More stories

  • in

    Chelsea star banned from driving after racking up more points on license than Man Utd have in Premier League

    CHELSEA star Wesley Fofana has been banned from driving for two years after racking up 47 points on his licence.The French international’s tally would see him finish higher than several Premier League giants this season — including Manchester United, who sit on 39 points.Wesley Fofana has been banned from driving for two years after racking up 47 points on his licenceCredit: AlamyFofana was then caught five times behind the wheel of his £300,000 Rolls-Royce CullinanCredit: AlamyLavender Hill magistrates’ court in South West London heard on Wednesday that he had committed eight offences in three different vehicles in less than a year.Fofana, 24, who did not appear at court, was dubbed a “habitual speeder” by chairman of the bench John Soones, who slapped the defender with a further 38 points on top of his previous nine.Mr Soones said: “We take into account the fact he is a habitual speeder, with access to powerful motor cars, who speeds at nearly double the speed limit.”The earliest offence was last March when he drove his Lamborghini Urus at 26mph in a 20mph zone in Brixton, South London.READ MORE FOOTBALL NEWSFofana was then caught five times behind the wheel of his £300,000 Rolls-Royce Cullinan and twice in his blue 4.0-litre Audi — all in a 50mph zone on the A3 Esher bypass.He hit speeds of up to 88mph on the route he regularly uses to get to and from his home in Kingston-upon-Thames to the club’s training ground in Cobham, Surrey.Fofana, who admitted all offences, had so many they were scattered throughout the building’s courtrooms. Chairman Mr Soones said: “He’s got a flush. He is in court one, two and three. But we have gathered them all together”.Most read in FootballHis lawyer Imogen Cox told the court: “He is a young man that plays football for a living and he works extremely hard, training, and has foolishly not complied with the rules of the road.”Fofana was fined £5,328, plus a £2,131 victim surcharge and £110 in costs. Chelsea player ratings: Enzo Fernandez silences his doubters but Robert Sanchez endures a few shaky moments vs LeicesterHe was previously disqualified for six months in January 2023 for speeding.The player is regarded as a “sick note” by Chelsea fans due to long absences after two major knee injuries since his £70million switch from Leicester City in 2022. More

  • in

    England star admits speeding SIX TIMES in just two months as he’s banned from driving

    AN ENGLAND star has admitted to speeding six times in just two months as he is banned from driving. The footballer was slapped with a £3,996 fine and handed three points for each offence at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court this week.English football star Morgan Gibbs-White has been banned from drivingCredit: Shutterstock EditorialThe Nottingham Forest and England midfielder racked up six offences in two monthsCredit: Shutterstock EditorialGirlfriend and influencer Britney De Villiers and Morgan Gibbs-White enjoyed New Years on a ski tripCredit: Instagram / @britneydevilliersNottingham Forest and England midfielder Morgan Gibbs-White, 25, has had his license revoked for six months after pleading guilty at the sentencing hearing on Monday.The athlete rocketed over the 70mph limit on a dual carriageway and confessed to exceeding a strict 60mph cap on other occasions.Gibbs-White was even captured doing a staggering 96mph between Stragglethorpe Road and Lings Bar Road – committing yet another speeding offence.He was also spotted speeding twice on December 5 at 1.02am and 7.13pm and again on Christmas Day at 9.18am.Read more SportInitially, the footy star was told he’d have to cough up an eye-watering £6,000 for his offences but the price was slashed after he eventually pleaded guilty.The penalties were dropped to £666 and he was told to pay an additional £1,598 victim surcharge and £110 in court costs.He also faced 19 penalty points on his license – a sizeable amount given that most drivers face a ban if they accumulate 12 points on their license within a three year period.Gibbs-White was celebrated for keeping Nottingham Forest afloat in the first two years back in the Premier League.Most read in FootballHe signed to the club on a 5-year-contract with a transfer fee which was reportedly worth £25 million. There was also an additional £17 million on the table for add-ons. Pep Guardiola aims sly dig at rivals Man Utd hours after their heroic Europa League comeback In May 28, 2023, he was voted Nottingham Forest Player of the Season as his star continued to rise. His successful streak put him on the radar for Manchester City’s radar.Reportedly, a move is in the works for the star to replace departing club legend Kevin de Bruyne.However, Forest have reportedly slapped a £100m price tag on the England midfielder, who has five goals and nine assists in 34 Prem games this term.The club was in the to five for most of the campaign but has since slid down to seventh. Gibbs-White described the slump as “just frustrating.”He said: “We’re new to it but we still fighting and building as a team and a club.”It’s been a tough season, very demanding especially when we’ve put ourselves in the positions we have.Read More on The Sun”I can’t put a reason on it. “Fatigue? Tiredness? But we can’t make excuses because the fans deserve better – we can’t concede goals like we did here, it’s just frustrating.”The star regularly shares pictures with his partner Britney De Villiers on social mediaCredit: Instagram/@Britney De VilliersGibbs-White signed to Nottingham Forest for £25 millionCredit: Instagram / officialnffc More

