More stories

  • in

    Howard Webb set for blockbuster VAR grilling with PGMOL chief to address series of controversial decisions in just days

    HOWARD WEBB is set for a massive VAR grilling when he addresses the recent set of controversial decisions.The weekend’s football action saw Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta brand the officiating a “disgrace” after his sides 1-0 defeat to Newcastle.
    Howard Webb will address the weekend’s VAR decisions in the coming daysCredit: Getty
    Newcastle’s winner at Arsenal was controversially allowed to stand
    While the Tottenham vs Chelsea game had a host of decisionsCredit: Getty
    Arteta questioned the competence of referee Stuart Atwell and the VAR team but did not call their integrity into account.
    FA disciplinary chiefs are deciding whether or not to pursue action following his comments.
    The Gunners released a statement backing their manager in light of the controversial decision to allow the goal, though it seems likely he will escape with a warning rather than a fine.
    PGMOL chief Webb will address the complaints in the coming days after another weekend of VAR controversy.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    He is due to appear on the latest episode of “Match Officials Mik’d Up” which is scheduled to be broadcast at the start of next week in the international break.
    The Gordon goal is expected to be given top billing.
    Webb has addressed glaring VAR mistakes in the past.
    In early October, he responded to Luis Diaz’s wrongly disallowed goal against Tottenham and Mateo Kovacic not being sent off against Arsenal.
    Most read in Football
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS AND BONUSES NEW CUSTOMERS
    Anthony Gordon’s Newcastle winner being allowed to stand was the most high-profile decision over the weekend’s action before the chaotic Monday evening game between Tottenham and Chelsea.
    The game, dubbed the “maddest game ever” saw a staggering 11 major VAR checks.
    These included four disallowed goals, three red-card and two penalty checks in the first half alone.
    Other games over the weekend where VAR was called into action saw Harry Maguire ruled offside for Scott McTominay’s strike minutes into the Manchester United and Fulham game.
    Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker also described the ruling to award a pivotal penalty to Sheffield United at the end of their match against Wolves as a “stinking decision”.
    Amid another weekend of controversy, Arteta was slammed for his behaviour by the CEO of Ref Support UK, Martin Cassidy.
    He said: “Mikel Arteta’s touchline behaviour is the worst in the Premier League and his behaviour is a large part of the problem in football.
    “He has become a Mercedes version of Neil Warnock.”
    Ange Postecoglou voiced his support for the referee’s when speaking after the Tottenham defeat.
    He said: “You have to accept the referee’s decision, that is how I grew up.
    “This constant erosion of the referee’s authority is where the game is going to get – they are not going to have any authority.
    “We are going to be under the control of someone with a TV screen a few miles away.
    Read More on The Sun
    “The decision is the decision. In 26 years I have had plenty of bad decisions, I have had plenty fall in my favour. It is what it is.”
    Elsewhere, Anthony Taylor will return to the Premier League to whistle Chelsea’s match against Manchester City despite making an error in the Championship. More

  • in

    VAR is opposite to the spirit of the Beautiful Game.. it is just increasing rage and bitterness and needs to be scrapped

