Raphael Stevens

More stories

  • 100 Shares179 Views

    in Soccer

    Qui a commandité l'agression d'une footballeuse du PSG?

    L’agression de la footballeuse du PSG a choqué les esprits: attaquants masqués, barre métallique, sa coéquipière Aminata Diallo arrêtée. Ces dernières semaines, de nouveaux éléments sont venus bouleverser la première version de l’histoire.VERSAILLES — La nuit est déjà tombée quand Aminata Diallo franchit le fronton de béton de l’Hôtel de Police pour quitter le bâtiment. 36 heures plus tôt, des agents de police ont frappé à la porte de son appartement, l’ont tirée de son sommeil, et l’ont emmenée en garde à vue.Enfin libérée, Aminata Diallo, milieu de terrain de l’équipe féminine du PSG, fait défiler les centaines de messages qu’elle a reçus. Elle tombe des nues. Inconnue quelques jours plus tôt en dehors du petit monde du football féminin français, son nom fait la Une des journaux aux quatre coins de la planète.Selon la presse, Aminata Diallo est celle qui, un mois plus tôt, conduisait la voiture depuis laquelle une de ses coéquipières avait été tirée du siège passager et agressée par un homme masqué. Toujours selon la presse, elle-même s’en était sortie indemne, alors que sa coéquipière et amie Kheira Hamraoui avait été frappée à coups de barre métallique. Aminata Diallo est donc celle qu’on a interrogée, non pas comme témoin, mais comme suspecte de ce qui, selon la police, pouvait être un coup monté.Avec ses relents de jalousie sportive, sa ressemblance avec l’affaire Tonya Harding et ses liens avec le PSG (champion de France en titre et l’un des clubs de foot les plus riches au monde), l’affaire a rapidement fait le tour de la planète.Mais plus on en apprend — sur une histoire d’infidélité conjugale, sur des accusations à l’encontre d’autres joueuses de l’équipe, et sur des coups de fil à d’autres joueuses médisant sur la victime avant l’agression — plus la première version de l’histoire est remise en cause.Aujourd’hui, plus personne ne sait qui croire. Ni quoi.Un dossier en suspensAminata Diallo, convaincue que sa garde à vue était une erreur de la police, a refusé de se faire assister d’un avocat lors de ses interrogatoires.Loic Baratoux/Abaca/Sipa USA, via AP ImagesPlus de trois semaines se sont écoulées depuis qu’Aminata Diallo, 26 ans, quittait le commissariat de Versailles après deux jours d’interrogatoires et une nuit passée dans une cellule minuscule et nauséabonde. L’enquête se poursuit, mais la police semble loin de comprendre qui, ou quoi, est derrière cette agression qui a eu lieu le 4 novembre. dans une rue sombre de Chatou, en banlieue parisienne.Certains faits sont indiscutables. Kheira Hamraoui, 31 ans, a été victime d’un grave délit. Aminata Diallo a été interrogée puis relâchée. Aucun des agresseurs n’a été identifié. Aucune arme n’a été retrouvée. Et personne n’a été accusé du crime.Mais en enquêtant sur les semaines tumultueuses qui ont suivi l’agression, le New York Times a aussi découvert que Kheira Hamraoui a plusieurs fois laissé entendre que d’autres personnes en lien avec le club, (dont au moins deux co-équipières) seraient impliquées dans l’affaire; qu’alors que le PSG faisait s’entraîner Aminata Diallo et Kheira Hamraoui chacune de son côté, et séparément de leur équipe, depuis des semaines, une erreur de calendrier les a amenées à se croiser et à échanger des noms d’oiseau; enfin, il a découvert que la police a relâché Aminata Diallo sans déposer de plainte, mais a refusé de l’innocenter et de lui rendre ses deux téléphones et son ordinateur portable.En attendant, les dommages collatéraux s’accumulent. Diallo et Hamraoui voient leurs noms salis et leur carrières bouleversées. La cohésion dans les vestiaires du PSG en souffre, compromettant les ambitions de victoire d’une des meilleures équipes d’Europe. Et le mariage d’une légende du football français impliqué dans l’affaire en a pris un coup : sa femme a annoncé dans un communiqué qu’elle demandait le divorce après qu’il lui a avoué avoir eu une liaison avec Kheira Hamraoui, selon son avocat.Kheira Hamraoui en août dernier. Elle et Diallo ont passée des vacances ensemble et étaient coéquipières au sein du club du Paris Saint-Germain et de l’équipe nationale.  Tim Nwachukwu/Getty ImagesLe New York Times a recueilli des informations sur l’agression et ses suite en interviewant une douzaine de personnes en contact direct avec les principaux protagonistes et ayant connaissance de l’agression et des évènements des jours qui l’ont suivie, dont des amis, des membres de leurs familles et des associés des joueuses, leurs avocats, des membres du PSG et de la police.Parmi les personnes interviewées, beaucoup tendent à réfuter les soupçons de jalousie et de trahison. La plupart n’ont accepté de parler qu’à condition que leur nom se soit pas cité, jugeant l’affaire trop sensible.Telle qu’elle se présente aujourd’hui, la situation est toujours aussi compliquée : Kheira Hamraoui a revu la police la semaine dernière, et il y a de fortes chances qu’Aminata Diallo soit elle aussi interrogée à nouveau. Les joueuses doivent reprendre l’entraînement avec leurs coéquipières mardi, mais l’affaire est désormais entre les mains d’un juge d’instruction pour une procédure qui pourrait durer au moins 18 mois. Pendant ce temps-là, les autorités et les joueuses continueront d’essayer d’élucider les dessous de cette petite minute qui, dans une rue peu éclairée, a fait basculer leurs vies.Un dîner d’équipeC’est au Chalet des Iles dans le Bois de Boulogne, aux abords de Paris, qu’Hamraoui, Diallo et leurs coéquipières du PSG ont dîné le soir de l’agression.James Hill pour The New York TimesPour les convives, ce dîner dans un restaurant chic situé sur une île dans un des plus grands parcs de Paris n’avait pourtant rien de particulier.C’était au début du mois de novembre, le club avait réuni les joueuses autour d’un bon repas pour entretenir cette cohésion qui leur avait permis de débuter la saison sans essuyer la moindre défaite, et pour les préparer aux prochaines épreuves.Aminata Diallo avait accepté de prendre Kheira Hamraoui et une autre joueuse, Sakina Karchaoui, dans sa voiture. Le restaurant ayant peu de places de parking, le club leur avait demandé de faire du co-voiturage. Les trois joueuses, qui habitent non loin les unes des autres dans une banlieue nord-ouest de Paris, s’étaient rapprochées depuis qu’elles avaient rejoint le PSG l’été précédent : Kheira Hamraoui venait de Barcelone, Sakina Karchaoui de Lyon, et Aminata Diallo avait été temporairement “prêtée” à l’Atletico de Madrid. Diallo et Hamraoui, déjà coéquipières à l’occasion d’un précédent passage au PSG et de stages avec l’équipe nationale étaient particulièrement proches. Elles avaient même passé des vacances ensemble.Après le dîner, vers 22h30, les trois jeunes femmes reprennent la voiture de Diallo, une Toyota Corolla fournie par le club. Hamraoui s’installe sur le siège passager, Diallo entre l’adresse de Karchaoui dans son GPS et elles prennent la route.Après avoir déposé Karchaoui dans une rue rendue étroite par le grand nombre de voitures garées tout au long, Diallo redémarre doucement lorsque deux hommes masqués surgissent de derrière une camionnette. Ils tapent sur le capot de la voiture pour la faire stopper et hurlent à l’attention de Diallo et d’Hamraoui :“Ouvre la porte!”Les agresseurs agissent très vite. Le premier ouvre la portière côté conducteur et plaque Aminata Diallo contre le volant. Le second arrache Kheira Hamraoui du siège passager.