  • in

    Ex-Prem assistant ref jailed after luring man to flat, locking him inside and raping him

    AN ex-Premier League assistant referee has been jailed for raping a man. Steven Wilson, 55, lured the stranger from a taxi rank to his flat by promising to take him to a party with “a lot of girls”. He locked him in and forced him to perform a sex act before raping him in 2009 in Worcester. Wilson evaded justice until 2021. The victim recognised him from an article about his other sex crimes and told cops. Wilson, of Rowley Regis, West Mids, was found guilty of rape and sexual assault at Worcester crown court. READ MORE FOOTBALL NEWSHe was jailed for nine years. Previously known as Stephen Dorr, he was promoted to the Prem referee roster in 2005. In 2009, it emerged he had downloaded indecent images and communicated with underage boys. He was jailed for 15 months in 2011 for sexual offences involving teenage boys. Most read in Footballpeaking after the sentencing, Detective Constable Chris Hawkes, of West Mercia Police, said: “Wilson’s victim was incredibly scared during his time trapped in his flat and feared for his safety as he did not know Wilson, or what he was capable of. “His awful ordeal lasted for three or four hours as it was light outside when Wilson eventually allowed him to leave the flat. “We are pleased to get this court result for Wilson who subjected his victim to a degrading and humiliating ordeal back in 2009.”Former Premier League assistant referee Steven Wilson has been jailed for raping a manCredit: West Mercia PoliceScandal-hit Premier League ref David Coote SACKED after videos emerged of anti-Klopp rant and snorting white powder More

  • in

    Female footballer, 18, who was banned by FA for trans comment wants body to apologise after case folded

    A TEENAGE girl footballer banned for asking a bearded transgender opponent “Are you a man?” wants the FA to apologise after the case folded.Cerys Vaughan, 18, raised safety and fairness concerns during a friendly.Cerys Vaughan, 18, raised safety and fairness concerns during a friendlyCredit: BBC SportAnti-discrimination watchdog Kick It Out complained and Cerys, then 17, was charged with breaching FA rules. Vaughan, of Leigh Genesis FC in Gtr Manchester, was banned for six matches, with four suspended for a year.She appealed against the decision and an FA board ruled the hearing “unfair” and dismissed the case. It came after the FA said transgender players would be barred from June 1 following a Supreme Court ruling that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex.Read More on UK NewsCerys said: “I’d like the FA to apologise for the way they treated me. “It was stressful and in the end pointless.“If the new ruling was in place when I asked the original question I’d never have been punished.” The FA said it dropped the case after the complainant withdrew for personal reasons.Most read in SportTrans ruling victory hides a terrifying reality – for years, women have been demonised simply for pointing out biological fact More

  • in

    Boxer Tyson Fury’s dad John faces trial over claims he drove down closed motorway lane

    BOXER Tyson Fury’s dad faces trial next year over claims he drove down a closed motorway lane.Ex-bare knuckle fighter John, 59, is accused of ignoring signs it was shut for safety reasons.Ex-bare knuckle fighter John Fury faces trial next yearCredit: GettyJohn was in his son’s corner when Tyson lost his first world titles fight with Ukraine’s Oleksandr Usyk last MayCredit: APHis 1992 Mercedes 190E was picked up by a camera on a smart section of the M6 between Keele and Stoke last July.Smart motorways, which operate without a hard shoulder, have displays above each lane indicating if it is open.If it is closed, the screen displays a red ‘X’, with all traffic forced to move across.He was charged via post but is said to have failed to give details to Staffordshire Police about who was driving.READ MORE ON TYSON FURYMr Fury, of Wilmslow Cheshire, did not appear at North Staffordshire Justice Centre yesterday.But the prosecution said he had submitted a hand-written plea of not guilty to two offences.A trial date was set for February 23 next year.A Staffordshire Police spokesman said: “John Fury has been charged with failing to comply with red/green arrow/lane closure signals and failing to give information relating to the identification of a driver when required.Most read in Boxing”This follows an incident on the M6 southbound between junctions 15 and 14, on 14 July 2024.”The charges were sent on 7 January 2025.”Fury pleaded not guilty, and a trial date has been set at the North Staffordshire Justice Centre on 23 February 2026.Fury was in his son’s corner when Tyson lost his first world titles fight with Ukraine’s Oleksandr Usyk last May.Tommy Fury’s dad John made cruel comment about her ‘not being a wife’ – appearing to predict split YEARS before break up More

