VAR

Subterms

    More stories

    • 225 Shares139 Views

      in Soccer

      Premier League reveals six-point plan to fix VAR after 19 teams vote to keep it despite horror gaffes

      by

      PREM clubs have agreed a six-point battle plan to FINALLY make VAR fit for purpose.But the move came after Wolves were left ENTIRELY isolated in their call for the technology to be scrapped next season.VAR has been hugely controversialCredit: AFPWolves felt they were especially hard done byCredit: GettyThe Molineux club were outvoted by 19 clubs to one after their call was dismissed at the Prem’s AGM in Harrogate.But refs’ chief Howard Webb vowed that his new measures, including the introduction of Fifa and Uefa-style Semi Automated Offside Technology and a significantly higher bar for VAR intervention, will address the issues that have dogged the system ever since its introduction five years ago.In a statement introducing the six step programme, which pointed out that VAR “produces more accurate decision-making”, the Prem conceded that “it was agreed that improvements should be made for the benefit of the game and supporters”.That brought the “six key areas” that Webb and his PGMOL colleagues are expected to utilise to bring long-term change for the better.READ MORE FOOTBALL NEWSThe statement confirmed: “Premier League clubs today voted in favour of continuing to operate VAR in the Premier League. “While VAR produces more accurate decision making, it was agreed that improvements should be made for the benefit of the game and supporters.”As part of thorough discussions at the Annual General Meeting, it was agreed that PGMOL, the Premier League and clubs all have important roles to play in improving the system and its reputation.”Stockley Park VARs will be told only to intervene when an on-field decision is “clearly wrong”, rather than the previous instruction to identify and “clear and obvious” error.Most read in FootballCASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERSIt is anticipated that SAOT will take up to 45 seconds off the average delay time for offside decisions.The League explained: “Semi-Automated Offside Technology will provide quicker and consistent placement of the virtual offside line, based on optical player tracking, and will produce high-quality broadcast graphics to ensure an enhanced in-stadium and broadcast experience for supporters.”Man Utd legend Wayne Rooney leaves Sky Sports studio in stitches with brutal one-word response to news of VAR voteRefs will be mik’d up to explain why a decision has been changed, either after a pitchside review or on a factual call by Stockley Park.Webb is also determined to improve the quality of VAR interventions, including creating a specialist team rather than having to use current Prem refs in the video booth role.But the latter two points are an admission that fans and the wider game have frequently felt short-changed by a system that was designed to bring clarity and more consistency.And Webb, backed by the Prem, will keep pushing Law-makers on the International FA Board to lift its ban on “live” broadcast of VAR communications between officials, although the Zurich-based body remains resistant at this stage.Premier League’s six-point VAR plan

      Maintaining a high threshold for VAR intervention to deliver greater consistency and less interruptions to the flow of the game.
      Reducing delays to the game, primarily through the introduction of semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) and the maintained high threshold for VAR intervention.
      Improving fan experience through a reduction in the delays, in-stadium announcements from referees after a post-VAR change of decision and where possible, an enhanced offering of big screen replays to include all VAR interventions.
      Working with PGMOL on the implementation of more robust VAR training to improve consistency, including an emphasis on speed of process while preserving accuracy.
      Increasing transparency and communication around VAR – including expanded communications from Premier League Match Centre and through broadcast programming such as Match Officials Mic’d Up.
      The delivery of a fan and stakeholder VAR communication campaign, which will seek to further clarify VAR’s role in the game to participants and supporters.

      That could mean asking Ifab to be allowed to trial the process to see if it does work without embarrassing or causing additional issues for officials.VAR was introduced in the Premier League from the start of the 2019/20 season.The current campaign has seen multiple flashpoints caused by the use of video assistant referees.Liverpool wrongly had a goal disallowed in their controversial loss to Tottenham in September.Meanwhile, Nottingham Forest have written letters of complaint to the PGMOL.READ MORE SUN STORIESForest even publicly questioned the appointment of VAR Stuart Attwell after their defeat to Everton last month.Clubs in Sweden recently voted against introducing VAR to the country’s top-flight.Wolves’ VAR complaintsWolves have listed nine negative repercussions from the introduction of VAR in their complaint.

      Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special
      Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication
      A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR
      Overreach of VAR’s original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game’s fluidity and integrity
      Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to the safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch
      Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards
      Disruption of the Premier League’s fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long
      Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league
      Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption More

    • 213 Shares169 Views

      in Soccer

      VAR offsides could be ‘scrapped’ from Euro 2024 as UEFA is taken to court by tech firm

      by

      VIDEO reffed offsides could be sensationally scrapped from the Euros – because the inventor of a similar system is taking UEFA to COURT.A firm that created tech like that used by VAR to spot goalside attackers wants the organisers halted from using it – claiming their idea has been copied.Video reffed offsides could be sensationally scrapped from the Euros – because the inventor of a similar system is taking UEFA to courtCredit: The TimesThey have bagged a court date to apply for an injunction just ten days before the opening match of the tournament, which kicks off in Munich on June 14.If granted it may rule out UEFA using the love-hate system – just as fans have started to accept it.The ruling would represent a huge embarrassment to European football’s governing body – which has spent a fortune licensing the system from another firm.An England fan said: “It’s just farcical. How has it got to this stage SO close to the Euros.Read More on Euro 2024“Love it, or hate it – we’ve all started getting used to VAR.“Can you imagine if England end up going out because of a duff decision thay VAR would usually have picked up?“There would be uproar. UEFA needs to sort it out.”Dutch firm Ballinno has filed a patent infringement suit against UEFA and ball tracking experts Kinexon, from Germany – alleging unauthorised use of its technology.Most read in FootballIt claims that 13 years ago it was granted a patent for a ‘method and system for detecting an offside situation’.It says it registered a proposal for a chip in balls to alert an earpiece worn by officials at the exact moment it is kicked – removing the need to continuously watch players.Man Utd legend Wayne Rooney leaves Sky Sports studio in stitches with brutal one-word response to news of VAR voteThe firms are now set to face a show-down in a courtroom in Hamburg, less than two weeks before Germany and Scotland begin the tournament, in Munich, on June 14.Incredibly the last-minute legal face-off comes despite the initial application being logged on April 18 – five weeks ago and the first contact over the claim being made last year.But Florian Müller, a patent law expert, told Dutch media the timing was clearly designed to put UEFA under time pressure.This Saturday’s FA Cup final and the Champions League final at Wembley will be unaffected, falling before the June 3 hearing – which will be chaired by three judges.A spokesman for UEFA said: “We cannot comment as such on ongoing litigation matters. However, UEFA is not overly concerned by Ballinno’s application.”He added UEFA did not believe the use of VAR would be impacted – even if it lost the case.The original patent that was filed shows a ball-tacking tech intended to alert referees specifically to offsides.READ MORE SUN STORIESIt is unclear whether the claimant alleges the whole of VAR has infringed its original patent – or just offsides.A patent expert in the UK told The Sun: “It would be for a court to decide whether any of the protected tech was being unfairly used in the VAR process.” More

    • 263 Shares139 Views

      in Soccer

      Football could be hit by most radical change to offside law in 30 YEARS as Wenger presses ahead with ‘daylight’ rule

      by

      ARSENE WENGER is set to press ahead with the most radical rule change football has seen in more than 30 years as he looks to implement his “daylight” offside law. The former Arsenal boss is Fifa’s chief of global football development.Arsene Wenger is set to press ahead with his radical offside proposalCredit: GettyThe player above would NOT be offside using the new ruleCredit: DirectTVSportsHe has been a major advocate for a huge change to the offside rule that will effectively mean there has to be “daylight” between attacker and defender for an offside offence.The new rule dictates if any part of an attacker’s body that can score — head, torso or legs — is still in line with the defender then they should be judged onside.Wenger, 74, has viewed results from trials for the new rule – performed in Sweden, Italy and the Netherlands – as positive, according to The Times.And he is now set to propose this new offside law to football lawmakers at the International FA Board (Ifab).READ MORE IN FOOTBALLThe most recent big change to the offside law came in 1990, when Scotland successfully proposed that attackers could be onside if they are level with defenders instead of behind them.Ex-Arsenal vice chairman David Dein backed the proposal when attending the Fifa congress in Bangkok last week, calling it “refreshingly innovative”.However, ex-Portugal star Luis Figo, who is now head of Uefa’s Football Board, is understood to be among those with reservations to the idea.Speaking in 2020, Wenger said: “There is room to change the rule and not say that a part of a player’s nose is offside, so you are offside because you can score with that. Most read in FootballBEST FREE BET SIGN UP OFFERS FOR UK BOOKMAKERS”Instead, you will be not offside if any part of the body that can score a goal is in line with the last defender, even if other parts of the attacker’s body are in front.”That will sort it out and you will no longer have decisions about millimetres and a fraction of the attacker being in front of the defensive line.”Rules of football under review after unknown Swedish club find loophole in offside lawWenger also wants to introduce kick-ins in the defensive half if they are taken within five seconds to help speed up play. More