    NEWCASTLE v Arsenal is really becoming a beautiful grudge match.And Saturday’s clash at St James’ Park was a spiteful old-school classic for the delectation of neutrals.
    The VAR review of Newcastle’s winner against Arsenal has caused uproarCredit: Sky Sports
    I’m not sure whether I agreed with any of the major decisions reached by ref Stuart Attwell and VAR Andy Madley.
    On the modern interpretation of the laws, both Kai Havertz and Bruno Guimaraes should probably have been sent off before half-time.
    And Anthony Gordon’s winner for Newcastle probably should have been disallowed for a foul or a handball by Joelinton and possibly for offside — and because the ball went out of play.
    But in a way, Attwell and Madley officiated the match brilliantly simply by keeping all 22 players on the pitch and allowing us to enjoy such a riveting spectacle.
    READ MORE ARSENAL NEWS
    It was a feisty, fast and furious game which ended with Mikel Arteta spewing his guts about refereeing standards and Jorginho refusing to shake hands with Jamaal Lascelles, who publicly slated him for it.
    All good fun, if you believe that football is a game to be enjoyed for its glorious spontaneity, that you embrace its controversies, and you understand that everyone — including the refs — make mistakes in every match.
    For a century and a half, everyone basically accepted this.
    Managers, players and fans ranted about refs but in the cold light of the following day, everyone generally shrugged their shoulders and got on with their lives.
    Most read in Football
    VAR reviewed a possible foul and offsideCredit: Sky Sports
    And then came VAR, and with it the idea that football is a business of utmost seriousness, which demands the impossibility of ultimate justice — raising expectations of officials to unreachable limits.
    And so you get statements like that made by Arsenal on Sunday, attempting to add gravity to Arteta’s understandable heat-of-the-moment meltdown and insisting that refereeing standards must be ‘urgently addressed’.
    This on the back of Liverpool’s statement which talked of ‘escalating’ their issue with match officials after Luis Diaz’s disallowed goal at Tottenham in September.
    These statements are self-important but vague and they hint at the idea that there used to be a golden age of officialdom where everybody agreed referees were competent.
    Rather than making these grandstanding public proclamations, clubs should address the elephant in the room — that VAR doesn’t work, that it doesn’t make sense, that it causes increased rage and bitterness and that it must be scrapped.
    Given that London’s top football clubs keep hiring Fleet Street’s finest reporters as communication chiefs on vast salaries, we really ought to expect more common sense than this.
    Because Diaz’s goal at Spurs would still have been wrongly ruled out for offside without VAR and it would have been swiftly forgotten about, as everyone used to realise errors were inevitable before technology was introduced.
    Officials felt Joelinton did not foul Gabriel at the back postCredit: Sky Sports
    Gordon’s winner for Newcastle may well have been allowed without VAR, too.
    Who knows because most top-flight refs have now lost the courage of their convictions and are relying on VAR, which often makes matters worse, to bail them out.
    As a case study on why VAR doesn’t work, Gordon’s goal is pretty much perfect. It doesn’t work because such a large proportion of decisions made by football referees are subjective, such as Joelinton’s possible foul and handball.
    Interestingly, neither Arteta nor his club have specified which of the four possible reasons they think Gordon’s goal should have been ruled out for.
    Because the truth is all four issues were either subjective or inconclusive.
    Maybe it should have been disallowed for all four reasons. Maybe none of them.
    You win some, you lose some.
    Mikel Arteta fumed at the officials after the matchCredit: Sky Sports
    Unless you’re Wolves, when every major decision goes against you and refs’ chief Howard Webb grovels to you every Monday morning, either publicly or privately.
    Somehow, Wolves seem to accept all of this with remarkably good grace.
    Yet Liverpool and Arsenal display the same sense of entitlement with which they, along with the rest of the Big Six, attempted to destroy the English football pyramid by agreeing to join a breakaway European Super League.
    Managers have always lost their rag when these big decisions went against them.
    But only since VAR have clubs started making po-faced statements, treating controversial refereeing decisions as if they are major international diplomatic incidents.
    This is the crux of the matter — you either acknowledge that football is a game, you enjoy its spontaneity, intensity and controversy, you accept mistakes and support the scrapping of VAR.
    Read More on The Sun
    Or, like the American owners of Arsenal and Liverpool, you believe that football is primarily a business and that it demands forensic justice.
    And I know which option sounds more fun. More

  • in

    Gary Neville recreates Arsenal vs Newcastle VAR controversy revealing bizarre optical illusion tricking fans