“Celui qui était de mon côté s’est saisi de moi et m’a extirpée du véhicule,” a déclaré Kheira Hamraoui à la police (d’après les extraits de ses déclarations publiés par la presse française). “Avant, il s’est emparé d’une barre de fer rectangulaire qu’il avait cachée dans son pantalon ou sous son pull. Il m’a donné un coup dès les premiers instants de l’agression pour m’obliger à sortir de l’habitacle.”Les blessures de Hamraoui étaient des coupures et d’importants hématomes au niveau des genous.Courtesy Harir AvocatsElle a déclaré à la police que l’agresseur visait essentiellement ses jambes.Kheira Hamraoui dit qu’elle est tombée sur la chaussée : “J’ai vu qu’il visait essentiellement mes jambes, et moi, j’essayais de me protéger avec mes mains.”Elle se souvient aussi avoir entendu un des inconnus crier quelque chose à propos d’un homme marié. Plus tard, Aminata Diallo dira à la police avoir entendu la phrase: “Alors comme ça, on couche avec des hommes mariés ?” Elle dira aussi avoir entendu des insultes à connotation sexuelle au travers des hurlements de Kheira Hamraoui , sur laquelle pleuvaient les coups.L’agression dure moins d’une minute avant que les agresseurs ne prennent la fuite. Hamraoui rentre et s’affalle dans la voiture, une main en sang. Les deux femmes appellent immédiatement Sakina Karchaoui, dont le domicile est à moins de 100 mètres, pour lui raconter ce qui s’est passé et lui demander de les rejoindre. Elles filent ensuite aux urgences les plus proches.Les suitesLes urgences de l’hôpital de Poissy, où Hamaraoui  s’est rendue pour faire soigner ses blessures quelques heures après l’agression.James Hill pour The New York TimesPendant le trajet, Diallo au volant, les joueuses préviennent le club de ce qui vient de se passer. Le directeur-adjoint de la sécurité du PSG, Frédéric Doué, arrive aux urgences avec Bernard Mendy, entraîneur adjoint de l’équipe féminine. Peu après, une amie de Kheira Hamraoui les rejoint aussi.Une fois les blessures de Hamraoui soignées, les agresseurs n’ayant pas été identifiés, les responsables du club interdisent aux joueuses de rentrer chez elles. L’équipe s’est arrangée pour qu’elles passent la nuit dans un Holiday Inn proche de leur terrain d’entraînement, à une quinzaine de kilomètres à l’ouest de Paris.Les trois jeunes femmes connaissent cet hôtel car elle ont y logé quelques semaines après leur transfert au PSG l’été précédent. Sakina Karchaoui et Kheira Hamraoui prennent une chambre à deux. Aminata Diallo s’installe dans une chambre voisine. L’amie de Kheira Hamraoui , elle aussi, passe la nuit à l’hôtel.Sur place, les jeunes femmes essaient de comprendre qui peut bien être à l’origine de l’agression. D’après plusieurs personnes au courant de leur conversation, Kheira Hamraoui est catégorique dès le départ : un membre du club est forcément impliqué. Les joueuses évoquent aussi un épisode étrange qui a eu lieu quelques semaines plus tôt : plusieurs de leurs coéquipières avaient reçu des appels anonymes d’un homme qui disait du mal de Hamraoui. Mais plus tard cette nuit-là, Kheira Hamraoui évoque aussi d’autres suspects, citant notamment le mari d’une quatrième joueuse du PSG, qui se trouve être aussi l’agent d’une autre star française de l’équipe.Le lendemain matin, après une nuit brève et agitée, les jeunes femmes reprennent leurs discussions. Pendant qu’elles parlent, le téléphone de Kheira Hamraoui sonne. C’est Éric Abidal, un ancien joueur de l’équipe nationale française qu’elle a connu au FC Barcelone, le club où elle a joué pednant trois saisons et dont il était alors le directeur technique.Eric Abidal, deux fois vainqueur de la Champions League à Barcelone et deux fois sélectionné dans l’équipe nationale pour la Coupe du Monde, demeure une populaire dans son pays natal. Albert Gea/ReutersKheira Hamraoui demande à Éric Abidal si sa femme pourrait vouloir lui faire du mal, puis lui annonce qu’elle s’est fait agresser. Le téléphone étant sur haut-parleur, tous ceux dans la pièce entendent sa reaction: il semble abasourdi. Ils échangent encore quelques mots, puis l’appel prend fin.Peu après, Sakira Karchaoui et Aminata Diallo partent petit-déjeuner au camp du club, à Bougival. Elles s’entraînent puis rencontrent des membres de la direction pour leur raconter les détails de l’agression. (Kheira Hamraoui ne les accompagnait pas ; elle était retournée faire soigner ses blessures). Plus tard, les joueuses, ainsi que les coéquipières qui avaient reçu les appels anonymes, sont allées faire de nouvelles déclarations à la police.Inquiet de voir qu’on s’en était pris à une de ses joueuses, le club désigne des agents de sécurité pour surveiller les domiciles des trois joueuses pendant quelques jours, mais ne divulgue pas la nouvelle de l’incident.Au sein de l’équipe, pourtant, la tension monte. L’attaquante de l’équipe nationale Kadidiatou Diani, qui en veut à Kheira Hamraoui d’avoir cité son mari parmi les éventuels suspects — il n’a pas été inquiété, ni même interrogé par la police — la prend à partie alors qu’elle s’entraîne sur un vélo en salle.Le 9 novembre, moins d’une semaine après l’agression, Aminata Diallo débutait le match de Ligue des Champions contre le Real Madrid à la place de Kheira Hamraoui. Sakira Karchaoui était aussi de la partie. Tout semblait normal, excepté l’absence de Kheira Hamraoui que le club justifia pour “raisons personnelles”. Encore une victoire pour le PSG. Et toujours aucun but encaissé depuis le début de la saison.Ce soir-là, comme souvent après les matchs, Aminata Diallo se couche tard. L’adrénaline la tient éveillée jusqu’à 3 heures du matin. Elle vient de fermer l’œil, selon ses proches, quand des coups frappés à sa porte d’entrée la tirent de son sommeil. Elle ouvre et se retrouve face à quatre officiers de police.36 heuresL’hôtel de police de Versailles, où Diallo est restée environ 36 heures en garde à vue.James Hill pour The New York TimesPoliment mais fermement, l’un d’eux demande à Aminata Diallo de les suivre au commissariat. Ses collègues fouillent le domicile et emportent plusieurs objets, dont au moins deux téléphones et un ordinateur portable. Arrivée au commissariat, Diallo refuse une offre d’être assistée par un avocat pendant son interrogatoire.Dès le début de l’interrogatoire, Aminata Diallo comprend que Kheira Hamraoui l’a désignée comme suspecte. Les policiers sous-entendaient qu’au retour du dîner, elle avait pris une autre route que celle qu’elle avait indiquée au départ. Ils lui demandaient pourquoi elle conduisait si lentement après avoir déposé Sakira Karchaoui. Ils lui ont ensuite soumis l’hypothèse suivante, publiée très vite dans un journal français alors que Diallo est encore en garde à vue : l’agression aurait été motivée par son désir d’être titularisée au poste de milieu de terrain, occupé par Hamraoui, dans l’équipe première.C’est cette hypothèse qui a catapulté l’histoire de l’agression dans les médias internationaux et suscité des comparaisons avec la tristement célèbre agression de la patineuse Nancy Kerrigan en 1994.La police procède à plusieurs interrogations d’Aminata Diallo, revenant à chaque reprise sur une même série de questions sur le trajet en voiture et sur ce qu’elle-même faisait pendant l’agression. Les policiers l’interroge aussi sur ses liens