VAR

Subterms

    More stories

    • 225 Shares99 Views

      in Soccer

      Premier League club ‘demand referee Rob Jones be BANNED from taking charge of their matches’ after latest howler

      by

      NOTTINGHAM FOREST have demanded Rob Jones be BANNED from officiating their games, it’s been claimed.The 36-year-old controversially sent off Willy Boly in the Tricky Trees 3-2 defeat to Bournemouth last weekend.
      Willy Boly won the ball cleanly against Adam Smith in Nottingham Forest’s defeat to BournemouthCredit: ALAMY
      Referee Robert Jones deemed the tackle worthy of a second yellowCredit: PA
      Nottingham Forest have demanded Jones be banned from reffing their gamesCredit: ALAMY
      Boly was shockingly given a second yellow for a clean tackle on Adam Smith, much to the frustration of Forest fans.
      Professional Game Match Officials Ltd admitted they dropped a clanger during the match, with chief Howard Webb contacting Forest to issue a grovelling apology.
      But Forest want Prem officials to go a step further by not having Jones ref their games.
      That’s according to The Daily Telegraph, who claim they’ve lodged an official complaint and demanded to hear Jones’ conversation with the VAR.
      READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
      Forest’s reported complaint against Jones is the SECOND they’ve filed against the official.
      Jones was on VAR duty when Forest were on the receiving end of two controversial decisions against Manchester United in September.
      He backed on-the-pitch ref Stuart Atwell in his shock decision to send off Joe Worrall and his awarding of a late penalty to Marcus Rashford.
      New Forest chief Nuno Espirito Santo – who replaced the axed Steve Cooper – demanded a rule change be implemented following Boly’s shock dismissal.
      Most read in Football
      FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
      Forest boss Nuno Espirito Santo was fuming with the decision to send off Willy BolyCredit: Alamy
      The Portuguese gaffer said: “Very bad decision. A decision that totally changed the game.
      “It is more the frustration of knowing the approach of the referee is a bad one and the law says you cannot reverse the decision because it is two yellow cards. It is something they have to look at because it doesn’t make sense.
      “First of all, the approach of the referee is bad.
      “Boly has a first yellow card, which is fair, but then for the second the foot of Boly is under the foot of the Bournemouth player so the approach [from the referee] should be more cautious.
      “Wait a little bit for the help of an assistant or the help of VAR, hold your decision and they will tell you.
      “But after that he cannot reverse the decision.
      “Our fans deserve better decisions. They come here to see football and suddenly they see something which really changes the game.
      “I saw it over and over and over again to try and understand because I respect the referee.
      “I know it is a tough job. I have seen it many times and I cannot understand it, I cannot understand it. It was bad. It is a mistake, a huge mistake.” More

    • 250 Shares109 Views

      in Soccer

      Fans slam ‘absolute disgrace’ as Willy Boly sent off for ‘cleanest tackle’ and ask ‘how does VAR make this mistake?’

      by

      FANS have slammed the referee’s decision to dismiss Willy Boly during Nottingham Forest’s clash with Bournemouth.The forest centre-back was sent off in the 23rd minute after he picked up two yellow cards, but those watching at home are convinced he shouldn’t have been shown a red.
      Fans can’t believe that Willy Boly was sent off by referee Rob JonesCredit: Alamy
      The Nottingham Forest defender seemed to win the ball cleanly against Adam SmithCredit: Rex
      Smith went down under the challenge of Boly and the Ivorian was dismissed for a second yellow cardCredit: Rex

      Boly had been rightfully booked just five minutes into the game, but it was his second booking that left fans incensed.
      The Ivory Coast international slid into a tackle against Cherries defender Adam Smith while appearing to come away with the ball cleanly.
      His studs looked to be down and he only led with one foot, but regardless of the seemingly fair challenge Rob Jones dipped into his pocket for a second time and sent him packing.
      Fans couldn’t believe what they were seeing and took to social media to share their opinions on the decision that was labelled an “absolute disgrace” by many.
      READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
      One wrote: “So CLEARLY wins the ball. Absolutely ridiculous.”
      While another labelled Boly’s challenge as “the cleanest tackle” and couldn’t fathom why he had been sent off.
      One fan asked: “How does VAR make this mistake?”.
      Although the decision was frustrating, it was not the fault of VAR with the officials at Stockley Park unable to intervene in red cards that come as a result of two yellows.
      Most read in Football
      FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
      It wasn’t just fans that were furious about the decision either with Nottingham Forest’s new boss Nuno Espirito Santo venting his frustrations post match.
      Steve Cooper’s replacement said: “Look I’ve seen it over and over again on the screen and I still cannot understand it.
      “Honestly I cannot understand it. It’s a mistake and I think he should have taken more time for the VAR to advise him.
      “I think we and our fans deserve more respect because this is a decision that totally changed the game and it’s not fair,”
      It was even more frustrating for Nuno as he was unable to get any points on the board in his first game in charge at The City Ground.
      Forest ended up losing the game 3-2 after Dominic Solanke secured himself a hat-trick and Bournemouth all three points with an injury time winner.
      Despite the Tricky Trees valiant efforts they were on the receiving end of their tenth league defeat this season and now sit just two points off the relegation zone.
      Dominic Solanke’s hat-trick secured Bournemouth a 3-2 victory at The City GroundCredit: Getty More