    GARY NEVILLE has blamed an “optical illusion” for Newcastle’s winner against Arsenal after recreating the controversial VAR controversy.The Sky Sports pundit conjured a new angle to suggest the ball WAS in just before Anthony Gordon sunk the Gunners in Saturday’s Prem clash.
    This angle was called an ‘optical illusion’ by Gary NevilleCredit: Twitter @SkySportsPL
    Gary Neville went ‘above’ and beyond for his verdict on the in-or-out rowCredit: Twitter @SkySportsPL
    Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta blasted the officiating as “embarrassing” and a “disgrace” after a TRIPLE check on the goal went against his side.
    The video assistant decided that replays offered no clear proof the ball had gone out, nor that Joelinton had fouled Gabriel or was offside.  
    And most fans appeared to welcome the intervention from Manchester United legend Neville.
    The ex-England defender used an overhead camera to show a ball near the line could be in, even when past the line and not touching it.
    READ MORE TOP STORIES
    That’s because the angle from above confirmed part of the ball could still be sticking out across the line.
    Nev stressed he was not trying to prove if the ball was out on Saturday – and was only commenting on the first stage of the VAR check.
    He said: “In real time you do see that gap between the ball and the line.
    “We’re not trying to say the ball was in or out.
    Most read in Football
    “We’re trying to say that VAR cannot make a decision to overturn the on-field decision – because it’s really clear there’s ambiguity. It’s an optical illusion. That ball is clearly in.”
    Saturday’s VAR had no such overhead view to assess.
    Nev added: “Switch to the other angle – that VAR had to look at on Saturday… and I can understand completely why they couldn’t over-rule the on-field decision based on that point one.”
    One viewer responded: “Arsenal fans aren’t gonna like that.”
    Another agreed: “He makes a completely valid point, but Arsenal fans will still find a way to hate.”
    But a Gunners’ supporter insisted: “Important thing is Joelinton’s foul and offside. Stop clouding the issues.”
    And this verdict backed that up: “If Arsenal are so wrong why are they going the great lengths to try and convince us? Get rid of VAR and go back to the game we love. I can live with human error. Let’s just admit it will always exist.”
    But a fifth observer focused on Neville’s intensive efforts to make his point.
    “Gary, you’ve more work rate on this game than I ever saw you have on the pitch,” he joked. More

  • in

    Gary Neville slams Arsenal statement on VAR controversy as ‘poor and dangerous’ and calls on Premier League to act

    ARSENAL’S decision to publicly back Mikel Arteta’s criticism of VAR has not gone down well with Gary Neville.Following their controversial 1-0 loss to Newcastle last weekend, Gunners boss Arteta branded the refereeing “a disgrace.”
    Gary Neville has labelled Arsenal’s statement in support of Mikel Arteta’s criticism of the refereeing last weekend as “poor” and “dangerous”Credit: Twitter @SkySportsPL
    Arteta blamed their 1-0 loss to Newcastle on refereeing mistakesCredit: Reuters
    The loss had its fair share of drama, including a contentious goal from Anthony Gordon which the Spaniard clearly did not believe should have counted.
    Then there was the decision not to send off Newcastle star Bruno Guimaraes.
    Arteta said post-game: “I have praised my players for the performance and the way that we played – we didn’t deserve to lose the match.
    “We lost the match because of the clear and obvious decisions. It’s embarrassing. It’s a disgrace. That’s what it is, a disgrace.”
    Read More on Football
    Arsenal subsequently released a statement on their website in support of Arteta’s comments, due to what they described as “yet more unacceptable refereeing and VAR errors on Saturday evening.”
    The statement went on to read: “PGMOL urgently needs to address the standard of officiating and focus on action which moves us all on from retrospective analysis, attempted explanations and apologies.”
    Now, former Manchester United defender turned Sky Sports pundit Neville has slammed the Gunners’ statement.
    He said: “I thought the statement was really poor.
    Most read in Football
    The 48-year-old went on to explain: “I think the Arsenal statement is quite dangerous.
    “I think all clubs have signed up to a new behavioural charter at the start of the season.
    “I’m not saying that referees shouldn’t be put under pressure and Mikel Arteta or other managers shouldn’t feel aggrieved at the end of matches, what I am saying is that the clubs themselves should definitely behave better in these circumstances.”
    Neville also went on to add that the PGMOL has “got to start to protect referees”.
    He added: “At the very beginning, I was excited by the new transparency, the apologies to managers and the fact that the referees were communicating with the clubs.
    “But in return what they’re getting is significantly and seriously undermined by their own clubs and I think the Premier League have to get this in order.”
    As things stand, Arteta’s comments are set to go unpunished by the Prem and the PGMOL.
    However, a warning could still head his way should it be decided that his comments were “prolonged” or “unreasonable.”
    Arsenal’s statement has reportedly also left league and PGMOL bosses frustrated.
    Whether or not Newcastle midfielder Joelinton fouled Arsenal’s Gabriel (second from left) during the game’s sole goal has proved controversialCredit: Getty More