avec un homme emprisonné à Lyon pour des délits (notamment des extorsions) sans rapport avec l’agression. Connu sous le nom de Ja Ja, cet homme compte plusieurs footballeuses parmi ses connaissances, explique Diallo à la police, dont Kheira Hamraoui. La police a confirmé par la suite que lui aussi avait été interrogé au sujet de l’agression.Après l’avoir gardé pour elle, Aminata Diallo finit par révéler à ses interrogateurs qu’elle avait entendu un des agresseurs accuser Kheira Hamraoui de coucher avec un homme marié. (Au bout du cinquième interrogatoire de Diallo, la police a appris que la carte SIM du téléphone portable de Kheira Hamraoui est enregistrée au nom d’Eric Abidal; jusque là, cette dernière leur avait simplement dit que cette carte était liée à un ancien petit ami.)Aminata Diallo a raconté à des amis qu’à partir de ce moment-là, l’interrogatoire s’est adouci. Les officiers lui disent tout de même qu’elle devra passer la nuit au poste afin, dès le lendemain, qu’elle puisse prendre part à une “confrontation” avec Kheira Hamraoui – la confrontation, propre aux enquêtes françaises, consiste à réunir les suspects et les témoins pour que chacun expose sa version des faits.En guise de réconfort, la police autorise Aminata Diallo, qui est musulmane, à commander son dîner via une application de livraison. Elle choisit un sandwich au poulet halal.Un avenir incertainÀ Bougival, le centre où s’entraîne l’équipe féminine du PSG. Depuis peu, Hamraoui se rend aux entraînements accompagnée d’un garde du corps. James Hill pour The New York TimesLe lendemain, en fin d’après-midi, Aminata Diallo s’est donc retrouvée donc face à Kheira Hamraoui. Plus tard elle a dit à ses proches qu’elle avait trouvé “bizarre” de découvrir ce dont on l’accusait, à savoir que Kheira Hamraoui aurait entendu dire par des coéquipières que Diallo était derrière l’agression. Celle-ci a nié l’accusation. La confrontation a duré environ une heure. À la fin, Diallo a été autorisée à partir.Une amie d’Aminata Diallo est venue la chercher à la sortie de l’hôtel de police. Pendant le trajet, alors qu’on la reconduisait chez elle, Diallo a très vite réalisé l’ampleur qu’avait pris l’affaire — et sa notoriété bien malgré elle — à la lecture des centaines de SMS d’amis, de sa famille et d’autres.Le soir même, elle engageait un avocat, Mourad Battikh, pour la représenter. Le lendemain, le manager du PSG, Ulrich Ramé, lui a rendu visite chez elle accompagné d’un médecin. Ils l’ont encouragée à passer du temps avec ses proches pour se remettre. Elle insistait au contraire pour reprendre l’entraînement. Tout ce qu’elle désirait, c’était de retourner sur le terrain. Le club lui a fait comprendre que ce n’était pas possible, du moins dans un premier temps.Comme il y avait une pause dans le programme du PSG, Diallo en a profité pour aller à Grenoble voir sa famille, dont certains avaient appris l’agression et son arrestation dans les médias.Abou Dieng, un cousin, a confirmé au New York Times qu’elle espérait recommencer à jouer pour le PSG, l’équipe qu’elle a toujours rêvé de représenter : “On ne parle même pas de Kheira Hamraoui. On ne parle que de foot et de son retour aux entraînements.”De retour à Paris, Aminata Diallo a repris seule les entraînements. De même pour Kheira Hamraoui, le club s’appliquant à programmer leurs séances d’entraînement à des heures différentes et veillant à ce qu’elles ne se retrouvent jamais sur le terrain au même moment (sans toujours y parvenir). Leur purgatoire a commencé à prendre fin lundi, quand elles se sont entraînées ensemble pour la première fois depuis l’agression, après l’intervention du syndicat des joueurs français. Mardi, elles ont rejoint leurs coéquipières, mais un responsable du club leur a annoncé qu’elles ne les accompagneraient pas en Ukraine en milieu de semaine pour un match de Ligue des Champions.Ni l’une ni l’autre ne s’est exprimée publiquement sur l’agression, ni sur ses suites. Mais quelques jours après la libération d’Aminata Diallo, son avocat Mourad Battikh a qualifié à la télévision son arrestation d’ “infamante, scandaleuse et incohérente”. Quelques heures plus tard, c’est l’avocat de Kheira Hamraoui, Saïd Harir, qui réagissait à l’antenne en montrant des photos des blessures infligées à sa cliente.Le PSG, qui a refusé de répondre à nos questions, reste discret sur les rebondissements d’une affaire qui semble désormais également signer la fin du mariage d’Éric Abidal. L’avocat de son épouse Hayet a annoncé que sa cliente demande le divorce. Le 18 novembre, il a publié un communiqué dans lequel Hayet Abidal affirme que son mari reconnaît avoir eu une liaison avec Kheira Hamraoui. Plus tard sur Instagram, Eric Abidal a demandé à sa femme de lui pardonner.Hayet Abidal a nié toute implication dans l’agression. Mais Maryvonne Caillebotte, la procureure chargée du dossier, a déclaré le 15 novembre au journal Le Monde qu’Éric Abidal “sera entendu prochainement”. Une audition de son épouse n’est pas non plus exclue.Mourad Battikh, l’avocat de Diallo, ne décolère pas sur la façon dont sa cliente a été traitée par la police. “Quand c’est Aminata, ils montrent leurs muscles et ils la mettent en garde à vue”, s’indigne-t-il. “Quand c’est Éric Abidal, une personnalité forte, célèbre, populaire, ils prennent leur temps et procèdent lentement pour être sûrs de ne pas faire d’erreurs.”Mourad Battikh, l’avocat d’Aminata Diallo, dans son bureau à Paris.James Hill pour The New York TimesL’avocat Saïd Harir, engagé pour représenter Kheira Hamraoui.James Hill pour The New York TimesL’équipe féminine du PSG traverse une crise. Son premier match après le scandale a été une raclée (6-1) par son principal rival, Lyon, qui compromet sans doute ses espoirs de conserver le titre de champion de France. Certaines coéquipières de Kheira Hamraoui ont demandé qu’on éloigne leur casier du sien dans les vestiaires. D’autres ont avoué à la direction du club qu’elles auront du mal à reprendre le jeu avec elle. Plusieurs des meilleures joueuses du club veulent simplement passer à autre chose.Pendant ce temps-là, les agresseurs sont toujours en cavale et personne ne sait où cette affaire mènera. Une attaque préméditée comme celle qu’a subie Kheira Hamraoui est passible de cinq ans de prison, selon une porte-parole de la police de Versailles.Aminata Diallo souhaite que justice soit rendue, affirme son avocat. Elle est convaincue de son innocence et déterminée à poursuivre sa carrière au PSG — son contrat prend fin dans six mois. “Sa réputation a été ternie par les journaux du monde entier,” déplore Me Battikh.Kheira Hamraoui aussi veut que justice soit faite, mais elle continue de croire que c’est au sein du club que la vérité verra le jour. Elle l’a dit lors de son dernier entretien avec la police, le 29 novembre. D’après un témoin de sa comparution, les enquêteurs l’ont réinterrogée sur le comportement d’Aminata Diallo dans la voiture et sur la route qu’elle a empruntée.Dans son bureau aux environs des Champs-Élysées, son avocat, Me Harir, affirme qu’il s’agit avant tout de découvrir qui sont les auteurs de l’agression. “On espère que les coupables seront inculpés rapidement,” confirme-t-il.Il ajoute, à propos de Kheira Hamraoui : “Ce qu’elle veut aujourd’hui, c’est que l’on respecte sa vie privée, que l’on respecte son statut de victime.”Romain Molina et Daphné Anglès ont contribué à ce reportage. More

