UEFA

Subterms

    More stories

    • 250 Shares169 Views

      in Soccer

      Uefa set for huge Financial Fair Play revamp due to coronavirus pandemic with clubs allowed to spend more on transfers

      by

      UEFA have admitted that Covid has forced it to fundamentally change Financial Fair Play rules.But there will not be a financial free for all, with new rules put in place.
      Andrea Traverso addressed the EU regarding Uefa’s plansCredit: Getty
      And Euro chiefs want the clubs to help devise a system fit for the post-pandemic world.
      Manchester City’s humiliation of Uefa after winning their appeal against the two season ban for alleged FFP breaches was a significant failure for the system.
      But Uefa insists it is Covid, not City, that has made change required.
      Andrea Traverso, Uefa’s head of financial sustainability told an EU meeting: “The context of football has changed and Covid has further exposed and accelerated the need for reform and discussion.
      “This pandemic brought an unprecedented and unforeseen disruption.
      “The ability of many clubs to operate in the current circumstances and to pay wages and transfer fees, has become very challenging. 
      “Match day revenues, broadcasting, sponsorship have all been affected, causing widespread liquidity shortfalls.
      “Last summer the European transfer market was down by 40 per cent and it was down 56 per cent in January, while wages have risen to an unsustainable 78 per cent of revenues.
      Manchester City won their appeal against a two-season Champions League banCredit: AFP
      FREE BETS: GET OVER £2,000 IN SIGN UP OFFERS HERE

      “Some 200 clubs who were previously profitable now rely on debt and liquidity injections to stay afloat
      “And there is a risk that conditions will worsen – the repercussions will last for a few years.”
      While Traverso insisted FFP had not flopped, with average club debts falling from £50m to £4m, he added: “Rules must always evolve. 
      “They are not set in stone and have to adapt to the context in which clubs operate. This crisis has accelerated the need for that consideration to take place.”
      That will mean the end of the controversial ‘break-even’ rule, limiting losses to just £9m per year, allowing clubs to spend more money without falling foul of Uefa.
      Euro chiefs, though, are ready to look at some form of salary cap regulations, as long as they do not break EU law.
      Traverso said: “The rules need a stronger focus on the present and the future and a stronger focus on the challenges of wages and the transfer market.
      The rules can be different, sure, but that doesn’t mean the rules will be less stringentAndrea Traverso
      “Those who are saying the rules will be abandoned or relaxed are just speculating. 
      “The rules can be different, sure, but that doesn’t mean the rules will be less stringent. On the contrary, serious situations may necessitate stronger actions.
      “But the consultation process has just started.
      “We want and will consult with the EU, member associations, leagues, clubs, players and fans. They all need to have an opportunity to provide feedback.
      “The hope is that we will terminate the consultation process by the end of this year.
      “It is too early to say when, if there is something new, it will kick in. We have to look at the crisis and adapt to these uncertain situations.
      Aleksander Ceferin is aiming to keep the finances of the sport healthyCredit: Getty
      Ceferin attended Man City’s Champions League clash with Shakhtar in 2019 alongside Khaldoon Al MubarekCredit: Getty
      “But I am confident sport will be able to recover quite quickly, maybe quicker than other sectors, even if the effects of the pandemic will last for some time.
      “It is really important that all of us work for the overall interests of football and keep aside selfish views. 
      “During a crisis, people tend to be more self-centric and to protect their business and themselves. 
      “But we need everybody to take a step back and look at it from the position of needing an approach for the interests of the sport.”
      ⚽ Read our Football live blog for the very latest news from around the grounds
      Europa League quarter-final draw sees Arsenal take on Slavia Prague and Man Utd face Granada More