  • in

    Ian Wright launches X-rated response to VAR row over Newcastle’s controversial winner against Arsenal

    IAN WRIGHT has launched an X-rated response to VAR’s review of Newcastle’s winner against Arsenal.Anthony Gordon controversially scored the only goal of the game at St. James’ Park on Saturday.
    Ian Wright has issued an X-rated response to Newcastle’s controversial winnerCredit: Rex
    Anthony Gordon’s goal against Arsenal was awarded after a lengthy VAR reviewCredit: Getty
    His goal was awarded after a lengthy VAR review, which has caused uproar from the Gunners and their supporters.
    Replays were checked to see if the ball had gone out of play in the build-up to Gordon’s strike.
    Meanwhile, VAR also reviewed a possible offside and foul before awarding the goal.
    Joelinton had challenged Gabriel inside the penalty area, but it was deemed to not be a foul.
    READ MORE ARSENAL NEWS
    However, Wright disagrees and has now responded on social media.
    The former Arsenal striker shared a new angle of the “foul” to X, formerly Twitter.
    His post shows Gabriel falling to the floor with Joelinton’s hands on his back.
    Alongside the picture, he wrote: “Bro. I’m done with people saying this is not a foul, 50 f***ing 50.”
    Most read in Football
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS AND BONUSES NEW CUSTOMERS
    His rant comes after Mikel Arteta had slammed the “embarrassing” officiating after the match.
    He called the decision a “disgrace” and suggested the officials brought the Premier League into disrepute.
    Arsenal later made a public statement in support of their manager, who has escaped punishment from the FA for now.
    Arteta could still be charged with misconduct, though, but is not expected to receive more than a warning and will not be fined. More

  • in

    Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta set to escape FA punishment for astonishing VAR rant after Newcastle loss.. for now

    PREMIER LEAGUE and PGMOL chiefs will not respond to Mikel Arteta’s Newcastle rant – until next week.Arsenal boss Arteta slammed the “embarrassing” officiating in his side’s 1-0 defeat as a “disgrace”, suggesting it brought the Prem into disrepute.
    Prem and PGMOL chiefs will not respond to Mikel Arteta’s Newcastle rant until next weekCredit: Alamy
    VAR awarded the goal after checking if the ball had gone out of play in the build-upCredit: Sky Sports
    Joelinton’s challenge on Gabriel was also checked for a possible foulCredit: Sky Sports
    VAR could not rule the goal out for offside as there was ‘no available angle to see the point of contact’Credit: Sky Sports
    While the Gunners chief questioned the competence of ref Stuart Attwell and the VAR team at Stockley Park over Anthony Gordon’s controversial winner, he did not call their integrity into account.
    And while he could yet be charged with misconduct if found to have made a “prolonged” or “unreasonable” complaint, it is more likely that he would be hit with a warning rather than a fine.
    Arsenal’s decision to make a public statement in support of Arteta on Sunday ruffled feathers at both Prem headquarters near Paddington and for PGMOL bosses.
    Privately there is understood to have been a feeling that the Gunners over-reacted in a determination to show they had Arteta’s back.
    read more on arsenal
    And while Arteta had reason for being unhappy at the crucial decision it is felt he went too far – especially as there was no conclusive proof that the ball was out before being crossed by Joe Willock or that Gordon was offside.
    FA disciplinary beaks are expected to confirm whether or not Arteta faces any action on Tuesday after all his post-match comments have been reviewed.
    Despite that, Prem bosses and PGMOL head Webb will not make any official comments in response this week.
    Webb, though, is certain to give the incident top billing in the next edition of “Match Officials Mik’d Up”, scheduled to be broadcast at the start of next week in the international break.
    Most read in Football
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS AND BONUSES NEW CUSTOMER
    The PGMOL boss may agree that Joelinton could have been deemed to have fouled Gabriel in the immediate build-up to the goal, although he will point out it was a subjective decision – and that the on-field ruling of a goal has to have priority unless there is definitive proof of an error.
    That view was articulated by former Prem ref Dermot Gallagher, who told Sky Sports News: “The crux of the matter is that it was a subjective decision.
    “For me, it’s a push but I’ve spoken to a lot of people and while a lot agreed with me there were as many who didn’t.
    “That’s the dilemma. The referee said it wasn’t a foul and the VAR didn’t see enough to over-rule him.” More

