More stories

  • in

    Eagle-eyed fans spot raging Roy Hodgson’s disgusted reaction to VAR ruling out Crystal Palace penalty vs Liverpool

    FOOTBALL fans spotted Roy Hodgson spitting on the sidelines after a VAR decision went against Crystal Palace during their Premier League clash with Liverpool.The Palace boss was left fuming after his team were denied a penalty in the 29th minute.
    Roy Hodgson was spotted spitting on the sidelinesCredit: TNT
    Liverpool defender Virgil van Dijk was shown a yellow card after fouling Odsonne Edouard in the box.
    However, Andy Madley’s decision to award the spot-kick was overturned after a VAR intervention.
    Will Hughes was deemed to have fouled Wataru Endo in the build-up, so Liverpool were instead awarded a free kick and Van Dijk’s booking was overturned.
    Hodgson was then spotted spitting next to the dugout in frustration.
    Read More on Football
    Some fans picked up on it, with one person tweeting: “Not sure what’s more shocking: the fact Andy Madley didn’t think that was a foul initially or the fact Roy Hodgson just SPAT on the floor in his technical area.”
    While another wrote: “He just did WHAT in his technical area?”
    However, VAR did come to the rescue for Palace during the second half.
    Jean-Philippe Mateta went down following a challenge from Jarell Quansah in the Liverpool box, with Madley initially dismissing his concerns.
    Most read in Football
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
    But after taking another look, Madley reversed the call to give Palace the penalty and Mateta fired his team into a 1-0 lead.
    Palace striker Jordan Ayew was then sent off after receiving two yellow cards and Liverpool went on to complete a comeback, winning 2-1 thanks to goals from Mo Salah and Harvey Elliott. More

  • in

    Fans reckon ref blunder vs Spurs ‘best thing that’s ever happened to Liverpool’ after yet more VAR controversy at Palace

    FOOTBALL fans reckon Liverpool are getting the rub of the green with VAR ever since their controversial defeat to Tottenham.That’s after Virgil van Dijk escaped giving away a penalty at Crystal Palace due to a foul in the build-up.
    Some fans reckon Liverpool are getting VAR decisions ever since their defeat to SpursCredit: Alamy
    Virgil van Dijk gave away a penalty before VAR intervenedCredit: PA
    The penalty was eventually ruled out for a foul on Wataru Endo earlier in the build-upCredit: TNT
    VAR made the huge call during Saturday’s Premier League clash at Selhurst Park.
    Van Dijk was penalised for a foul in Liverpool’s box on Palace striker Odsonne Edouard.
    The Dutchman looked distraught as referee Andy Madley pointed to the spot.
    However, the official was instructed by VAR to check the pitch-side monitor as there may have been a foul on a Liverpool player in the build-up.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    Wataru Endo collided with Will Hughes earlier on, conceding possession which eventually resulted in Palace’s penalty.
    But VAR and Madley agreed it was a pertinent issue in play.
    And to the jeers of the Selhurst Park crowd, the penalty was overturned.
    Fans at home were certainly unimpressed, with many feeling that Liverpool have been getting most VAR calls ever since a shocking call went against them in September’s defeat at Spurs.
    Most read in Football
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
    Luis Diaz’s perfectly legal goal was ruled out for offside as the Reds lost 2-1 while also having two players sent off.
    But some supporters reckon Liverpool are now reaping the benefits.
    One said: “Liverpool ever since the Spurs game has had every decision go in favour of them. VAR is a joke.”
    Another declared: “Absolutely insane that the on-field call doesn’t stand there. It’s a foul, but the ref didn’t think it was. If that’s most other teams, VAR doesn’t intervene.”
    One added: “Ruling that goal out against Spurs is the best thing to ever happen to Liverpool.”
    However, VAR did come to the rescue for Palace during the second half.
    Jean-Philippe Mateta went down from a foul by Jarell Quansah in the Liverpool box, with Madley initially waving away his concerns.
    But VAR had a check and informed the ref that his decision needed checking on the screen.
    And after taking a look, Madley reversed the call to give Palace the penalty.
    Mateta then slammed home his effort to put the Eagles ahead at Selhurst Park.
    Read more on The Sun
    However, goals from Mo Salah and Harvey Elliott helped Liverpool come back to take all three points and take over from Arsenal, who play on Saturday night, at the top of table. More