    • 288 Shares139 Views

      in Soccer

      Big Six plan to reduce number of Premier League teams from 20 to 18 to be blocked ahead of shareholder meeting this week

      by

      THE Prem’s Big Six are braced for frustration and disappointment over their attempts to force radical change on the top flight.Leading clubs now recognise there is no chance they can push through a reduction of the league from 20 teams to 18.
      Big Six teams are set to fail in their bid to cut the Premier League to 18 clubsCredit: Getty
      While proposed revamps of Uefa competitions promise more money from 2024, the Big Six fear they will hit a brick wall in their efforts to get the green light to make more cash from selling rights to their own games either overseas or on club channels.
      And it sets up a further squabble between the Big Six and the rest of the Prem starting at tomorrow’s “shareholder” meeting of the 20 clubs.
      Prem chief executive Richard Masters agreed to engage US-based Boston Consulting to carry out a “Strategic Review” of the structure of the League.
      That was a direct response to the Project Big Picture proposals backed by Liverpool and Manchester United as well as EFL chairman Rick Parry.
      Masters vowed that he would be open to all ideas, insisting in November that “the status quo is not an option”.
      Five months on, the Review will finally be a formal agenda item for the first time at Thursday’s meeting, with clubs to debate the “next steps”.
      FREE BETS: GET OVER £2,000 IN SIGN UP OFFERS HERE

      That will see smaller groups meeting together to argue their points.
      But while Masters has met his self-set deadline of reporting back by the end of March, the Big Six believe nothing tangible will come from the process.
      Instead, they expect many of their ideas will be blocked with any changes limited in scope.
      One Big Six source explained: “We were hoping that the impact of Project Big Picture would see a real momentum in favour of significant measures.
      “But it looks more likely that nothing will be proposed that the smaller 14 clubs would be upset about.
      “Of course, we will have to see the final details and that will not come for a few months.
      Richard Masters will chair a key Premier League meeting this weekCredit: Getty

      “What we have been led to believe, though, is that we will not have too much to be happy about.”
      That would be victory for the less wealthy clubs, who were the most angry about Project Big Picture, branding the concept “unacceptable” and “insanity” and forcing United and Liverpool into a public U-turn.
      Behind the scenes, though, the two north west giants, whose interests coincide with the other members of the Big Six who wanted fewer Prem games to create more room for European fixtures, hoped that Boston Consulting would deliver a victory.
      Those hopes have dissipated over the past few months, with the mood of the change supporters darkening but suggests the big boys will have to accept a bitter defeat.
      ⚽ Read our Football live blog for the very latest news from around the grounds

      Man Utd boss Solskjaer says trophies are for egos and it is Premier League which shows real progress for a team More

    • 200 Shares109 Views

      in Soccer

      Cristiano Ronaldo blasted and told to apologise after Champions League blunder by Juventus legend Alessio Tacchinardi

      by

      JUVENTUS star Cristiano Ronaldo has been told to apologise for his role in their Champions League defeat to Porto.
      The 36-year-old cowardly turned his back in the wall, allowing Sergio Oliveira’s free-kick to go through his legs and deceive goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny for the winning goal.

      Ronaldo, 36, is yet to win the Champions League with JuventusCredit: AFP or licensors

      He cowardly turned his back in the wall, allowing Oliveira’s free-kick to go through his legsCredit: EPA

      The demand has come from Alessio Tacchinardi, who played more than 400 games for Juventus between 1994 and 2007.
      He said on TMW Radio: “He [Ronaldo] was rested in last weekend’s game against Lazio, so what was he doing against Porto?
      “Federico Chiesa went to talk on TV, but I would have expected Ronaldo to do so. He has to make an apology to the supporters.”
      With fewer than six minutes remaining in extra-time, Oliveira hit a decent free-kick across the deck.

      If Ronaldo had stood his ground in the wall, it is very unlikely Oliveira’s effort would have got past him.
      Instead, the Portuguese star turned his back and the ball flew through his gaping legs.
      CHELTENHAM FREE BETS: GET £40 IN FREE BETS WITH PADDY POWER

      The tie went on to finish 4-4 on aggregate, with Porto progressing on away goals.

      It is the third time Juventus have failed to win the Champions League since Ronaldo joined the club from Real Madrid in 2018.
      The main reason why the Italian giants signed him was because they wanted to win the prestigious competition.
      The two-time champions haven’t won the Champions League for 25 years, losing five finals since.

      It is believed they will let Ronaldo leave for just £25million in the summer as they look to cut their losses.
      PSG have been linked with the former Manchester United star.
      Real boss Zinedine Zidane has also refused to rule out a potential return to the Bernabeu for Ronaldo.

      Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates 760th career goal helping Juventus to Supercoppa win over Napoli More

    • 175 Shares199 Views

      in Soccer

      EFL chief Rick Parry warns Uefa new Champions League format could decimate English football

      by

      EFL chairman Rick Parry has warned Uefa its Champions League expansion plans risk decimating the fabric of English football.
      European chiefs are set to confirm the new plans to come into effect from 2024 after getting the backing of Europe’s biggest clubs.

      Rick Parry has warned Uefa of the threat faced by smaller clubsCredit: PA:Press Association

      But Parry, who was supported by Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parish, suggested the planned extra 100 Champions League games per season would destroy the League Cup and be potentially fatal for some of English football’s most historic clubs.
      Parry told the European League’s Club Advisory Platform virtual meeting: “The 72 clubs in the EFL are at the heart of their communities
      “The League Cup has been in existence for 60 years and is owned and managed by the EFL.
      “One of the conditions on the formation of the Premier League was that all clubs would play in it.

      “But Uefa proposal poses a major threat to the League Cup, especially with regard to the teams in the Champions League – and it will have a massive effect on EFL revenues
      “We estimate we could lose one third of the revenues we distribute to our clubs – which could pose a very real threat to the existence of those clubs.”
      Parry was echoed by Selhurst chief Parish, who added: “This would have a devastating effect on domestic competitions in England.
      “The League Cup is the largest financial contributor to the EFL and this will be the end of that Cup in its entirety or reduce it to a youth competition.”

      FREE BETS: GET OVER £2,000 IN SIGN UP OFFERS HERE

      Clubs like us feel so remote from the decision-making and there is a huge conflict of interest.
      Steve ParishCrystal Palace chairman

      Uefa have reached agreement with Europe’s biggest clubs that there will be no weekend games in its club competitions, leaving the field clear for domestic leagues.
      The deal effectively kills off the planned European Super League, despite efforts led by Real Madrid to breathe life into the dying embers of the breakaway plan.
      But Prem clubs want to thwart the proposal to play two of the 10 games in the initial league phase of the 36-team Champions League “Swiss model” competition in January.
      Uefa will formally announce the new format next month but Parish also blasted Nyon chiefs and the influential European Club Association for ignoring the voices of those left out of the elite group.
      He said: “Clubs like us feel so remote from the decision-making and there is a huge conflict of interest, with Uefa and the ECA now choosing to make changes for the long term in the middle of a pandemic.
      “We are expected to accept them because they’re not as bad as they could have been.
      “But there will be a huge impact on us and the creep is never ending.“
      Parish and Aston Villa chief executive Christian Purslow also condemned the proposal, backed by the Prem’s ‘Big Six’, for a backdoor safety net to be available for two clubs to qualify for the Champions League through their Uefa coefficient score.

      Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin is set to green light Champions League reformsCredit: REUTERS

      Parry fears for the future of the League Cup if the changes occurCredit: Getty Images – Getty

      The Palace chief said: “If we took it on last season, Leicester were fifth but the two clubs below them [Spurs and Arsenal] would have qualified for the Champions League based on an arbitrary period of success in Europe.”
      Purslow added: “It affects domestic competitions if you boost teams from the Europa League to the Champions League based on what they did in the past.
      “That would give clubs in the Premier League a £45m advantage over a team that may have finished ahead of them. Most people would see that as unfair and not right.”
      ⚽ Read our Football live blog for the very latest news from around the grounds

      PSG vs Barcelona – Watch LIVE for FREE, channel info and kick-off time More

    • 200 Shares129 Views

      in Soccer

      Referee Coltescu banned until end of season for ‘inappropriate behaviour’ after PSG vs Basaksehir ‘racism’ walk-off

      by

      UEFA have banned referee Sebastian Coltescu until the end of the season for ‘inappropriate behaviour’ during Paris Saint-Germain’s Champion’s League clash with Istanbul Basaksehir last December.
      Coltescu, who was the fourth official in the match, found himself at the centre of a racism storm for his role in the dismissal of Basaksehir’s assistant coach Pierre Webo.