    • 250 Shares109 Views

      in Soccer

      Wolves have star SENT OFF by VAR in Klopp’s final Liverpool game days after filing motion to have it scrapped

      by

      NELSON SEMEDO was sent off for a lunge on Alexis Mac Allister in Wolves’ final-day clash with Liverpool.Referee Chris Kavanagh originally gave a yellow card but upgraded the punishment after being asked to check the monitor by the VAR.Nelson Semedo catches Alexis Mac Allister on the ankleCredit: Sky sportsThe Wolves star got his marching ordersCredit: ReutersMac Allister needed treatment after the challengeCredit: GettyThe Reds are trying to send Jurgen Klopp out on a high as the German leaves after eight-and-a-half years at the helm.And their chances were boosted by the red.Mac Allister scored just eight minutes later and Jarell Quansah made it 2-0 five minutes before the break.”No complaints. Abysmal challenge from Semedo,” said one fan on X.READ MORE IN FOOTBALLAnother added: “I think its an orange card, but what I’d say is that I’d find it impossible to believe the decision would have been overturned if it was Macallister on Semedo rather than the other way around. “Maybe I’m just paranoid/disillusioned though.”Top-flight sides are set to vote on whether or not to continue using the video assistants following a complaint from Wolves.According to The Athletic, the club have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League calling for VAR to be scrapped.Most read in FootballCASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERSIn doing so, Wolves have triggered a vote from the 20 clubs on June 6.A statement from Wolves reads: “There is no blame to be placed — we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football — and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success.Jurgen Klopp joins Instagram to share sweet farewell video.. and includes subtle nod to first Liverpool press conference”However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League, it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future.”Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards.”The club added that they accept the decision to introduce VAR was “made in good faith” and “with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart”.Wolves’ VAR complaintsWolves have listed nine negative repercussions from the introduction of VAR in their complaint.

      Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special
      Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication
      A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR
      Overreach of VAR’s original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game’s fluidity and integrity
      Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to the safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch
      Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards
      Disruption of the Premier League’s fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long
      Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league
      Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption

      However, they now argue the practice has caused “numerous negative consequences”.Wolves also claim those consequences are “damaging the relationship between fans and football” as well as “undermining the value of the Premier League brand”.Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the Premier League said: “The Premier League can confirm it will facilitate a discussion on VAR with our clubs at the annual general meeting next month.”Clubs are entitled to put forward proposals at shareholders’ meetings and we acknowledge the concerns and issues around the use of VAR.READ MORE SUN STORIES”However, the league fully supports the use of VAR and remains committed, alongside PGMOL, to make continued improvements to the system for the benefit of the game and fans.”VAR: The great debate
      Martin Lipton’s pro VAR view
      FAST forward 12 months to May 18, 2025.
      After 89 minutes at Molineux, Wolves, needing to win their last game of the season to stay up, are beating Manchester United, who require a point for Champions League football.
      A ball over the top sends Rasmus Hojlund racing away. The flag stays down. Hojlund scores. Wolves are relegated.
      And on the way home, the dejected Wolves fans see the still image on their phones.
      Hojlund was 2ft offside. No question. A shocker.It means at least a year in the Championship, £100million income drop, a firesale of the squad. While United bank an extra £50m.
      But it’s OK. Every  one of those fans, plus smiling boss Gary O’Neil and the  Wolves board, will line up to say: “No worries. It’s what we voted for. Rough with the smooth.”
      Yes. And I’ve got a bridge to Ireland to sell you.
      Dan King’s anti VAR view
      THREE cheers and a hearty slap on the back for Wolves chairman Jeff Shi.
      For mentioning the unmentionable,  for speaking commonsense to deaf ears, for proposing that VAR should be scrapped.
      Shi is doomed to failure. His suggestion is unlikely to even go to a vote at next month’s Premier League AGM.
      And if it does get that far, it has a cat in hell’s chance of receiving the two-thirds majority required to carry such a radical proposal.But in one statement on Wednesday, Shi proved that he will be the brightest man in that meeting room.
      He claimed VAR ‘has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand’.
      And he is absolutely spot on.
      The argument against VAR is wide-ranging and yet completely basic.
      If you believe that football is a sport, to be enjoyed in all its spontaneous, high-tempo glory, then you are against VAR.
      If you believe that football is a business, that it is far more important than a mere game, that forensic evidence must be applied, that we must reach the closest point to ultimate justice at all costs — and if you also believe that match-going supporters are irrelevant — then you are in favour of VAR. More