  • 75 Shares179 Views

    in Soccer

    Juventus, Chasing Style, Forgets the Substance

    Juventus has thought for too long about the now, and too little about what comes next.Perhaps the best measure of how concerned Juventus is by image — of how central to the club’s identity is the way that identity is projected and perceived — is that it may well be the only team in world soccer to have its own, custom-designed font.It was commissioned in 2017, presumably after a raft of meetings that featured intense, sincere discussions about what typeface best conveyed the team’s values and mission. The font appears in all of the club’s marketing campaigns. It is deployed on all its social media pronouncements. It adorns the Juventus offices in Turin and Milan.Using the font is important to Juventus executives: uniformity of iconography, they believe, is crucial in helping build the club’s brand, in expressing to current fans and prospective ones and, where none can be found, putative customers, quite what Juventus stands for. Everything the club publishes has to have that distinctive, recognizable Juventus look. Image comes first.All of which makes the events of the last few months — perhaps longer — difficult to understand. First, there is the ongoing and now faintly masochistic devotion of Andrea Agnelli, the club’s president, to a Super League project that has not only cost him friendships and positions of power, but that has been met with pretty much universal opprobrium from fans. Continued commitment to it is not, as they say, a good look.And then, more serious still, there is the investigation by Italy’s financial authorities into six current and former executives — including Agnelli and Pavel Nedved, the club’s vice president — into Juventus’s transfer dealings. The authorities are said to be considering various charges of false accounting and reporting. The police have already raided the club’s training facility and its offices. That is not great for the image, either.It would be easy, then, to see more than a little hubris in Juventus’s on-field travails this season. There is a scene in the first episode of the club’s edition of the “All Or Nothing” documentary series — which started airing on Amazon Prime late last month, and over which the team’s executives hung like hawks, every step of the way — in which Agnelli gathers the members of the playing squad and lets them know, in no uncertain terms, the expectations.With an expletive or two thrown in, he tells the players that the previous season was not up to scratch. The year in question was the one before last, the one in which Maurizio Sarri led Juventus to a ninth straight Serie A title. The coach, an unlikely appointment who turned into an unpopular incumbent, had gone; Agnelli would not, he said, tolerate a repeat.The Juventus president Andrea Agnelli, right, and vice president Pavel Nedved are said be to be under investigation for the club’s transfer dealings.Massimo Rana/EPA, via ShutterstockIn comparison, of course, that year under Sarri would come to be seen as the last chapter of the golden era. Under his replacement, the novice Andrea Pirlo, Juventus barely scraped into the Champions League — relying on Napoli’s stumbling at home on the final day to make it — and then, over the course of the summer, discovered that Cristiano Ronaldo, the player it had brought in to turn domestic hegemony into continental success, no longer wanted to stick around.If that seemed like the nadir, it was not. After the failed experiments with Sarri and Pirlo, Juventus restored Massimiliano Allegri as coach this summer. His task was to prioritize “results,” as he has put it, over the pursuit of style that had captivated the club when it decided, a couple of years ago, that it had outgrown Sarri. Juventus had realized, it seemed, that the fact of winning was more central to its identity than the nature of it.Things are not, though, quite so simple. Allegri’s team has lost five games in Serie A already this season. Relative minnows, like Sassuolo, and actual minnows, like Empoli, have returned from Juventus’s Allianz Stadium with victories. Last weekend, Atalanta won in Turin for the first time in more than 30 years.Juventus sits seventh in Serie A, 12 points behind Napoli, the early leader. Allegri has already stated his belief that finishing fourth, and securing yet another season in the Champions League, may be the limit of this team’s ambitions. Even that relatively meager target is by no means guaranteed.Juventus fans are not used to watching a seventh-place team.Massimo Pinca/ReutersThe cause of that decline can be traced to the same root as the demise in Juventus’s image. There is a tendency, in soccer, to believe nobody is capable of doing two things at once: A player taking an interest in off-field activities — whether that is being on TikTok, running a fashion label, feeding hungry children — will, at some point, invariably be told to concentrate on their performances; a club that takes care of its brand identity will be told to focus, instead, on signing players.It is a false dichotomy, of course. Players can run a business, campaign or social media account and still remember how to mark opponents on corners. Clubs employ hundreds of people, not all of whom are devoted to tactics, nutrition or being a right back.Where the two threads of Juventus’s struggles entwine is in the rationale behind them. Agnelli favors a Super League because it solves his club’s immediate financial problems. The plusvalenza system that the team’s executives are accused of manipulating offers the same, short-term hit: It makes sure this year’s books look good, with little or no thought to what happens later.Manager Massimiliano Allegri is already setting limits on what his team can achieve this season.Ciro De Luca/ReutersThat is precisely how Juventus has been run, too. In 2017, after a second defeat in the Champions League final in three years, Agnelli became obsessed with winning instantly. The painstaking, intelligent work that had returned the club to the pinnacle in both Italy and Europe was out; signing players to triumph immediately became the order of the day. A year later, the approach reached its apogee when Ronaldo arrived in Turin.Now Juventus is paying for that impatience. Ronaldo may be gone, but there are countless others — all on hefty contracts, all eating up the club’s pandemic-ravaged finances, all too costly to be easily offloaded — who remain: Aaron Ramsey and Alex Sandro and Adrien Rabiot.Allegri has at his disposal the sketch outline of a young, competitive team: Matthijs de Ligt, Rodrigo Bentancur, Manuel Locatelli, Dejan Kulusevski and Federico Chiesa. The club’s decision to establish an under-23 team in Italy’s third tier was made with the future in mind, too.But none of it can come to fruition while the squad, and the balance sheet, is