      UEFA have suspended Sebastian Coltescu until the end of the seasonCredit: AFP or licensors

      The Romanian referred to the former Cameroon international as ‘the black one’.
      His comments sparked a furious reaction from Basaksehir hitman Demba Ba, who accused him of racism.
      Webo himself fumed at the Romanian before he was ordered away from the touchline.
      In a show of solidarity, PSG players joined their opponents by walking off the pitch.

      European football’s governing body launched an immediate investigation into the matter.
      And in a statement on Monday, they announced the suspension of the official.
      CASINO SIGN UP OFFER: CLAIM UP TO £800 IN CASINO BONUS CASH

      Just seven players have managed to score a hat-tricks of CL hat-tricks
      In their statement, UEFA revealed Coltescu had been suspended for ‘inappropriate behaviour during a UEFA match for which he was appointed.’

      Additionally, UEFA have ordered Coltescu to ‘attend an educational programme before 30 June 2021.’
      The players’ decision to walk off the pitch led to the abandonment of their Champions League Group H match.
      The fixture, which PSG eventually won 5-1, ended up being played the following day.

      Demba Ba accused Sebastian Coltescu of racismCredit: AFP or licensors

      Immediately after the match, Coltescu took to social media to issue an apology for his comments.
      He tweeted: “Racism was never my intention.
      “In such an environment, people sometimes cannot properly express their feelings and can be misunderstood.
      “I apologise in the name of the UEFA Champions League.”

      Sebastian Coltescu issued an apology for his actions shortly after the matchCredit: AFP or licensors
      According to Spanish newspaper Marca, Coltescu claimed his comments on the touchline had been misinterpreted.
      He reportedly said: “I just try to be good.
      “I’m not going to read any news sites these next few days.
      “Anyone who knows me knows that I’m not racist! At least that’s what I hope.”

      Demba Ba accuses official of racism as Istanbul Basaksehir leave pitch against PSG in protest More

    • 275 Shares99 Views

      in Soccer

      England boost in hosting all of Euro 2020 as Uefa’s chief medic says he cannot guarantee all 12 countries can have games

      by

      UEFA’S chief medic has conceded he cannot “100 per cent guarantee” all 12 planned hosts will be able to stage Euro 2020 games – opening the door for more matches in England.
      PM Boris Johnson told The Sun he had invited Euro bosses to move more games and even the entire tournament to England this summer.

      Boris Johnson is hoping to host all of Euro 2020 in the UKCredit: Getty Images – Getty

      Covid expert Daniel Koch gave the UK reason for optimismCredit: AFP – Getty

      SunSport revealed how Uefa chiefs are demanding all potential host cities confirm that fans will be allowed in grounds.
      So far, three of the 12 have been unable to make the promise, with only a month left until Uefa’s April 7 deadline.
      And in another boost for the prospects of extra games being moved to English soil in addition to the seven already scheduled for Wembley, Uefa’s Covid expert Daniel Koch admitted some of the planned hosts might not be able to put games on.
      Koch said: “We first of all have to discuss the situation with all the cities and all the countries too, because it is the Government that will decide what is possible.

      “There will be differences from place to place but that is not a problem.
      “If nothing can take place in one country, there are 11 others in which preparations are already under way.”
      Concerns within the Irish Government means there are growing fears that Dublin, which would host England’s last 16 clash if Gareth Southgate’s men win their initial group, may have to pull out.
      There are also issues elsewhere.

      Ten English stadiums are on standby to host the entirety of this summer’s delayed European Championship
      FREE BETS: GET OVER £2,000 IN SIGN UP OFFERS HERE

      Despite a proposal for 50 per cent capacities at Munich’s Allianz Arena German officials have yet to clear any fans being allowed into venues, with similar concerns in Italy, Spain and potentially Scotland.
      Koch added: “Preparing for a Euros in 12 countries is a difficulty but also an opportunity.
      “But in a pandemic, there can be no such thing as a 100 per cent guarantee because there is always the prospect of surprises.