  • in

    Anthony Taylor makes another ‘stinking’ decision after Premier League howler as fans say ‘demote him to LEAGUE ONE’

    FANS have slammed referee Anthony Taylor after he put in another controversial performance in charge of Preston’s win over Coventry.Taylor was demoted to the Championship at the weekend as punishment for awarding Newcastle a questionable penalty in their 2-2 draw at Wolves a week earlier.

    Anthony Taylor came under fire for awarding Preston a controversial penaltyCredit: Getty
    The decision was not overturned by VAR but the PGMOL still decided to demote Taylor for the first time in four years.
    However, he fared no better in the Championship as his decision to award Preston a first-half penalty sparked outrage from fans.
    Milutin Osmajic raced through on goal and Coventry defender Kyle McFadzean tried to haul him down just before he shot.
    But there was minimal contact and Osmajic did not appear to be affected as he struck the ball, though he did appeal for a penalty.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    Taylor awarded the spot-kick, leading one fan to suggest he should be demoted again to League One.
    One fan reacted saying: “Mental, not the only thing that was shocking yesterday.”
    Another added: “Jesus Christ that’s bad 🤣”
    A third wrote: “Poor decision. Also if that’s his decision, as the player wasn’t making a genuine attempt to play the ball, shouldn’t it be a red card?”
    Most read in Football
    CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERS
    And another commented: “Probably even worse decision than Hwang’s, how is it possible to make another howler like that in the very next game?
    “I wouldn’t allow him back in the Prem again.”
    Taylor is not the first Premier League official to be demoted this season.
    Assistant referee Adrian Holmes officiated Millwall’s clash with Hull last month after incorrectly deeming Luis Diaz’s goal against Tottenham to be offside – a decision that was controversially not overturned by VAR in a shocking error. More

  • in

    There were THREE major refereeing mistakes in Arsenal’s loss to Newcastle – ex-ref Halsey understands Arteta frustration

    I CAN understand Mikel Arteta’s frustrations after Arsenal’s defeat at Newcastle.There were three VAR checks for Anthony Gordon’s winner and I felt there was a clear push by Joelinton on Gabriel.
    Stuart Attwell was at the centre of the VAR controversy as Newcastle beat Arsenal
    Ex-ref Mark Halsey believes Gabriel was pushed for Newcastle’s winnerCredit: Getty
    Halsey understands Mikel Arteta’s frustrationCredit: PA
    Had ref Stuart Attwell disallowed the goal or VAR Andy Madley recommended a review then there would have been few complaints.
    On the other two checks, the TV camera angles shown were inconclusive as to whether Joe Willock kept the ball in play during the build-up.
    VAR tried to look if Gordon was also offside.
    But there was no available angle to see the point of contact from Joelinton so the officials were unable to determine when the Magpies midfielder last touched the ball and therefore if Gordon was offside.
    Read more on Arsenal
    It was the latest high-profile error and the mistakes are happening every week.
    Why is this? The leadership, direction and coaching from Howard Webb’s management team is not up to the task.
    Kai Havertz and Bruno Guimaraes were both lucky to avoid a red card.
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS AND BONUSES NEW CUSTOMERS
    Havertz dodged a clear sending-off for a poor challenge on Sean Longstaff which ticked all the boxes for serious foul play under Law 12.
    Most read in Football
    Guimaraes should also have been dismissed for violent conduct after his forearm smash on the back of Jorginho’s head.
    Ref Attwell didn’t see it but that’s what VAR is for. More