filled by the underperforming and the overpaid. Juventus has thought for too long about the now, and too little about what comes next. And it is that, ultimately, which will do the damage to its image, to how it is perceived, and how it perceives itself. What matters, after all, is the story a club tells, not how it is written.Not Such a Walk in the ParcLionel Messi’s brilliance has not translated directly into French quite yet.Thibault Camus/Associated PressThere have been years when it has felt at least a little like either Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo won the Ballon d’Or by default, that they were awarded the most prestigious individual prize in soccer not so much for what they had achieved recently but because it seemed inconceivable to suggest one of the two of them was not the finest player in the world.This year was not one of them. Of course, Robert Lewandowski offered a compelling alternative case. Even discounting the emotional appeal of honoring a player who so richly deserved the award 12 months ago, Lewandowski, the Bayern Munich striker, had done enough — more than enough — to win it based on his 2021 alone. It is not every season, after all, that a player breaks a 50-year-old goal-scoring record.But it hardly requires some great suspension of disbelief to understand why, eventually, France Football’s jurors chose Messi: It was this year, after all, that he finally ended his — and his country’s — long wait for an international trophy. The Copa América was Argentina’s first senior triumph since 1993. Delivering international glory was the one hole on Messi’s résumé. Now he has filled it. That was, as it should have been, enough.The complication is that Messi won his seventh Ballon d’Or as his domestic form is — how to put this delicately? — stuttering. His final season at Barcelona brought 38 goals in 47 games, even in a bitterly disappointing campaign, but he has struggled to find that form at Paris St.-Germain.He has three goals in the Champions League — including a wonderful strike against Manchester City — but only one in Ligue 1. A delayed start to the season, a couple of interruptions from minor injuries and being part of a somewhat inchoate team have not helped, but he has certainly not found France’s top flight as easy as anticipated.That will change, obviously, as P.S.G. hits its stride and as Messi adapts to a league he has acknowledged is more physical to the one to which he was accustomed. He recorded three assists against Saint-Etienne last weekend.But for now it serves as a reminder, perhaps, that Ligue 1 — widely derided as the weakest of Europe’s major domestic tournaments — is not quite the cakewalk many believe it to be, that any player at all can find a new environment challenging, and that nothing is easy, not really, even for the greats.Twenty’s PlentyIt is hard to tell which is the more startling statistic: that England scored 20 goals — 20, two zero — in a single game on Tuesday, or that in the process, Sarina Wiegman’s team racked up 64 shots. That works out, math fans, to roughly one every 90 seconds.The victory, in a World Cup qualifier against Latvia, ranks as the biggest-ever win by an England team. It also represented a European record for a competitive women’s game, though there should be just a small asterisk there: the previous mark was set only a few days earlier, when Belgium beat Armenia, 19-0.The issue of what to do with overmatched teams is not exclusive to the women’s game, of course — the debate flares up pretty reliably in men’s qualifying, too — but, because of the rapid development of the game across Europe, the scale of the imbalance and the urgency with which it must be addressed feel much greater.Ellen White and Beth Mead each scored three goals against Latvia this week. Their teammate Lauren Hemp had four.Tim Goode/Press Association, via Associated PressIt is, certainly, no time to indulge the two nonsensical orthodoxies that infect this debate in the men’s game: that playing the very best helps the smaller nations to improve — even Wiegman quite rightly dispatched that idea — and that changing the format of qualifying, in some way, prevents everyone from having an even chance to reach a tournament.A two- or even three-tier qualifying system for major competitions exists in North America, Africa and Asia. It does not exist in South America, but only because the likes of Suriname and French Guiana compete (for reasons that are not strictly geographical) in Concacaf. There is absolutely no reason Europe could not do the same.As Wiegman said, Latvia learned nothing from losing, 20-0, to England, in a game in which it had 14 percent possession and no shots on goal. England, likewise, learned nothing. Streamlining qualification is not a mark of disrespect to developing nations. It is not depriving them of a chance to get better. If anything, the exact opposite is true.CorrespondenceTo be honest, I could just copy and paste Nitin Bajaj’s email and leave it there for correspondence this week: “I read the bit on managers’ captivation with condiments with a great deal of … er … relish,” he wrote, clearly very pleased with himself.Gary Brown, meanwhile, thinks there is some sort of ketchup-based conspiracy at play. “What’s the evidence that Dean Smith had ever allowed ketchup at Villa before his sacking?” he asked. “Steven Gerrard announced that he’d banned it before he’d even seen it on the table at his new club. On the other hand, a suspicious mind might follow Dean Smith to his quick appointment at Norwich, whose majority owner is Delia Smith, cookery writer and TV legend, who is on record as saying she and her husband have ‘Big Mac picnics in the car-park’ at evening games, with fries and loads of ketchup’.”A clutch of you, meanwhile — James Patch, Martin Maudal and Jim Yoder — all got in touch to suggest the perfect example of how much difference a manager can make: Thomas Tuchel at Chelsea. This is absolutely correct, of course, but once again: I cannot produce a newsletter that just runs to four words.Thomas Tuchel, the exception that proves the rule.Frank Augstein/Associated PressAnd Thabo Caves sends an email that leads me to another thought. “A team has 11 players on the pitch most of the time,” he wrote. “If one player has roughly the same impact as another, then each player would have roughly a 9 percent influence on their team’s performance. Bringing in a new manager could then be considered as almost as influential as signing a new player in the middle of the season. Single players are consistently lauded for having transformative effects on teams, so why can’t a manager?”Why not indeed, Thabo, which leaves me to wonder: Should we not limit when teams can change their managers — perhaps to two windows, one before and one during the season — as we do with players? Why the reason for the difference? More