  • in

    Brighton players fume as Chelsea benefit from little known rule after VAR denies Seagulls last-gasp penalty

    BRIGHTON felt hard done by after a little known rule robbed them of an injury-time corner and chance to salvage an equaliser.The Seagulls and Chelsea played a thrilling contest at Stamford Bridge on Sunday.
    Enzo Fernandez was the hero for Chelsea after scoring twiceCredit: PA
    Brighton players appeal before a VAR decision is overturned at Stamford BridgeCredit: PA
    And there was late drama in West London when the visitors were awarded a penalty in the final moments by referee Craig Pawson.
    However, following a VAR check Pawson was asked to look at the screen to check his on-field decision.
    With the ball clearly striking Levi Colwill’s face and not his arm as the official initially believed, he reversed his decision.
    Interestingly, the game was restarted with drop ball, when Brighton’s stars were fuming because the ball hit Colwill and went behind for a corner.
    READ MORE CHELSEA NEWS
    But, that wasn’t an error from Pawson as Brighton’s stars fumed.
    The rules state that if the game has to be restarted following a reversed VAR call, a drop ball is given to restart proceedings.
    The decision caused plenty of confusion from fans online too.
    One wrote on X: “Drop ball?? No corner?”
    Most read in Football

    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
    A second asked: “Why wasn’t that a corner?”
    A third added: “We didn’t even get a corner wtf is this corruption?”
    The Blues got off to a flyer at Stamford Bridge when Enzo Fernandez opened the scoring on 17 minutes.
    Four minutes later, Colwill gave Chelsea some breathing space. Just like Fernandez, it was the England defender’s first ever goal for the club.
    Brighton got themselves back into the game right before half-time, when Facundo Buonanotte beautiful curling finish from inside the box beat Robert Sanchez.
    Then, Conor Gallagher got himself sent off after receiving his second yellow card for a daft challenge on Billy Gilmour.
    A Fernandez penalty appeared to settle the host’s nerves in the 65 minute.
    However, Joao Pedro’s 92nd minute strike set up a barnstorming finish. More

  • in

    Controversial VAR decisions causing friend and family rows, study finds

    CONTROVERSIAL VAR decisions are causing friend and family rows, a survey has revealed.One in eight footie fans said they have led to ­friction and fallings-out.
    VAR decisions are causing rows within families and friend groupsCredit: Getty
    In contrast, only one in 12 said decisions by Premier League on-pitch referees led to serious anger.
    The survey found Arsenal fans argue with loved ones the most, with 20 per cent of the Gunners’ supporters bickering about Video Assistant Referee decisions.
    Chelsea, Southampton, Manchester United and Tottenham followed on the list.
    Aston Villa fans had the least rows, with only six per cent having a bust-up after the game.
    READ MORE FOOTBALL NEWS
    Betting site freebets.com asked 2,000 Premier League fans and found arguments are most often caused by disallowed goals for off side and penalty decisions.
    Spokesman Tim Agnew said: “The positive news is it’s making referees more popular, or at least the ref is no longer getting the brunt of fans’ fury.”
    It comes after the International FA Board last week said it was considering extending existing checks for goals, penalties and red cards to corners, free kicks and yellow cards. More

  • in

    It would’ve been better if VAR had never existed, here’s the Premier League rule change I’d introduce to sort it out