    • 225 Shares169 Views

      in Soccer

      Watch bizarre moment Rennes are denied Europa League equaliser as VAR enforces little-known rule to leave fans baffled

      by

      RENNES went crazy with joy then astonishment – as VAR enforced a little-known rule to deny them a last-gasp equaliser and dump them in the Europa League play-offs.Video replays showed a “rare and unfortunate” infringement after Lorenz Assignon swept home 11 minutes into stoppage time during a 3-2 home loss against group winners Villarreal.
      Lorenz Assignon led Rennes’ ecstatic but short-lived celebrationsCredit: TNT Sports
      Rennes thought they had scored to secure a place in the #UEL last 16, deep into added time, but VAR had other ideas 😳Can anyone work out why this goal was disallowed? 🤯 pic.twitter.com/WHsxtuEt6I— Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) December 14, 2023

      Assignon fired the ball home long after the initial free-kickCredit: TNT Sports
      Players from both sides were baffledCredit: TNT Sports
      Rennes’ Enzo Le Fee had taken a free-kick earlier in the build-up – with the ball cannoning off the bar and the midfielder touching it next.
      But that was long forgotten when Assignon fired the ball home in the middle of a crowded penalty area – sparking wild celebrations.
      However, VAR stepped in to ensure the goal was disallowed – much to Villarreal’s relief.
      That’s because a free-kick taker can’t be the first player to touch the ball after their own initial contact with it.
      READ MORE TOP STORIES
      Commentator Sam Matterface joined viewers and pundits in being bemused – with TNT Sports at first suggesting offside might be the reason.
      And after the game Matterface posted on X: “‘I’m still baffled…..”
      Even Rennes manager Julien Stephan was in shock – and not just because a draw would have displaced Villarreal as group winners.
      He admitted he had to be told about the obscure law on free-kicks.
      Most read in Europa League
      FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
      Stephan said: “I learned it too, I knew the rule on penalties, I didn’t know that it could exist on free kicks. It’s an emotional elevator.
      “I knew the rule existed for penalties, I didn’t know it existed for free kicks. It’s an emotional rollercoaster at this moment in time.”
      Fans were also confused, with verdicts including “Devastating” and “VAR ruining the game again”.
      One viewer wrote: “I’m almost certain this would be allowed in the PL because those on VAR would just not know that free kick law. Utterly useless.”
      But other observers were more clued up.
      Such experts pointed out the situation with posts like this: “Free-kick hits bar then comes back to player without a second player touching it. It’s the same as a player kicking the ball to himself. Rare and unfortunate.”
      Assignon blasts home but a rarely-used rule denied him late gloryCredit: TNT Sports
      Both teams protested as they waited for the VAR verdictCredit: TNT Sports More

    • 213 Shares149 Views

      in Soccer

      SunSport expert says Tottenham star Romero should have been sent off for shocking lunge.. and fans agree

      by

      CRISTIAN ROMERO was extremely lucky not to be sent off against Newcastle.The Tottenham defender’s second-half challenge endangered the safety of Callum Wilson with excessive force.
      Cristian Romero challenge on Callum Wilson
      “I don’t think he’ll learn. I think it’s in him. Some players you can’t tame them. He’s one of those”The Super Sunday panel discuss Cristian Romero’s yellow card 🟨 pic.twitter.com/x6opwq33gx— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) December 10, 2023