  • 125 Shares149 Views

    in Soccer

    I.O.C. Says It Held Second Video Call With Peng Shuai

    Olympic officials said they ‘shared the same concern as many’ about the safety of the Chinese tennis star but offered no details of what they discussed with her.The International Olympic Committee said Thursday that it had held a second call with the Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai, trying anew to deflect criticism of its light-touch approach to China only months before the 2022 Winter Games in Beijing.“We share the same concern as many other people and organizations about the well-being and safety of Peng Shuai,” the I.O.C. statement said. “This is why, just yesterday, an IOC team held another video call with her. We have offered her wide-ranging support, will stay in regular touch with her, and have already agreed on a personal meeting in January.”IOC Statement on the situation of Peng Shuaihttps://t.co/7wDhc0w33f— IOC MEDIA (@iocmedia) December 2, 2021
    As with an earlier call with Peng on Nov. 21, the I.O.C. did not release video or a transcript of the call, nor did it say how Wednesday’s call was arranged or who took part. The previous call included the I.O.C.’s president, Thomas Bach but also an I.O.C. member from China.Peng, 35, disappeared from public view more than a month ago after she accused Zhang Gaoli, a former vice premier of China, of sexual assault. Her disappearance, China’s efforts to censor any mention of her allegations and its sometimes clumsy efforts to suggest she had retracted her claims, have only intensified concerns about her safety with tennis officials, fellow athletes and human rights groups.The I.O.C. statement, like its earlier statements on Peng, made no mention of her sexual assault claims, referring only to “the difficult situation she is in.”The latest call, which the I.O.C. said took place on Wednesday, came on the same day the women’s professional tennis tour announced it would suspend all of its events in China, including Hong Kong, until the Chinese government took several measures. It called for the government to stop censoring Peng, allow her to speak and travel freely and “investigate the allegation of sexual assault in a full, fair and transparent manner.”Olympic officials have been on the defensive for weeks for their relative silence on Peng’s disappearance, which critics of both the organization and of China have derided as an attempt to avoid even the appearance of criticizing a powerful partner. The looming Winter Olympics in China, which will make Beijing the first city to host the Summer and Winter Games, open on Feb. 4.The I.O.C. has countered that its effort to aid Peng has been a campaign of “quiet diplomacy,” a phrase it repeated in Thursday’s statement.“There are different ways to achieve her well-being and safety,” the I.O.C. said. “We have taken a very human and person-centered approach to her situation. Since she is a three-time Olympian, the I.O.C. is addressing these concerns directly with Chinese sports organizations. We are using ‘quiet diplomacy’ which, given the circumstances and based on the experience of governments and other organizations, is indicated to be the most promising way to proceed effectively in such humanitarian matters.” More

  • 138 Shares179 Views

    in Soccer

    Italy and Portugal Drawn in Same Group for World Cup Playoff

    The draw for Europe’s final three qualifying places ensured that either Italy, the European champion, or Portugal, with Cristiano Ronaldo, would miss the finals in Qatar.Italy and Portugal were drawn into the same World Cup qualifying bracket on Friday, ensuring that either the reigning European champion (Italy) or one of soccer’s biggest stars (Portugal’s Cristiano Ronaldo) will be absent from next year’s tournament in Qatar.Italy will face North Macedonia at home in a semifinal in March, and the winner will travel to play the winner of the bracket’s other semifinal — either Portugal or Turkey — for one of the last three European places in the World Cup. The Portugal-Turkey winner would host that game five days later.🥁 The semi-finals are set for the European play-offs!🎫 One team from each of the 3 paths will reach the #WorldCup 🏆 pic.twitter.com/cvkFwdzQoX— FIFA World Cup (@FIFAWorldCup) November 26, 2021
    The potential for such a high-stakes showdown also raised the possibility that Italy would miss the World Cup for the second cycle in a row. Italy lost a playoff for a place in the last World Cup, in Russia in 2018 — a defeat that one newspaper declared a “national shame.”“It could have been a little better, for sure,” Italy Coach Roberto Mancini told the Italian broadcaster RAI2 after Friday’s playoff draw. “As we would have gladly avoided them,” he added, “probably they too would have avoided us.”The possible showdown was the most intriguing of several high-stakes matchups for Europe’s last three spots in Qatar, and the first test of a new qualifying format. In the past, the European playoffs have taken the form of two-legged, head-to-head matchups.Instead, this year, the 12 teams — 10 of which finished as runners-up in their qualifying groups — were split into three four-team paths, each with its own semifinals and final. Only the winning team from each path qualifies for the World Cup.In the other brackets, Scotland will face Ukraine, with the winner meeting Wales or Austria, and Russia will host Poland for the right to face Sweden or the Czech Republic.Wales, which made its only World Cup appearance in 1958, was drawn into the same bracket as Scotland, which has not qualified since 1998.Ten European teams — led by Germany, France, Belgium and England — have already qualified, as have the two South American favorites, Brazil and Argentina.Friday’s draw also set up second-chance routes to the World Cup for countries from four other regional confederations. In those games, the fourth-place team from Concacaf, the region comprising North and Central America and the Caribbean, would play the Oceania champion, and the fifth-place team from South America would play the fifth-place team from Asia.Those games will be played as single-leg matches in Qatar next June 13 and 14 — more than two months after the World Cup draw sorts the 32-team field on April 1. More

  • 88 Shares179 Views

    in Soccer

    Lionel Messi Wins Record Seventh Ballon d’Or

    The Paris St.-Germain star capped a year in which he led Argentina to the Copa América title by edging Bayern Munich’s Robert Lewandowski.Some of the most illustrious names in soccer’s long history only managed to win the Ballon d’Or, the sport’s most prestigious individual prize, once. George Best, Zinedine Zidane and Eúsebio all have just a single award to their names. Ronaldo, the great Brazilian striker, won two. Johan Cruyff, arguably the finest European player in history, has three.After Monday night, Lionel Messi has seven.Messi, 34, effectively retained the trophy he last won in 2019 — controversially, the award was not handed out by France Football last year because of the coronavirus pandemic — after a year in which he ended his long wait for an international honor, winning the Copa América with Argentina, and left Barcelona, the club where he had spent all of his career, for Paris St.-Germain.When your dad wins an other Ballon d’Or 🙌#ballondor pic.twitter.com/UWKir71mX5— Ballon d’Or #ballondor (@francefootball) November 29, 2021
    “It’s incredible to be here again,” Messi said. “Two years ago I thought it was the last time. Winning the Copa América was the key.”“I don’t know how many years I have left,” he added, “but I hope many more.”Messi finished with 613 points in the voting, only 33 more than the runner-up, Bayern Munich striker Robert Lewandowski. In 2019, the last time the trophy was awarded, Messi beat Liverpool defender Virgil van Dijk by only seven points.Barcelona may have lost Messi this year, but it still took home some hardware on Monday: Alexia Putellas, a star midfielder on its treble-winning women’s team, became the third winner of the women’s Ballon d’Or, and the teenager Pedri, a rising talent who is already a fixture for Barcelona and Spain’s national team, was honored as the world’s best player under 21.Messi, who had arrived at the gala at Théâtre du Châtelet in Paris in a shimmering tuxedo, a look matched by his three young sons, was typically soft-spoken in accepting his award. He praised his former teammates at Barcelona and his countrymen with Argentina, and vowed to fight for new trophies with his new club, P.S.G.Messi defeated Lewandowski in voting by 176 journalists and conducted by France Football, which awards the Ballon d’Or (almost) every year. Many experts argued Lewandowski deserved the honor in 2020, when it was not handed out because, organizers said, disruptions to the soccer calendar had made it impossible to judge. Messi said he agreed with that position.“I think you deserved to win the award last year,” Messi told Lewandowski from the stage, calling it “an honor” to stand against him for top honors in 2021.Jorginho, the Brazil-born Italy midfielder, was third in the balloting, reward for a season in which his club team, Chelsea, won the Champions League and Italy won the European Championship. Real Madrid and France striker Karim Benzema was fourth, and Jorginho’s Chelsea midfield partner, N’Golo Kanté, was fifth.Ronaldo, who finished sixth in the voting, was absent from Monday’s ceremony, but his rivalry with Messi was not. On his Instagram account, Ronaldo angrily took issue with a comment made recently by France Football’s editor in chief, Pascal Ferré, in an interview with The New York Times about the award’s prestige.“Ronaldo has only one ambition, and that is to retire with more Ballons d’Or than Messi,” Ferré said, “and I know that because he has told me.”Ronaldo — despite suggesting as much in other interviews — denied he had made the comment, saying, “Ferré lied, used my name to promote himself and to promote the publication he works for.”“It is unacceptable,” he added, “that the person responsible for awarding such a prestigious prize could lie in this way, in absolute disrespect for someone who has always respected France Football and the Ballon d’Or.”Though 2021 has hardly been a vintage year by Messi’s standards — Barcelona was beaten to the Spanish title by Atlético Madrid and eliminated from last season’s Champions League in the round of 16 — his achievement with Argentina, as well as the attention drawn by his move to France after winning six Ballons d’Or at Barcelona, was enough to convince the award’s jurors.That Messi had never won an international trophy with his national team had always been held against him in the debate over whether he warrants the status as soccer’s greatest ever player. His rivals, after all, had triumphed with their countries as well as their clubs: Pelé led Brazil to three World Cups, Diego Maradona inspired Argentina to one and Cristiano Ronaldo helped Portugal claim the European Championship in 2016.Messi finally put that idea to rest in this summer’s Copa América, breaking down in tears on the field after Ángel Di María’s goal had given Argentina its first international trophy since 1993, beating Brazil, the host, in the final.His tally of seven Ballons d’Or now puts him two clear of Ronaldo, his great rival: The Portuguese forward remains on five, but he has not won the prize since 2017, and at age 36 he is more than two years older than Messi.Putellas, the 27-year-old midfielder who is captain of Barcelona’s all-conquering women’s team, won the women’s Ballon d’Or. Her victory completed a clean sweep of last season’s prizes, after she led her Barcelona side to the Champions League title and a league and cup double in Spain, and then was honored as Europe’s player of the year.Her main rivals for the Ballon d’Or were mostly familiar faces: Barcelona had become the first women’s team to register five nominees in a single year, and two of Putellas’s teammates — Jennifer Hermoso, who was second, and Lieke Martens, who was fifth — finished in the top five in the voting.“Honestly it’s a bit emotional, and very special,” Putellas said. “It’s great to be here with all of my teammates, since we have lived and experienced so much together, especially in the past year.”“This is an individual prize,” she added, “but football is a team sport.” More