    • 263 Shares169 Views

      in Soccer

      ‘Maybe it’s time to give it the boot’ – West Ham CEO joins VAR criticism ahead of landmark Premier League vote

      by

      To VAR or not to VAR, that is the question.Well, it will be next month when all 20 Premier League clubs will decide what to do about the most controversial new plaything in football since they invented the ref’s whistle. Not quite, but you get my point.Referees like Michael Salisbury must wait to see if the plug will be pulled on VAR next season by a vote from Prem clubs next monthCredit: RexThe use of video replays has divided opinion amongst pundits and fansYou don’t need a PhD in human behaviour, or even more baffling, the handball laws, to realise VAR has not been a universal success.It was supposed to iron out the mistakes, make the game fairer for all and improve the overall experience for fans. To put it plainly, it has done none of that.At West Ham, any decision on which way to vote has not yet been decided but in many ways VAR has been a disaster, especially for the lifeblood of the game, the supporters.I have lost count of the number of times fans have said to me, ‘please get rid of it’ — and I can sympathise.READ MORE TOP STORIESSupporters pay good money to be entertained and sitting there waiting for interminable minutes for a  decision from Stockley Park has been driving many bonkers.My real problem with VAR is this — it was intended to eliminate mistakes and yet week in, week out, it does no such thing.Errors are being made all over the Prem and against every club.Fans can deal with the human error of the ref because they understand that we all make mistakes and they accept refs make honest mistakes.Most read in FootballLong delays for decisions as well as bad errors have irked critics of VARCredit: AFPBEST FREE BET SIGN UP OFFERS FOR UK BOOKMAKERSWhat they find hard to understand is how a so-called expert, in a room many miles away, with countless TV angles, can get it wrong, so often.That is my principal beef with VAR and over the five years it has been with us, it has not got much better or quicker, despite the fact that every season there have been assurances it will improve.Man United defender Harry Maguire wants VAR SCRAPPED…except in ONE way and gives Fury vs Usyk predictionAlso, VAR was introduced to avoid ‘clear and obvious errors’. We would all agree it has not been used for that.We have had instances where errors have not been corrected which a blind man could have spotted.Added to that, VAR has also punished clubs when their players have done nothing wrong. Those who back VAR say it works on offside ‘line’ decisions. But can they honestly say the Coventry FA Cup semi-final ‘winner’ wasn’t a goal because their player was a gnat’s whisker offside. Surely it is impossible to accurately record EXACTLY when a ball left the passer’s boot.Wolves have asked for the vote and, as a league shareholder, they have every right to do so.And I don’t think it is just a Wanderers whinge following a succession of decisions that went against them — most of us feel like that.I think they genuinely want to see a return to the days when refs got it right almost all the time and we could live with that.Wolves’ VAR complaintsWolves have listed nine negative repercussions from the introduction of VAR in their complaint.

      Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special
      Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication
      A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR
      Overreach of VAR’s original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game’s fluidity and integrity
      Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to the safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch
      Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards
      Disruption of the Premier League’s fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long
      Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league
      Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption

      If we cannot improve VAR then I don’t see why we shouldn’t get rid because so many fans say it is  spoiling the game they love.Your team scores now and what do you do? You sit on your hands hoping the VAR chappie in Stockley Park hasn’t spotted anything.Beforehand, there was an instant decision from either the ref or his assistant. They got it wrong sometimes — but very rarely — and you could celebrate  like a raving banshee.The stakes are high and every place in the Premier League is worth millions.So yes, I can see the argument that we want to get as many decisions right as possible. But if VAR is not doing that then we should  seriously consider its future.Refs make mistakes and so does VAR. Maybe if VAR was adjudged by ex-players who know the game inside out, there may be an improvement.READ MORE SUN STORIESWho knows better than an ex-player if a handball is deliberate or not? I watched Sky Sports’ coverage in midweek and three ex-players, Wayne Rooney, Roy Keane and Andy Cole, all said, “it’s killing the game”.Fans don’t want it, players past and present don’t want it, so maybe it is time to give VAR the boot. More

