to allow the wall to jump and not risk a sneaky free-kick taker sliding the ball underneath them.
    However, it backfired for Braga when Gomez’s head was the closest Braga defender to his own goal line and therefore marked the offside line.
    Zoubir, though, was in an onside position when the initial free-kick was taken.
    Then with the wall landing from their jump and Gomez lying on the floor, he made the most of the freedom in the Braga penalty area to score.
    Most read in Football
    HOW TO GET FREE BETS ON FOOTBALL
    The referee was instructed to award the goal, prompting wild celebrations for the Azerbaijani team and their dedicated fans who made the 9,600km round trip to Portugal.
    And those watching the Europa League action at home were left in disbelief.
    Watch astonishing moment Corinthians goalkeeper purposely doesn’t save free kick – but it’s for genius reason
    One said: “The draught excluder playing Qarabag all onside. Classic.”
    Another wrote: “It’s probably play of the year.”
    A third added: “Hopefully teams will stop doing it now cos it is one of the most ridiculous things that has ever come into the game.”
    And a shocked fourth simply commented: “No!”
    Zoubir added his second and Qarabag’s fourth of the night on 69 minutes before Joao Moutinho grabbed an injury-time penalty to keep Braga in the tie, trailing 4-2 going into the second leg next week.
    The initial free-kick hit the wallCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt
    The referee initially put his arm up to signal offsideCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt
    He overturned his decision after VAR had a lookCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt
    The goal prompted wild celebrationsCredit: X formerly Twitter / @footballontnt More

  • in

    Fuming Aston Villa fans claim Hojlund’s goal should NOT have stood as they spot issue in build up to Man Utd opener

    ASTON VILLA fans were left fuming over Rasmus Hojlund’s goal with many claiming it should have been disallowed.The striker netted for the fifth consecutive match to help United win 2-1, with Scott McTominay notching the winner.
    Casemiro was in an offside position when the free-kick was played inCredit: Sky Sports
    VAR was unable to check if Casemiro had interfered with playCredit: Getty
    But some Villa fans have suggested Hojlund’s goal should not have stood – because Casemiro was offside in the build-up.
    The United midfielder was stood in an offside position when Luke Shaw crossed his free-kick into the box.
    Casemiro jumped and competed for the ball but did not touch it – in fact he was no way near it.
    A Villa defender headed the ball behind for a corner which ended up with Hojlund firing in from Harry Maguire’s knock down.
    READ MORE ON MAN UTD
    But since the goal came from a new phase of play, VAR was unable to look at the free-kick and whether Casemiro had interfered with the Villa defender.
    That enraged some Villa supporters as they claimed they were hard done by.
    One fan reacted saying: “Casemiro is offside for the play leading to the corner. United score from the corner.
    “No VAR check. What’s the point of having it?”
    Most read in Football
    CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERS

    Another added: “To really put the icing on the cake, Casemiro was offside from the free-kick which led to the corner 🤦🏻‍♂️ I hate football on days like today.
    “Really didn’t do a fat lot wrong and end up on the defeated side. And it’s always against them too. Irritating
    Ten Hag reacts to Man Utd’s 2-1 win at Aston Villa
    A third wrote: “There we go Casemiro offside from freekick – lino and ref miss that and give a corner. They score from it, useless.🙄”
    And another commented: “That United goal was crazy. Softest free-kick of the season which then led to Casemiro being offside when they forced a corner in which they scored.
    “Referees so scared to make the right decisions, getting too complacent with VAR.” More