  • in

    Former Olympic medallist Fred Kerley arrested for ‘punching ex in the face’ as he withdraws from Grand Slam Track

    AMERICAN sprinter Fred Kerley withdrew from the Grand Slam Track after being arrested for allegedly punching a former girlfriend in the face.The 2022 world 100 metres champion had been due to run twice in the second leg of Michael Johnson’s new track league in Miami.Fred Kerley won an Olympic 100m silver in 2020 and a bronze in 2024Credit: ReutersHe is alleged to have assaulted US hurdler Alaysha JohnsonCredit: AFPKerley was due to have run against Britain’s Zharnel HughesCredit: GettyBut the two-time Olympic 100 metres medallist was detained by police last Thursday.it follows allegations he attacked Texan hurdler Alaysha Johnson, 28, at a South Florida hotel.CBS News Miami reported that 29-year-old Kerley, 29, was charged with battery.And at his bond court appearance on Friday, he was granted a $1,000 bond.READ MORE IN SPORTRichard Cooper, Kerley’s attorney, said: “We ask Fred’s sponsors, fans, and the public for patience and respect as we let the State Attorney conduct his investigation.“We are confident that this case will be summarily dismissed shortly.”Kerley was set to run against Britain’s Zharnel Hughes over both sprint distances but he was absent from the start lines.It is not known if he will run in legs three and four in Philadelphia and LA.Most read in AthleticsPolice issued this picture of top athlete KerleyCredit: ReutersA spokesperson for the Grand Slam Track said: “Fred Kerley was arrested (on Thursday).“The matter is under active investigation, and all inquiries should be directed to the Broward County Sheriff’s Office.“Fred will not compete this weekend. We have no further comment at this time.” Texan star Kerley has personal bests of 9.76secs and 19.76s for the 100m and 200m respectively.He’s also clocked the 10th fastest 400m in history, with 43.64s. More

  • in

    FA bosses MUST apologise for treatment of women forced to compete against biological men & punished if they complained