      We will not make a decision on fans before April
      Daniel Koch

      “For the moment, I am very confident that the Euros will be held this summer, as the epidemic situation cannot be compared to what we faced in the winter.
      “That is why we will not make a decision on fans before April.
      “What we feel, though, is that going to see events, not just sporting ones, is a legitimate necessity for people.
      “That is why we are looking at ways to allow it at the Euros, although we will not take any irresponsible risks.”
      ⚽ Read our Football live blog for the very latest news from around the grounds

      England boss Gareth Southgate backs bid to stage Euro 2020 matches in UK More

    • 250 Shares179 Views

      in Soccer

      Boris Johnson’s offer to host all of Euro 2020 welcomed by European football chiefs with 10 English stadiums on standby

      by

      BORIS JOHNSON’S offer to stage the whole of Euro 2020 has been welcomed by European football chiefs.
      Wembley is already due to stage SEVEN games at the tournament, including all three of England’s opening group matches, both semi-finals and the July 11 final.

      Ten English stadiums are on standby to host the entirety of this summer’s delayed European Championship

      But the PM’s invitation, exclusively revealed by The Sun, has opened the way for the ultimate summer of football across the country.
      One source told The Sun: “It is great for us that England is so keen to play its part this summer.”
      European football’s governing body Uefa plans to confirm the schedule for this summer’s delayed tournament by April 7.
      That is the date Euro bosses have ordered the current 12 planned host cities to confirm their willingness to host games.

      But Uefa is demanding that ALL hosts commit to staging games with fans inside grounds.
      The Government announced last week that all Covid restrictions will be ended from June 21, opening the way for Wembley to allow a 90,000 full house in for the finale of the tournament.
      That adds to the growing prospect of more matches being played on English soil.
      At a video meeting held by Uefa chiefs last week, it was made clear that opening the turnstiles was an absolute condition for matches to be held in the proposed cities.

      FREE BETS: GET OVER £2,000 IN SIGN UP OFFERS HERE

      Boris Johnson has offered the UK as a host for the entire delayed Euro 2020 tournamentCredit: 2021 Getty Images

      EURO 2020: How many fans will be allowed in stadiums?

      UEFA initially asked all host cities to rank their preferred options for crowds numbers.

      They ranged from full houses down to no supporters.
      But the roll out of the vaccine has changed the stance of Euro chiefs, who are now determined to see the turnstiles at least partially opened.
      Last week’s Government announcement would allow crowds of up to 10,000 for the first two England group games, against Croatia and then Scotland.
      Subsequent matches would see no further restrictions, meaning 90,000 fans could be allowed in to Wembley.
      But it is expected that pleas from the FA to let more fans in might be met with a positive response.
      That could mean 30 per cent of the Wembley capacity – adding up to 27,000 per match, for the group games, with attendances then being increased.
      Uefa are happy with the idea of two tiers of fan thresholds as long as the number of fans increases.
      But hosts will not be allowed to start with one capacity and then reduce it.
      And that us why the upbeat assessment and plans by the Government have been welcomed by Uefa and its high command.

      As well as Wembley, matches are due to be played at Hampden Park in Glasgow, Dublin, Amsterdam, Bilbao, Bucharest, Budapest, Copenhagen, Munich, Rome, St Petersburg, and the Azerbaijan capital Baku.
      So far, only nine cities have been able to give Uefa that commitment, conditional on Covid restrictions being eased.

      Dublin appears to be one of the venues in doubt, with Jonathan Hill, head of the FA of Ireland, admitting the issues being faced.
      He said: “We know we can deliver fans safely into the Aviva Stadium, so it is a question of how many we can deliver.
      “We are having those conversations with Uefa but they have real people who have bought real tickets.
      “At some point soon they are going to have to take decisions in relation to the structure of the tournament.”
      But despite the confident promises of the nine countries, the concerns of the Irish Government are also shared by Italy, Spain and Germany among other countries.
      None of those three nations have yet even suggested a roadmap which will allow the return of fans, in stark contrast to the pathway offered by the vaccine roll-out in England.