    • 275 Shares99 Views

      in Soccer

      Gary Lineker outlines radical proposal to fix VAR that would ‘add to the drama’ as he says ‘I would vote for that’

      by

      GARY LINEKER has suggested a radical idea in order to fix VAR.Premier League clubs are set to vote on the future of the system following a complaint from Wolves.Premier League clubs will vote on the future of VARCredit: ReutersGary Lineker has his own idea of how to fix the systemCredit: AlamyLineker, 63, believes he has the solution to fix the video assistant referee system.The former England striker thinks that an appeal system would help “add to the drama” in football.Speaking on the Rest is Football podcast, Lineker said: “The only way out of this mess, and I think they should keep offside and goal-line technology.”But I think you either scrap the rest of it or, more realistically, you take it to an appeal system.READ MORE ON FOOTBALL”You limit the amount of times that VAR can intervene. It can not intervene unless someone appeals.”It has to be the captain and they have got to tell you what they are appealing for.”It does not mean there is a goal and you have got to find some kind of foul somewhere.”They have to stipulate what the foul is, the captain does it, and if it is a foul then it is a foul, there is no bar.Most read in FootballCASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERS”It is the decision that the VAR and the referee come to.”Maybe one appeal a half, but it stops VAR coming into every possible corner that comes in.”It stops all those things.”You can have 20 seconds to do the appeal and it would add to the drama.”You can get it on the screens and all that kind of stuff.”It won’t be where every single goal is looked at.”Lineker has a different view to the likes of Harry Maguire.The Manchester United defender wants the system to be scrapped for penalties and red cards.Wayne Rooney agrees with Maguire as he wants to see VAR “gone”.VAR: The great debate
      Martin Lipton’s pro VAR view
      FAST forward 12 months to May 18, 2025.
      After 89 minutes at Molineux, Wolves, needing to win their last game of the season to stay up, are beating Manchester United, who require a point for Champions League football.
      A ball over the top sends Rasmus Hojlund racing away. The flag stays down. Hojlund scores. Wolves are relegated.
      And on the way home, the dejected Wolves fans see the still image on their phones.
      Hojlund was 2ft offside. No question. A shocker.It means at least a year in the Championship, £100million income drop, a firesale of the squad. While United bank an extra £50m.
      But it’s OK. Every  one of those fans, plus smiling boss Gary O’Neil and the  Wolves board, will line up to say: “No worries. It’s what we voted for. Rough with the smooth.”
      Yes. And I’ve got a bridge to Ireland to sell you.
      Dan King’s anti VAR view
      THREE cheers and a hearty slap on the back for Wolves chairman Jeff Shi.
      For mentioning the unmentionable,  for speaking commonsense to deaf ears, for proposing that VAR should be scrapped.
      Shi is doomed to failure. His suggestion is unlikely to even go to a vote at next month’s Premier League AGM.
      And if it does get that far, it has a cat in hell’s chance of receiving the two-thirds majority required to carry such a radical proposal.But in one statement on Wednesday, Shi proved that he will be the brightest man in that meeting room.
      He claimed VAR ‘has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand’.
      And he is absolutely spot on.
      The argument against VAR is wide-ranging and yet completely basic.
      If you believe that football is a sport, to be enjoyed in all its spontaneous, high-tempo glory, then you are against VAR.
      If you believe that football is a business, that it is far more important than a mere game, that forensic evidence must be applied, that we must reach the closest point to ultimate justice at all costs — and if you also believe that match-going supporters are irrelevant — then you are in favour of VAR. More

    • 275 Shares159 Views

      in Soccer

      ‘Prime example to get rid of VAR’ moan Newcastle fans as Anthony Gordon shows off gruesome scar after failing to win pen

      by

      OUTRAGED Anthony Gordon joined fans in blasting VAR after suffering a “really sore” injury in a huge penalty controversy.Gordon was left with a nasty heel graze and huge rip in his sock as Sofyan Amrabat floored him in Manchester United’s 3-2 home Premier League win.”I don’t understand what the point of VAR is then” 😳Anthony Gordon vents over VAR and it’s decision to not give Newcastle a penalty ❌ pic.twitter.com/al4CCooNds— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) May 15, 2024