    FA chiefs finally red-carded trans players from women’s football yesterday.Biological men will be banned from all levels of the women’s game from June 1. FA bosses are facing demands to apologise for the treatment of women and girls forced to compete against biological menTrans goalie Blair Hamilton, circled, joined a women’s teamTrans Radio UK, made up solely of trans women, played against Dulwich Hamlet WomenCredit: AlamyFA bosses are facing demands to apologise for the treatment of women and girls forced to compete against biological men — and punished if they complained.They finally acted following last month’s Supreme Court ruling that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex.The decision affects around 20 trans footballers registered at grassroots level.Olympic swimming star Sharron Davies, who has led a ten-year fight to stop biological men taking part in women’s sport, told The Sun she was delighted, and disgusted, by the FA’s “too little, too late” move.READ MORE UK NEWSShe said: “I’ve heard all kinds of heartbreaking stories — women saying they just can’t compete with men who’ve ruined the enjoyment of their sport.’Sense has prevailed’“It’s crazy and I’m pleased to see sense has finally prevailed (in football) but I won’t rest until men are barred from all female sport.”Sharron told of her fury that the FA has yet to apologise to an autistic girl, 17, banned six games for asking a “bearded” opponent: “Are you a man?”She denied being transphobic and said she was concerned for her safety. Sharron added: “The FA owes this girl an apology and all the women forced to compete against men.Most read in Football“The FA have misrepresented the Equality Act, which has not actually changed, and have been sanctioning legalised cheating for years in ­pursuit of a woke agenda.”FA rules reviewed on April 1 had allowed the 20 or so trans players to carry on playing if their testosterone levels were below a set level for at least 12 months.But chiefs sparked confusion by saying they could intervene if concerns were raised about safety and fairness.Trans women are NOT women, Supreme Court rules in win for anti-woke campaigners after battle over female-only spacesFiona McAnena, of campaign group Sex Matters, said of yesterday’s new ruling: “This is welcome but long overdue.“The FA has had ample evidence of the harm to women and girls caused by its nonsensical policy of letting men who identify as women play in women’s teams.“The requirement to lower their testosterone tells you that everyone knew they were not women.“Thankfully, the UK Supreme Court has now confirmed this.“Every other sporting body now needs to re-establish a genuine women’s category, and this shameful period in history will finally be brought to an end.”My experience is playing in the men’s game, ten to 15 years ago it wasn’t a safe place to be transgender or non-conforming in any wayNatalie WashingtonTory MP Sir John Hayes added: “This is a victory for common sense. Sporting competition needs to be fair and farce had replaced fairness.”In a 2022 “world first”, Trans Radio UK, a team of solely trans women, played their first game against Dulwich Hamlet Women.Last September Sutton United women’s team postponed their fixture against Ebbsfleet United after a row over the signing of trans goalie Blair Hamilton.In November 2023 trans player Francesca Needham quit Rossington Main Ladies FC in South Yorkshire and claimed she suffered discrimination after opponents refused to play against her.Olympic swimming star Sharron Davies, who has led a ten-year fight to stop biological men taking part in women’s sportCredit: AlamyLast night Natalie Washington, of Football v Transphobia, told how trans players have said they could give up the game from June 1.Natalie said: “Most don’t feel they can play in the men’s game for reasons of safety and comfort.“My experience is playing in the men’s game, ten to 15, years ago it wasn’t a safe place to be transgender or non-conforming in any way.“That’s probably improved slightly but it’s still not a great place to be.”’Biology matters’The FA said: “We understand this will be difficult for people who simply want to play the game they love in the gender by which they identify.“We are contacting the registered transgender players to explain the changes and how they can continue to stay involved in the game.”Asked about an apology to biologically female players, the FA said: “We’ve no further comment.”Read More on The SunDowning Street insisted “biology matters” when it comes to women’s sport and “everyone should be compliant with the law”.Other sports could follow the FA’s lead. The English Cricket Board currently allows for self-identification at all levels. But chiefs could confirm a policy change today.APOLOGY BY POLICEBy Andy RobinsonPOLICE have apologised after investigating a fan who was banned by Newcastle United for expressing gender-critical views.Linzi Smith, 34, was accused of being transphobic by a complainant who claimed trans people would not feel safe sitting near her at St James’ Park.She promotes lesbian, bisexual and women’s rights online.Northumbria Police launched a hate crime probe after being handed a dossier by the club.Linzi was interviewed for two hours under caution in 2023 and eventually faced no further action.The force now says elements of the probe were unacceptable. Linzi said: “I can’t help but feel let down over so many failings.”Newcastle fan Linzi Smith was accused of being transphobicCredit: LInzi Smith More

  • in

    FA will BAN trans women from women’s football next season after ‘win for common sense’ Supreme Court ruling