      Ten stadiums are on standby to host Euro 2020 and welcome fans in the processCredit: PA:Empics Sport
      Uefa chiefs are huge fans of Wembley, which has already hosted two Champions League Finals since it was reopened in 2007 and will also stage European club football’s biggest match in 2024.
      The Swiss-based body was also hugely grateful to the FA when it agreed to take on the four games which were initially due to be hosted by Brussels when the format of the tournament was announced in 2012.
      Now English football could come to the rescue of Europe again if Uefa accepts it cannot hold the tournament as planned as a result of the pandemic.
      If next month’s decision is to ask the FA to stage the entire event it could see Old Trafford and the Etihad Stadium in Manchester used.
      Anfield in Liverpool, Villa Park in Birmingham and both St James’ Park in Newcastle and Sunderland’s Stadium of Light could also be used.
      In the capital, Wembley could be one of four venues.
      The Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, Arsenal’s Emirates and the London Stadium used by West Ham are the other three.

      England World Cup 2030 bid gets Boris Johnson’s backing More

    • 225 Shares149 Views

      in Soccer

      Fifa planted ‘the law of the jungle’ trees they now wish to bulldoze with new regulations for agents

      by

      FIFA describe the current power of football agents as “the law of the jungle” with “conflicts of interests rife and exorbitant ‘commissions’ being earned left and right”.
      Bearing in mind football agents earned £470million in fees in 2019 — four times more than in 2015 — it’s not hard to see how they have come to this conclusion.

      Daniel Kinahan is entering the world of football as an agent

      The irony is that it was Fifa who planted the trees that they now wish to bulldoze to the ground, with what look like suitable new regulations for agents.
      This includes caps on fees, more transparency, a licensing system, avoiding conflicts of interest and maintaining high professional standards, all of which should benefit everyone involved in the game.
      But hold on there…
      The rewards of being an agent are so remunerative that others are emerging from the darkness wanting a piece of the action — and I wonder if any kind of reforms will hold them back.

      Alleged drugs chieftain Daniel Kinahan is expanding his sporting management operation MTK Global from boxing into football.
      Kinahan’s record persuaded Irish police in the High Court to name the 43-year-old as a drugs lord and crime boss in his native Dublin.
      “I’ve no criminal record anywhere in the world,” he pleads. But then neither does Vladimir Putin.
      World heavyweight champion Tyson Fury vouched what a nice chap Kinahan is — and no doubt he is very good to his mother.

      Kinahan has previously worked with Tyson FuryCredit: Reuters
      But that is a long, long way from a recommendation that he should glide unchallenged into football.
      The British Boxing Board of Control don’t like his alleged links with crime but say they can do nothing about it.
      They don’t explain why not — after all, they are the governing body for boxing. And what’s the point of having ‘Control’ in your title if you have none?
      So, of all the reforms proposed by Fifa, “maintaining high professional standards” will be the most difficult to translate into an actual regulation. But it is perhaps the most important.
      Representing football players and their careers should only be done by people who protect the integrity of football, prevent abuses and who genuinely have their players’ best interests at heart.
      And as administrators of the game, we need to ensure Fifa award licenses to agents who can and will do this.
      I understand and respect the fact players need to get as much from a short career as they possibly can.
      They are professionals who hold all the hopes and fortunes of our football clubs in their hands, and they deserve every penny they get.
      So I do worry about the influence and characters of the people who want to get the closest to them.
      If this Irishman’s plans do not put a rocket up the underpants of Fifa-dom, it should.

      And where are the PFA in all this? Are they not concerned about having characters like this representing the players? Are they not lobbying to prevent such types getting licenses to represent their union members?
      On the subject of the PFA, it’s hard to understand what role they play in football any more.
      They represent some of the most influential people on the planet (step forward Marcus Rashford) and their union members are keeping the whole country from going off their rockers during lockdown by continuing to play football.
      The PFA should have prestige, power, influence and a mandate for good. They should be driving the discussion on diversity and inclusion in the country by using the power of football to drive positive social change. Their values should represent the high ones set by the players themselves.
      They should be leading on every issue that affects the players, from education, financial planning, social media abuse, dementia, mental health and . . . who can and should represent them.
      When, oh when, is their reform going to happen?

      Eddie Hearn says he was ‘a little surprised’ by the uproar over Daniel Kinahan being praised by Tyson Fury More