      Amrabat was unpunished for this challenge on GordonCredit: Premier LeagueSky Sports pundit Wayne Rooney was among viewers insisting it should have been a spot-kick – hours after Prem clubs learned they will vote next month on whether to ditch video replays.And Gordon went much further afterwards – delivering a scathing verdict.The winger, who had also fired a brilliant but temporary equaliser, told Sky: “I’ve watched the incident back – it’s a clear penalty.”I don’t mind the referees getting it wrong on the pitch because it’s a difficult decision – things happen very quickly.READ MORE TOP STORIES”But I don’t understand what the point of VAR is then because it’s there to correct mistakes.”He goes down my Achilles and pushed me in the back, then Casemiro comes and gets the ball – but there’s two fouls before that.”Fans were divided on Gordon’s penalty shout – but one observer claimed the saga was a “prime example to get rid of VAR”.The English Euro 2024 hopeful snaked through the middle, with Amrabat trailing in his wake before lunging in.Most read in FootballGordon reckons Amrabat fouled him TWICECredit: Premier LeagueBEST FREE BET SIGN UP OFFERS FOR UK BOOKMAKERSCasemiro – converted from midfield to central defence – then tidied up as Gordon slipped over.Many fans reckon Amrabat DID rake the Toon hero’s heel as he challenged.VAR is ruining football and must be ditched, says 1966 World Cup hero Sir Geoff Hurst – so would it have ruled out THAT goal?One posted: “Clear as day penalty. But will never happen at Old Trafford.”Another wrote: “VAR is once again the star of the show, as Newcastle were denied a penalty after replays showed Amrabat stepping on the back of Gordon.”A third added: “It was a penalty, not gonna lie.”And United legend Rooney said: “I think it’s a penalty. Casemiro does well but Amrabat catches him on his heel.”But other observers argued there was minimal contact – and not enough for a spot-kick.One posted: “Explain why its a penalty please? Casemiro perfectly tackled him and Amrabat grazed him.”Another hit back at pro-penalty protestors by saying: “Literally won the ball but you do you.”Gordon’s injury was clear to seeCredit: Premier League More

    • 250 Shares159 Views

      in Soccer

      Man Utd legend Wayne Rooney leaves Sky Sports studio in stitches with brutal one-word response to news of VAR vote

      by

      WAYNE ROONEY left the Sky Sports studio in stitches with his brutal one-word response to news of Premier League clubs voting to axe VAR.England’s top flight sides stunned their overlords by calling a vote to banish the Video Assistant Referee from the beautiful game.Wayne Rooney had the Sky Sports studio in stitches with his brutal take on VARCredit: X formerly Twitter / @SkySportsPLWolves are leading the way after falling foul of several decisions this season.They formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League today.And in doing so, Wolves have triggered a vote from the 20 clubs on June 6.Fans will now be waiting to see if VAR does bite the dust after five controversial years.READ MORE IN FOOTBALLMany feel its inclusion has sucked the joy out of football, with numerous incorrect decisions also undermining VAR’s effectiveness.And one man who appears keen to see it wiped is Manchester United legend.He raised raucous laughs from the Sky Sports studio when asked if he wanted to see VAR gone.Rooney cheekily responded to host Dave Jones with a brutal one-word reply, answering: “Please.”Most read in FootballBEST FREE BET SIGN UP OFFERS FOR UK BOOKMAKERSRooney continued: “I don’t like being vocal on VAR. If it’s there and it gets all the decisions right, then fair enough.“But it’s taken all the enjoyment out of the game. Having to wait to celebrate a goal, and then getting the decisions wrong, you’re better off letting the referee do it.BREAKING: Marcus Rashford in angry confrontation with fan at Old Trafford as Man Utd warm up for Newcastle clash“They will make mistakes but I’d much rather see it without it.”Fellow pundit Roy Keane then chimed in: “We talk about the decisions more than ever.“Every weekend we talk about them, more so than when there was no VAR. You’d accept the decision, some go for you, some against.“I’ve not been a fan and it slows the game down. It’s frustrating for everyone.”Third pundit Andy Cole added: “I agree. It’s spoilt the game.“There’s too much controversy surrounding it when they said it’s going to make the game better.READ MORE SUN STORIES“For me it’s made the game worse and taken a lot of entertainment out.“Now it’s a video making mistakes, it doesn’t make sense.” More