  • 100 Shares149 Views

    in Soccer

    How Much Does a Top Club's Manager Matter?

    One set of researchers estimated a manager is responsible for only eight percent of a team’s results. But eight percent, when you think about it, is a lot.That first day, for an incoming manager at a new club, must be overwhelming. There is an entire squad of players to meet, to get to know, to win over. There is a staff, nervous of your intentions and fearful of what the future may hold, to convince and, hopefully, to command.There are training schedules to draw up and tactics to implement and a great pile of footage to watch, to try and work out where it went wrong — because it has, more often than not, gone wrong, and that is why you have a job — and how it might be put right. There are political currents to detect, alliances to forge, enmities to soothe. And there is no time, because there is a game looming on the horizon, a first impression to make.And yet, before all of that, there is one thing that seems to consume all new managers, young and old, fresh and wizened, hopeful and worldly-wise, one question that must be addressed before anything else can happen, one decision that will set the tone for your reign: Where do you stand, exactly, vis-à-vis ketchup?Managers seem to spend more time than might be expected establishing their precise policy on condiments. Within a few days of arriving at Aston Villa, Steven Gerrard had banned them. So, too, had Antonio Conte, when he joined Tottenham.Of course, as much as anything else, this is a power play. It is a way of establishing dominance over every aspect of the players’ lives, casting yourself as an authority figure, making plain that fitness is your absolute priority. (Most managers, when they take a new job, are struck by how terribly out-of-shape the squad of lean, musclebound elite athletes suddenly at their disposal seems to be.)Steven Gerrard banned condiments at Aston Villa. Enthusiasm is still approved.John Sibley/Action Images Via ReutersThere is an alternative route, though: The absence of condiments can be diagnosed as a problem just as much as their presence. In cases where a manager is replacing an anti-ketchup extremist, some will consider reinstating them as an olive branch — well, a tapenade — to the squad, a way of signaling that the brutal, flavorless days of the previous regime are over, and that a more collaborative, trusting approach is at hand.The significance of all of this is, of course, overplayed. Journalists focus on minor details like whether a manager has banned ketchup because — to offer the kindest interpretation — it serves as an illustrative, immediately comprehensible shorthand for what sort of coach they intend to be, in a way that detailing exactly what sort of running drills they are doing does not.The news media’s apparently insatiable obsession with condiments does, though, hint at a greater truth, one that generally goes unspoken, one that flirts with breaking the fourth wall: that managers, as a rule, do not matter as much as we think they do. For the most part, they are tinkering around the edges, their decisions and their choices and their approaches largely irrelevant to how their tenures will play out, their power limited not to their own destiny but to what players can have with their main courses.Ole Gunnar Solskjaer was given plenty of time to find a path forward at Manchester United. But last week, it ran out.Carl Recine/Action Images Via ReutersThat, certainly, is what almost every academic study on the influence of soccer managers has concluded. Some have entered popular discourse: the research in “Soccernomics” that estimated that a manager is responsible for only 8 percent of a team’s results; the work in “The Numbers Game” that placed the figure at around double that.Some have remained adrift in academia — one, in 2013, found that interim managers tended to have more direct impact on results than permanent ones — but reached the same broad conclusion.Only the true greats, people like Alex Ferguson and Arsène Wenger, had a tangible, discernible impact. Everyone else was at the mercy of factors not entirely within their control: a club’s financial potency, the quality of player on the books, the strength of their opponents. It is only necessary to glance at Paris St.-Germain to know that, even with a high-caliber manager and a high-quality squad, sometimes the mix is not right; something has to spark, something between chemistry and alchemy, to make things work.That conclusion, though, is not quite as straightforward as it appears. Eight percent, to use the lowest available estimate, may not sound like a lot, but in the context of elite soccer, in particular, it is a huge and unwieldy variable.This is a sport, after all, of fine margins: a brief loss of concentration, a slight tactical distinction, a single decision made instinctively by a brilliant player can all decide a game. That the identity of a single staff member can be directly responsible for almost a tenth of the outcome is proof not of a manager’s irrelevance, but of the opposite.Manchester United has problems, but star power, talent and budget are not among them.Peter Powell/EPA, via ShutterstockManchester United — yes, them again — is a case in point. United has one of the most expensive, richly remunerated squads in soccer history. This is supposed to be the great corollary with performance: How much you pay your players is, in theory, the best gauge for where they will help you finish in the league.But, at the point that Ole Gunnar Solskjaer was fired, United was marooned in seventh place in the Premier League. It had been humiliated, in quick succession, by Liverpool and Manchester City and Watford. There was little or no cohesion in defense, no identifiable plan in attack, no real sense that anyone knew what they were supposed to be doing at all.Not all of that is the manager’s fault, of course: United’s haphazard recruitment policy and its outdated, flawed structure were the primary culprits. But that the problems should have been so visible, so pronounced under Solskjaer, a coach so obviously out of his depth, serve as a potent reminder that, no matter how good your players, they are not enough on their own.They need to be organized effectively, too: not only to compete with City and Liverpool, two of the four best teams on the planet, but to survive against a straggler like Watford. In a sport of fine margins, after all, it does not take much to shift the balance, and to shift it drastically. A merely good manager may look like they do not have much of an impact. When one does not meet even that bar, the effect, as we have seen, is obvious, whatever they do with the ketchup.When the Reward Comes After the SeasonErling Haaland and Dortmund are out of the Champions League. He may be back in it before his old club is.Ina Fassbender/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesThere are, at least, mitigating circumstances. Borussia Dortmund went into its game against Sporting Lisbon in the Champions League on Wednesday without a raft of first-choice players: no Mats Hummels, no Giovanni Reyna, no Raphael Guerreiro and, of course, no Erling Haaland. Marco Rose, the coach, had resources so diminished that he could not even fill his quota of substitutes.Still, that Dortmund’s involvement in the Champions League should be over not only before spring, but before December, should be regarded as something of a failure. Not least because — in Ajax, Sporting and Besiktas, the Turkish champion — Dortmund could hardly bemoan the cruel vicissitudes of a tough group-stage draw.That even that pool proved too much, though, hints that balance has been lost at Dortmund. For more