      I wouldn’t blame referee Chris Kavanagh for showing a yellow card as Ben Davies appeared to block his viewing angle.
      But Romero, just back from a ban, went over the top, caught Wilson twice and this was a case for VAR intervention and a red card.
      Brentford’s Frank Onyeka and Jacob Brown of Luton should have also been red-carded this weekend for similar challenges which went unpunished.
      We need to eradicate them from the game because a player will get seriously injured if we continue to allow them.
      READ MORE TOP STORIES
      Romero has just returned from a three-game ban for a straight red card earlier this season.
      So that means, had he received the same punishment on the pitch this time he would have picked up a four-game suspension.
      Most fans were incredulous at what seemed his fierce follow-through on Wilson’s ankle did not lead to his instant dismissal in Spurs’ 4-1 win.
      One viewer hit out: “How is that not a red? Wtf!”
      Most read in Football
      Jacob Brown’s tackle could have seriously hurt Man City star Phil FodenCredit: Rex
      Frank Onyeka stayed on despite this challenge on Sheffield United’s Vini SouzaCredit: Reuters
      CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFER
      Another argued: “Red card definitely. Looking at similar situations this is obvious. Have some consistency for once.”
      A third fan suggested some officials are hesitant to dish out straight reds – because of video replays.
      He wrote: “The referee gave a yellow cos he knows he has VAR to fall back on! This has been the referee mentality since VAR has came in! They don’t make the decisions and wait for VAR!”
      Many observers reckon Romero is a “beast” – but opinion is split on whether he can, or should, be controlled.
      One claimed: “He might not be the same player if you tame him.”
      Another fan made a similar point: “Romero’s style might be untameable, an innate part of his game.”
      But this post summed up the alternative thinking: “He’s a beast, but he needs to chill. Too many cards, too many fouls.” More

    • 250 Shares109 Views

      in Soccer

      Gary Lineker rants VAR is ‘spoiling the game’ and admits he feels ‘guilty’ over backing its introduction in shock U-turn

      by

      GARY LINEKER has admitted he feels “guilty” for backing the introduction of VAR after performing a U-turn on its implementation.Despite the technology being brought in to provide clarity and certainty, it feels as though it now creates more debate than ever before.
      Gary Lineker no longer backs VARCredit: EPA
      Lineker fumed at the decision to penalise Havertz for a handballCredit: Getty
      Clubs such as Liverpool, Arsenal and Wolves have all been on the wrong end of high-profile errors this season.
      PGMOL bigwig Howard Webb has already had to issue apologies to several managers this season after complaints from clubs.
      Lineker has complained on Match of the Day several times this season about VAR and revealed he regrets ever backing its implementation.
      Lineker was speaking with Jermaine Jenas and Ian Wright when they analysed Aston Villa’s victory over Arsenal.
      READ MORE ON FOOTBALL
      Arsenal fans felt they were wrongly denied a penalty during their 1-0 defeat to Villa, as Douglas Luiz brought down Gabriel Jesus in the box.
      Kai Havertz also had a goal ruled out for a handball during a scramble with Matty Cash in the Aston Villa box.
      Lineker was particularly incensed by the incident, saying: “Why is it that the defenders can accidentally hand ball it but the forwards can’t? Why are we trying to stop goals? 
      “The people who make the laws of the game, why are they doing that, its really bizarre.
      Most read in Football
      CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFER
      “I have to say I really don’t like VAR very much anymore, I was one of those that advocated it and I actually feel quite guilty, I was definitely wrong, it’s spoiling the game.”
      Wright also chimed in to call the handball ridiculous and called it “the most ridiculous law in all of law, not just football”.
      Wolves fans even staged a protest yesterday during their draw with Nottingham Forest More

    • 213 Shares99 Views

      in Soccer

      Eagle-eyed fans spot raging Roy Hodgson’s disgusted reaction to VAR ruling out Crystal Palace penalty vs Liverpool

      by

      FOOTBALL fans spotted Roy Hodgson spitting on the sidelines after a VAR decision went against Crystal Palace during their Premier League clash with Liverpool.The Palace boss was left fuming after his team were denied a penalty in the 29th minute.
      Roy Hodgson was spotted spitting on the sidelinesCredit: TNT
      Liverpool defender Virgil van Dijk was shown a yellow card after fouling Odsonne Edouard in the box.
      However, Andy Madley’s decision to award the spot-kick was overturned after a VAR intervention.
      Will Hughes was deemed to have fouled Wataru Endo in the build-up, so Liverpool were instead awarded a free kick and Van Dijk’s booking was overturned.
      Hodgson was then spotted spitting next to the dugout in frustration.
      Read More on Football
      Some fans picked up on it, with one person tweeting: “Not sure what’s more shocking: the fact Andy Madley didn’t think that was a foul initially or the fact Roy Hodgson just SPAT on the floor in his technical area.”
      While another wrote: “He just did WHAT in his technical area?”
      However, VAR did come to the rescue for Palace during the second half.
      Jean-Philippe Mateta went down following a challenge from Jarell Quansah in the Liverpool box, with Madley initially dismissing his concerns.
      Most read in Football
      FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
      But after taking another look, Madley reversed the call to give Palace the penalty and Mateta fired his team into a 1-0 lead.
      Palace striker Jordan Ayew was then sent off after receiving two yellow cards and Liverpool went on to complete a comeback, winning 2-1 thanks to goals from Mo Salah and Harvey Elliott. More