    INTO the rumpus about VAR, a new variant steps.Sin bins have long been of interest, even to an experiment in lower leagues which has been proclaimed a success.
    VAR hasn’t improved football, claims SunSport columnist Karren BradyCredit: Rex
    Bins have long been acceptable in rugby too and many other sports.
    I’m no expert on brutes hurtling into each other at speed but it can be brief entertainment amid the endless gaps for head injuries and checking what a pitchside telly made of things.
    No, not wrestling, I mean Sir Clive Woodward’s sport.
    Now the International Football Association Board (IFAB, although not so fab after VAR introduction) are declaring serious interest in sin bins.
    Read More on Football
    It’s temporary ten-minute dismissals for offences like dissent. No wonder when dissent leapt from 174 offenders to 345 in our pro game last season.
    It’s a blight but it’d be useful to know how many offences occurred after dubious VAR rulings which have left football feeling like it’s being strangled.
    VAR should be limited to offside, goal-line checks . . . and little else.
    It’s now a ref’s crutch rather than an aid and games are often decided by VAR stinkers, with Newcastle’s Champions League draw at Paris Saint-Germain this week the most recent example.
    Most read in Football
    Changes since the Premier League was founded in 1992 are prodigious and mostly positive but include VAR.
    Sir Bobby Charlton and Terry Venables, both of whom died this autumn, were not much involved in the Prem as it grew from its infancy.
    It became rich and influential and, as a player and manager, Venables in particular must have been envious of rewards in the latter years of his 80.
    Twice capped by England, he was a good enough midfielder to bank more than £100,00-a-week these days.
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
    Brady would limit VAR’s involvement to basic checksCredit: Getty
    A clever and admired man, his CV included a LaLiga title with Barcelona, an FA Cup with Tottenham and numerous promotions, so he’d have regarded £100,000 as penny-pinching.
    Charlton was a football great as good as George Best in a Manchester United forward line that also boasted another exciting player in Denis Law.
    I doubt there has ever been a better front three anywhere but English football then wasn’t rich enough to compete with foreign big shots for stars.
    It is different today in a world where you can bring in  players from, say, South Korea to North Macedonia.
    It was the Prem who supercharged the change and now their squads  are only 30 per cent British on average.
    But Scottish players are nearly as rare as 100 per cent proof whisky.
    Not all changes are for the best, though, and although the temptation to cheat has always existed, VAR appears to have encouraged players to take penalty area dives and fake head injuries in order to waste time.
    Read More on The Sun
    But better coaching has heightened entertainment and helped attract capacity crowds to 95 per cent of games and a massive overflow on television.
    Once regarded as the enemy at the gate, TV is now beloved as publisher and paymaster. More

  • in

    Why Man Utd may have LOST Galatasaray game by Premier League rules with Uefa VAR drawing different line for Icardi goal

    MAURO ICARDI’S disallowed goal against Manchester United may have stood if it was scored in the Premier League.So United could have lost to Galatasaray as Icardi’s strike would have levelled the match at 2-2 just before half-time.
    Uefa judges offside from the start of the arm so Mauro Icardi was offsideCredit: TNT Sports
    Icardi’s strike would have made the score 2-2Credit: AP
    Instead Erik ten Hag’s side went 3-1 up before being pegged back, as VAR backed up the linesman’s call that Icardi was offside.
    Uefa use a semi-automated system to judge offside in the Champions League and Icardi was a fraction beyond the last defender Harry Maguire.
    But in the Premier League no such system is in place, with VAR officials instead reliant on drawing lines to determine offside.
    Icardi was offside by the tightest of margins with only his shoulder beyond Maguire, with the semi-automated system drawing a line right where Maguire’s arm started.
    READ MORE ON MAN UTD
    However Premier League officials judge the starting point of offside at the logo on the arm – lower than the automated system.
    That meant Icardi likely would have been called onside, so his goal would have stood and United may have lost.
    The Red Devils were also fortunate Scott McTominay was not penalised for handball when the ball struck his arm in the penalty area.
    Uefa referees have been quick to award penalties whenever the ball strikes an arm in the box, as Newcastle found out against Paris Saint-Germain on Tuesday.
    Most read in Champions League
    CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERS
    However, Galatasaray also benefitted from the officials for their first goal as Hakim Ziyech fired a free-kick past Andre Onana.
    Icardi broke a law of the game as the ball was hit, as he was stood too close to the wall – the law states attacking players must remain at least one metre away from a wall containing four or more players. More

  • in

    Premier League club exec BANNED by FA after calling referee Anthony Taylor ‘f***ing useless’

