in

England shirt anger over ‘woke cross’ escalates as David Seaman asks ‘will they to change Three Lions to three cats?’


FOOTBALL legends today weighed in on the “woke” England replica shirt row – with one asking: “Will they change Three Lions to three cats?”

Nike revealed it had altered St George’s Cross using purple and blue horizontal stripes in what it called a “playful update” to the shirt ahead of Euro 2024.

Former England goalkeeper Peter Shilton has said he is ‘totally against’ the new shirt
Harry Redknapp has dubbed the shirt the ‘worst own goal ever’Credit: PA:Press Association
Nike revealed it had altered St George’s Cross using purple and blue horizontal stripesCredit: Nike/X

The US firm said the colours were inspired by the training kit worn by England’s 1966 World Cup winners.

Some football pundits and fans criticised the design and price of the shirt since it was launched earlier this week.

But the FA has no intention of recalling the new England shirt despite the ongoing controversy, according to reports.

Now footie legends like Harry Redknapp, Peter Shilton and David Seaman have had their say on the saga.

Read more Sports News

Redknapp this morning blasted the decision as “an absolute disgrace”.

He slammed: “I’ve seen plenty of own goals in my time, but this has to be the worst ever.

“Who on earth thought this was a good idea? It’s the cross of St George, red and white…would Nike do this with another country’s national flag?

“It’s something that should be respected, not changed for a bit of playful fun, as they put it.

Most read in Football

“In my book it’s an absolute disgrace – I hope they see sense and have a rethink.”

Former England goalkeeper Shilton also has his say – announcing he was “totally against” the new shirt.

He told GB News: “I am totally against it, which I don’t think is a surprise. I mean I am a traditionalist, really.

England’s Best and Worst Kits

“I think we have seen a lot of design changes on shirts and that’s to get the fans to buy the new shirt every time it changes.

“But now they are messing with the colours on a national flag and you know, where would it stop once it starts?

“Is the next shirt going to have more changes in the colour? So I am against it, I think it is wrong.

“It is only a small change, but I think it could be the start of more changes.

“That’s the way I look on it, once you start changing the colour. I mean the Three Lions is obviously traditional and the fans love that.

“I am very surprised to be fair that the FA agreed to this but it’s all about money and making money and if the shirt sponsor says look ‘we’d like to do this’ then sometimes you get maybe members at the FA who think, ‘Oh well, we are getting paid well for it.’ ‘You know, we won’t bother’.

England shirt change controversy

The latest Three Lions strip came under heavy fire after a sudden change.

The Three Lions’ strips were unveiled on Monday with the traditional red cross altered to one with navy, light blue and purple.

But Nike and the FA have “no plans” to recall the new England home kit amid a row over its altered St George’s flag.

Both the home and away kits were released earlier this week, with England set to debut them during the upcoming March internationals.

It is thought to be a nod to the 1966 World Cup winners’ training kit – which contained blue, red and purple.

The change led to some labelling the shirt “woke” as they called on the manufacturer to revert back to the usual colours.

But according to The Mail, Nike will not succumb to pressure from some England fans.

It is thought to be a nod to the 1966 World Cup winners’ training kit – which contained blue, red and purple.

The change led to some labelling the shirt “woke” as they called on the manufacturer to revert back to the usual colours.

But according to The Mail, Nike will not succumb to pressure from some England fans.

It is understood the flag alteration was the work of a Nike designer, but was also signed off by the FA.

And the FA insist the decision was made to “honour the classic colour regime of 1966 training gear”.

New kit releases are one of the highlights in the build-up to a summer tournament, but England fans have also been left frustrated by the cost of the Three Lions’ new jerseys.

England’s “authentic” home and away shirts for the European Championships have been priced at £124.99 for adults and a whopping £119.99 for children.

“But I think it is a precedent that we don’t want, you know, other things to suddenly change on the next England shirt, and you know maybe, you know a pink band going round the middle of the shirt – I mean you don’t know do you what they are going to change.”

England’s most capped men’s player, 74, also criticised the price of the new shirt.

An “authentic” version costs £124.99 for adults and £119.99 for children while a “stadium” version is £84.99 and £64.99 for children.

Shilton continued: “I do think also the cost of the shirts now is getting extortionate. I think the fans are getting ripped off in a way.

“I think it is going to be very difficult for parents if they have got a couple of kids to buy them each a new shirt, that’s why they make these changes.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has also slammed the new kit.

Colin Robertson says… shame on them

BY Colin Robertson

So that’s it then?

We’re now supposed to be ashamed of our national flag for the one event pretty much everyone could agree on its use?

American firm Nike’s decision to respin our simple flag on the new England kit into some sort of patriotically fluid symbol is the epitome of culture war vandalism.

Tradition and history don’t play well for greedy corporate firms.
They like meaningless b*ks that “represents everyone” and offends no-one.

Some millennial wazzock with a PhD in Wokeism will have doubtless pointed out five reasons why the St George’s Cross is just a vulgar symbol of oppression.