    • 250 Shares119 Views

      in Soccer

      Fans reckon ref blunder vs Spurs ‘best thing that’s ever happened to Liverpool’ after yet more VAR controversy at Palace

      by

      FOOTBALL fans reckon Liverpool are getting the rub of the green with VAR ever since their controversial defeat to Tottenham.That’s after Virgil van Dijk escaped giving away a penalty at Crystal Palace due to a foul in the build-up.
      Some fans reckon Liverpool are getting VAR decisions ever since their defeat to SpursCredit: Alamy
      Virgil van Dijk gave away a penalty before VAR intervenedCredit: PA
      The penalty was eventually ruled out for a foul on Wataru Endo earlier in the build-upCredit: TNT
      VAR made the huge call during Saturday’s Premier League clash at Selhurst Park.
      Van Dijk was penalised for a foul in Liverpool’s box on Palace striker Odsonne Edouard.
      The Dutchman looked distraught as referee Andy Madley pointed to the spot.
      However, the official was instructed by VAR to check the pitch-side monitor as there may have been a foul on a Liverpool player in the build-up.
      READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
      Wataru Endo collided with Will Hughes earlier on, conceding possession which eventually resulted in Palace’s penalty.
      But VAR and Madley agreed it was a pertinent issue in play.
      And to the jeers of the Selhurst Park crowd, the penalty was overturned.
      Fans at home were certainly unimpressed, with many feeling that Liverpool have been getting most VAR calls ever since a shocking call went against them in September’s defeat at Spurs.
      Most read in Football
      FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
      Luis Diaz’s perfectly legal goal was ruled out for offside as the Reds lost 2-1 while also having two players sent off.
      But some supporters reckon Liverpool are now reaping the benefits.
      One said: “Liverpool ever since the Spurs game has had every decision go in favour of them. VAR is a joke.”
      Another declared: “Absolutely insane that the on-field call doesn’t stand there. It’s a foul, but the ref didn’t think it was. If that’s most other teams, VAR doesn’t intervene.”
      One added: “Ruling that goal out against Spurs is the best thing to ever happen to Liverpool.”
      However, VAR did come to the rescue for Palace during the second half.
      Jean-Philippe Mateta went down from a foul by Jarell Quansah in the Liverpool box, with Madley initially waving away his concerns.
      But VAR had a check and informed the ref that his decision needed checking on the screen.
      And after taking a look, Madley reversed the call to give Palace the penalty.
      Mateta then slammed home his effort to put the Eagles ahead at Selhurst Park.
      Read more on The Sun
      However, goals from Mo Salah and Harvey Elliott helped Liverpool come back to take all three points and take over from Arsenal, who play on Saturday night, at the top of table. More

    • 200 Shares109 Views

      in Soccer

      Brighton players fume as Chelsea benefit from little known rule after VAR denies Seagulls last-gasp penalty

      by

      BRIGHTON felt hard done by after a little known rule robbed them of an injury-time corner and chance to salvage an equaliser.The Seagulls and Chelsea played a thrilling contest at Stamford Bridge on Sunday.
      Enzo Fernandez was the hero for Chelsea after scoring twiceCredit: PA
      Brighton players appeal before a VAR decision is overturned at Stamford BridgeCredit: PA
      And there was late drama in West London when the visitors were awarded a penalty in the final moments by referee Craig Pawson.
      However, following a VAR check Pawson was asked to look at the screen to check his on-field decision.
      With the ball clearly striking Levi Colwill’s face and not his arm as the official initially believed, he reversed his decision.
      Interestingly, the game was restarted with drop ball, when Brighton’s stars were fuming because the ball hit Colwill and went behind for a corner.
      READ MORE CHELSEA NEWS
      But, that wasn’t an error from Pawson as Brighton’s stars fumed.
      The rules state that if the game has to be restarted following a reversed VAR call, a drop ball is given to restart proceedings.
      The decision caused plenty of confusion from fans online too.
      One wrote on X: “Drop ball?? No corner?”
      Most read in Football

      FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
      A second asked: “Why wasn’t that a corner?”
      A third added: “We didn’t even get a corner wtf is this corruption?”
      The Blues got off to a flyer at Stamford Bridge when Enzo Fernandez opened the scoring on 17 minutes.
      Four minutes later, Colwill gave Chelsea some breathing space. Just like Fernandez, it was the England defender’s first ever goal for the club.
      Brighton got themselves back into the game right before half-time, when Facundo Buonanotte beautiful curling finish from inside the box beat Robert Sanchez.
      Then, Conor Gallagher got himself sent off after receiving his second yellow card for a daft challenge on Billy Gilmour.
      A Fernandez penalty appeared to settle the host’s nerves in the 65 minute.
      However, Joao Pedro’s 92nd minute strike set up a barnstorming finish. More