    WOLVES’ sporting director has been fined and handed a BAN after swearing at referee Anthony Taylor.The FA charged Matt Hobbs with misconduct after he called Taylor “f***ing useless” following Wolves’ 2-2 controversial draw with Newcastle.
    Wolves chief Matt Hobbs has been banned for a game after swearing at Anthony TaylorCredit: Getty
    Hobbs called Taylor ‘f***ing useless’ after Wolves’ controversial draw with NewcastleCredit: AFP
    Gary O’Neill’s side went behind to a questionable penalty following an extremely lengthy VAR check.
    The Wolves manager himself branded the decision “scandalous.”
    And following the game, Hobbs swore at Taylor while also sarcastically saying “we look forward to your apology again.”
    Hobbs, who expressed remorse over his misconduct, said he had become “increasingly frustrated” over the decisions from Taylor.
    READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
    He has now been banned for Wolves’ next game against Arsenal.
    And Hobbs must also pay a £4,000 fine after Wolves were caught up in another VAR storm against Fulham.
    Boss O’Neill was left incensed as the Cottagers were handed two controversial penalties in a 3-2 win, while also seeing Fulham escape several red cards.
    And he claims referee Michael Salisbury ADMITTED he and VAR had got crucial decisions wrong during the game.
    Most read in Football
    FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES
    O’Neill said: “We discussed a lot of decisions. Vinicius should have been sent off for headbutting Max [Kilman]. Clear, he headbutts him on the nose. Isn’t sent off, is given a yellow.
    “Tim Ream should have been sent off for a second bookable offence on the penalty. They’re both my opinions on those, obviously everyone can have their own.
    “The penalties that went against us, Nelson plays the ball, doesn’t touch Tom Cairney. I watched that back with the referee and, to be fair to him, he says he thinks they’ve got that wrong and he should have been sent to the monitor.
    “Doesn’t help me, doesn’t help all the fans that have travelled all this way to watch the team, doesn’t help the players who are feeling frustrated again.
    “So the Nelson one has pretty much been admitted by the referee that they made a mistake.
    “The one on Harry Wilson we disagree on a little bit. He thinks there’s enough contact there to give a penalty. I think it’s really soft.
    “So you could argue two of them could go against us, but for all four of them to go against us is a tough one for the lads, the supporters and myself to take because we’ve been here a lot of times this season. 
    “It’s tough because we didn’t deserve that.” More

  • in

    Fans call ‘FIX’ as Galatasaray have goal vs Man Utd ruled out for controversial VAR after McTominay handball ignored

    FANS believe Manchester United’s clash with Galatasaray has been rigged after the Red Devils benefitted from a tight offside call and a controversial handball decision.The Red Devils raced into a 2-0 lead in Istanbul but could have gone into half-time all square.
    Mauro Icardi was judged to be offside by the highest of margins
    Scott McTominay was not penalised after the ball struck his arm
    Hakim Ziyech pulled one back and Mauro Icardi then fired past Andre Onana – only to be called offside.
    The lino flagged the striker offside and VAR backed up his decision in a matter of seconds – seemingly without drawing the lines.
    Even the semi-automated system sparked controversy as Harry Maguire appeared to play Icardi onside with the top of his arm.
    A fan reacted saying: “Never offside. Such a disgrace.”
    READ MORE ON MAN UTD
    Another remarked: “Where were the lines? He looks on.”
    And a third wrote: “Robbery.”
    Galatasaray also could have had a penalty but Scott McTominay was judged not to have committed a handball despite the ball striking his arm in the penalty box.
    Fans were outraged by the decision – particularly as it came less than 24 hours after Newcastle defender Tino Livramento was punished for a lesser offence.
    Most read in Champions League
    FREE BETS – BT BETTING OFFERS AND BONUSES NEW CUSTOMERS
    The right-back was penalised for handball despite the ball coming off his thigh first before hitting his arm with the faintest of touches.
    Champions League referees have been quick to point to the spot whenever a ball strikes a players hand in the area – as United found out to their advantage and their detriment in their previous European clash against Copenhagen.
    United have conceded a penalty in their four previous Champions League games, yet some fans feel the referee letting them off means the game is a fix.
    One said: “Think about it… Uefa will lose a lot of profit if United don’t make it through, so they will do as much as they can to make them qualify.
    “RIGGED 🥴🥴🥴”
    Another added: “This is a clear penalty, VAR rigging the match for Manchester United again smh💔🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️”
    A third said: “To be honest that was a clear penalty, fix is def in tbh.” More