    ENGLAND’S FA will ban transgender women from women’s football clubs next season.Last month, the Supreme Court ruled that trans women are not legally women in a move hailed as a “victory for common sense”.Women celebrate outside the Supreme Court in LondonCampaigners from For Women Scotland (FWS) outside the Supreme CourtCredit: EPANHS trusts will be hit with lawsuits for millions of pounds if they fail to protect single-sex female spaces, a lawyer warnsThe FA – who previously allowed trans women to compete in the women’s league – have now said they’re “changing their policy”.In a statement today, it said: “As the governing body of the national sport, our role is to make football accessible to as many people as possible, operating within the law and international football policy defined by UEFA and FIFA.”Our current policy, which allows transgender women to participate in the women’s game, was based on this principle and supported by expert legal advice.”This is a complex subject, and our position has always been that if there was a material change in law, science, or the operation of the policy in grassroots football then we would review it and change it if necessary.read more football news”The Supreme Court’s ruling on the 16 April means that we will be changing our policy. Transgender women will no longer be able to play in women’s football in England, and this policy will be implemented from 1 June 2025.”We understand that this will be difficult for people who simply want to play the game they love in the gender by which they identify, and we are contacting the registered transgender women currently playing to explain the changes and how they can continue to stay involved in the game.”In April, the Supreme Court confirmed the terms “woman” and “sex” in the 2010 Equality Act “refer to a biological woman and biological sex”.The landmark judgment was hailed as a “victory for common sense” by top politicians and feminist campaigners.Most read in FootballAnd the PM, who has previously said “trans women are women”, finally admitted that a woman is an “adult female” after years of woke dithering.In a statement today, Downing Street added that “biology matters” in women’s sport.Trans women are NOT women, Supreme Court rules in win for anti-woke campaigners after battle over female-only spacesAsked about the FA’s decision, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said on Thursday: “We have been clear that biology matters when it comes to women’s sport and that everyone should be compliant with the law.”We will continue to work to ensure women and girls across the country can enjoy sports, and we will continue to support the bodies to protect the integrity, fairness and safety of the game.”He added: “It’s up to the individual sporting bodies to set their own policies.”It comes after Kemi Badenoch labelled Sir Keir a “weather vane who twists in the wind” as she claimed he “doesn’t have the balls” to express his views on gender.And Harry Potter author Rowling hit out against the PM branding him a “coward”.Last month, Baroness Kishwer Falkner, who chairs the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, suggested that clubs at professional and grassroots level must respect the Supreme Court’s ruling that female-only spaces are protected on the basis of biology.Asked if it was now simple that trans women cannot take part in women’s sport, Baroness Falkner told the BBC: “Yes, it is.”Lord Seb Coe, the president of World Athletics hailed the court for having “produced clarity”.He said: “Most importantly, I think it really does support women, in places for them that really matter.”It is really important that we continue to protect the integrity of women’s competition.”The row over trans women in women’s sports has exploded in recent years, with growing calls to protect fairness for female athletes.Critics say letting biological males compete against women creates an uneven playing field, especially in strength-based sports.KEY POINTS ABOUT RULINGTHE UK’s highest court unanimously ruled the terms “woman” and “sex” as set down in UK law “refer to a biological woman and biological sex”.Judges ruled having aGender Recognition Certificate stating a trans woman is female does not mean that person should be treated as a woman under the UK 2010 Equality Act.This means trans women with a GRC can be excluded from single-sex spaces if “proportionate”.The ruling will apply to spaces such as changing rooms, homeless hostels or domestic violence refuges. NHS guidance on who can be placed on same-sex wards is also now likely to be changed. The current document, set out in 2019, states: “Trans people should be accommodated according to their presentation: the way they dress, and the name and pronouns they currently use.”One option is for transgender people to be placed in rooms on their own. Trans people still retain legal protections and cannot be discriminated against, but they cannot acquire protections reserved for women.In 2022, British Cycling faced fury after allowing trans rider Emily Bridges to race in the women’s category — a move blocked by governing body UCI at the last minute.Swimmer Sharron Davies, who won Olympic silver for Team GB, has been one of the most vocal campaigners against what she calls “female erasure” in sport.She and other female athletes argue their years of hard work have been undermined by rules that favour inclusion over fairness.Several UK sporting bodies, including World Athletics and Swim England, have since tightened rules to reserve elite female competition for biological women only.Supporters of the changes say it’s common sense — and long overdue.Britain’s equality watchdog is rushing to rewrite its rulebook after the court ruling shook up the law on sex and gender.The Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) says it’ll urgently update its guidance — as ministers face mounting pressure to spell out what the verdict means for schools, hospitals and workplaces.Baroness Kishwer Falkner, who chairs the EHRC, said the impact of the ruling “cannot be overstated” and vowed a rapid review of the watchdog’s advice to reflect the fresh legal clarity.The equalities chief pledged to crack down on any organisation ignoring the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling.She said the ruling is “enormously consequential” and offers clarity — meaning trans women, even with a Gender Recognition Certificate, can be excluded from women-only spaces if “proportionate”.On sport, she told Radio 4: “Yes, it is” now simple that trans women can’t compete in female categories.Read More on The SunShe said changing rooms must be based on biological sex, adding: “If a male person is allowed to use a women-only service, it becomes a mixed-sex space.”Baroness Falkner also said the NHS must scrap its 2019 policy on trans patients and follow the ruling, with “no confusion” left about what the law requires.Transgender women will be banned from the next season of women’s football in EnglandCredit: Getty More