Far better to slowly eradicate it and create something new and meaningless and then pretend it’s progress.

And hey, their corporate customers, usually paranoid of giving offence, will thank them for it.

Just like the FA, stuck in its own woke groove, has done. Shame on them. Because the idea that this bastardisation is, as Nike has claimed, just a “playful update to the flag of St George…to unite and inspire” is utter cobblers and borderline offensive.

What is more uniting than following the national football team while proudly wearing the flag of your country?

We don’t want or need a new flag, playful or otherwise, to represent England. We have one already St George’s Cross?

He’d be f***ing furious.

He said: “Obviously I prefer the original, and my general view is that when it comes to our national flags, we shouldn’t mess with them.

“Because they are a source of pride, identity, who we are, and they’re perfect as they are.”

Meanwhile former England goalie Seaman, who played 75 times for his country, said “leave it alone”.

He said: “It doesn’t need fixing. What’s next, are they going to change the Three Lions to three cats? Leave it alone.

I’m not even sure they can properly explain why they thought they needed to change it in the first place.

Keir Starmer

“It’s the St George’s Flag. Leave it alone. I’m sure that if they’d approached the lads and asked them about it, they would have said no. Just leave it alone.”

Adrian Bevington, the former FA managing director, said he would not have signed off the shirt.

He told TalkSPORT: “I think it’s an emotive subject and it was always going to cause the conjecture that we’ve got.

“I always try and see it from all sides, and I understand from Nike’s perspective they’re looking to push all the time and be cutting edge and as modern as they can be to the different markets they serve.”

Bevington said however, it is “our flag”.

He continued: “When the games take place, particularly during the tournament, you’ll see the stadium absolutely swamped with the cross of St George hanging everywhere.

“It’s a national identity and I just don’t really think it needs to be changed. And it’s going to upset a lot of people because people do feel passionate about this.”

What has Nike said?

A Nike spokesperson told The Mail,: “The England 2024 Home kit disrupts history with a modern take on a classic.

“The trim on the cuffs takes its cues from the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, with a gradient of blues and reds topped with purple.

“The same colours also feature an interpretation of the flag of St. George on the back of the collar.”

But he added: “It may end up selling more kits for them, who knows, commercially it might drive it with the conjecture it’s created.

“If I’d been in a position to sign off or not, I wouldn’t have signed off on that personally.”

Brian Deane, who played as a forward from 1985 until 2006, branded the kit “ridiculous”.

He told The Sun: “Some people would say it’s just a small detail, but personally I think there are some things that should just be kept as they are.

“Sometimes when you try and make advances and develop it doesn’t always suit everybody, and certainly from the point of view of someone like myself who has played for England, the St George’s Cross has always been red, and many people of an older generation will take offence to that. I can understand why.

“I don’t see why there is a need to change it. It’s almost like trying to erase how things have been in the past and I don’t think it’s appropriate in this case.

“It’s very symbolic to a lot of people in this country and for whatever reason, branding or fashion, I don’t think it’s relevant and I think they’ve scored an own goal to be honest.

“It’s just something that people will feel as though they’re rights are eroded away and it’s quite inflammatory as you can see from the backlash.”

It comes after Sir Keir Starmer called on Nike to change the colour back to the traditional red.

He said he believed the flag was a “unifier” and insisted the sporting brand should “reconsider” the decision to modify it.

Sir Keir told The Sun: “I’m a big football fan, I go to England games, men and women’s games, and the flag is used by everybody.

“It is a unifier. It doesn’t need to be changed. We just need to be proud of it.

“So, I think they should just reconsider this and change it back. I’m not even sure they can properly explain why they thought they needed to change it in the first place.”

The Labour leader also called on Nike to reduce the price.

A Nike spokesperson previously told media outlets: “The England 2024 home kit disrupts history with a modern take on a classic.

“The trim on the cuffs takes its cues from the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, with a gradient of blues and reds topped with purple.

“The same colours also feature an interpretation of the flag of St George on the back of the collar.”

According to The Mail, Nike will not succumb to pressure from some England fans to change the alteration.

A Nike spokesperson said: “The England 2024 Home kit disrupts history with a modern take on a classic.

READ MORE SUN STORIES

“The trim on the cuffs takes its cues from the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, with a gradient of blues and reds topped with purple.

“The same colours also feature an interpretation of the flag of St. George on the back of the collar.”

David Seaman, who played 75 times for his country, said ‘leave it alone’
Some Three Lions fans have called for the shirt to be changedCredit: Twitter / England
Sir Keir Starmer slammed the FA and Nike for changing the national footie stripsCredit: Darren Fletcher
The altered badge is said to be honouring the 1966 training kitCredit: PA


Source: Soccer - thesun.co.uk


Tagcloud:

Neymar’s dad issues BRUTAL 11-word statement on Dani Alves as he refuses to pay disgraced ex-Barcelona star’s bail

Man Utd set to miss out on £5m windfall as struggling loan star slammed for ‘taking too long to convince’ new club