than a decade, the club has been held up as a paradigm of how to thrive in soccer’s new world: Dortmund’s success has been built, essentially, on turning itself into a springboard for the world’s brightest young talents, a way-station on the road to greatness.That praise was not misplaced. Though there has been no Bundesliga title at Dortmund since 2012, the club has remained competitive — by and large — while regularly selling off or being divested of soccer’s next generation: Robert Lewandowski and Christian Pulisic and, most recently, Jadon Sancho.There is a sense, though, of ever-diminishing returns. While the stars keep forming — Haaland will go next summer, and probably Jude Bellingham the year after that — the results are dwindling.The suspicion is that Dortmund’s priorities have changed: that selling players is no longer a byproduct of composing a young team capable of competing, but that competing is now a happy, occasional consequence of composing a young team that can be sold. Not reaching the knockout rounds of the Champions League is a failure, of course. But that is not the trophy Dortmund was hoping to win this year. Its aim, instead, is to make sure that Haaland can be sold at a vast profit in the summer. That remains on course. Whether that is the right course, though, is a different matter.The Super League Will Come AgainIt is, in a way, the punishment they deserve. Six months ago, the architects of the European Super League had grand, hubristic visions of breaking free from the unwanted control of faceless, supranational bureaucracies. Now, their revolutionary idea only exists — so much as it exists at all — in the legalistic quagmire of the European Parliament.We will not dally on the details of this, because they are, by their very nature, intensely boring: This week, the European Union’s assembly passed a resolution opposing “breakaway leagues,” and pledging to uphold what it described as the “European model for sport.” The motion was nonbinding, so has no material consequence, but it represented yet another setback for the cabal of clubs who refuse to let the subject rest.Before the various uneasy allies who came together to suppress the revolt celebrate too loudly, though, it is worth considering the situation — as things stand — in the Champions League. All four English teams have made it safely through despite, in three cases, barely breaking a sweat, and in one, that of Manchester United, not being very good.Manchester City and its Premier League rivals are waltzing through the Champions League again.Oli Scarff/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesThat contrasts starkly with the reality of life at their traditional, continental counterweights. Juventus has made it through, but was humiliated by Chelsea. Both Atlético Madrid and Barcelona may miss the knockouts. Germany and Spain may have only one representative each in the last 16.The dynamics here are clear: England has emerged unscathed from the pandemic — as witnessed by the multibillion-dollar broadcast deal the Premier League signed with NBC last week — while most of Europe’s major leagues have not. A handful of teams, like Bayern Munich and Paris St.-Germain, might not have lost ground, but nor have they gained it. For most, though, the gap that was already opening between England and everyone else has suddenly become a chasm.There have already been two all-English Champions League finals in the last three years. The economic currents swirling around the game make it very likely there will be more, many more, in the near future.That is not, to be clear, healthy for soccer as a whole. It is obviously not healthy for Europe’s major powers. More and more may come to recognize that in seasons to come. The idea of a Super League — one excluding the English teams — may not remain tangled in the European Parliament for long.CorrespondenceLluis Gene/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesAn excellent alternative viewpoint on last week’s newsletter from William Ireland, who from memory may, in fact, be a Bill.“The inability of Barcelona and Real Madrid to treat the Premier League as a feeder league is a problem for the Premier League, too,” he wrote. “The reality is that moving players before they grow stale and distracted has been great for the English teams. You wonder how much better their teams could be if some of their older players had been plucked away by the Liga duopoly. That problem is likely to get worse as teams keep acquiring more players and do not have any easy way to lose any from their current roster.”This is, I would agree, an issue that Premier League clubs are going to have to think about more and more. There is no longer a viable outlet for the players they would like to move on, either to cash in when their value is highest or their decline imminent, or because a newer, shinier trinket has captured their attention. Part of me wonders if it is a natural part of the cycle: the same phenomenon that has undermined Barcelona, say, but writ large across a league.George Gorecki, meanwhile, contests the idea that Africa should have more than five spots at a World Cup. “The African countries are among the least impressive, when it comes to their performances at the finals,” he wrote.“In every World Cup from 1990 to 2010, only one African team reached the knockout stage. In 2014, there were two, while in 2018, there were none. An African team has reached the quarterfinals only three times.” If anything, he suggested, this means “Africa should probably relinquish some of their places.”I would quibble with that. For one: Africa might send more teams to the knockout rounds if it had more teams in the tournament. Two out of five reaching the last 16 in 2014 is pretty good going, isn’t it?Second: African qualifying is substantially more arbitrary than it really ought to be. The final round of home-and-away playoffs, in particular, means there tends to be at least one, if not two, of the continent’s best sides left behind. I would agree, though, that Africa’s performances have not improved as it looked as if they might in the 1990s. But at least part of the responsibility for that, to me, is structural. More

  • 125 Shares99 Views

    in Soccer

    He Knows the Ballon d'Or Winner. No, He Won't Tell.

    Encrypted email servers, secret meetings, strict confidentiality: How the identity of the winner of the Ballon d’Or, soccer’s biggest individual prize, is guarded like a state secret.At this time of year, Pascal Ferré seems to field the same call, over and over again. They come from across the world. Sometimes, it is a team executive or a club president. Often, it is an agent, charming and inquisitive. Occasionally, it might even be one of the world’s most famous players themselves.Regardless of the voice on the other end of the line, they all follow much the same pattern with Ferré, the genial, bearded editor in chief of the prestigious French soccer weekly France Football. They start by shooting the breeze, asking casually after Ferré’s general health. Then, they start to shift gear.They ask how preparations are going for the magazine’s annual gala, the one at which the men’s and women’s winners of the sport’s most coveted individual prize, the Ballon d’Or, will be announced. Fine, fine. Has the voting finished? Has it all gone well? Yes, yes. Ferré knows what comes next, the real reason for every call. They want to know the one thing he cannot tell them.There are, perhaps, two ways to best illustrate how jealously Ferré and his staff guard the identity of the winners of the Ballons d’Or. One is that he is one of only two people, even within the magazine, who knows who has won. The other is that the second, his trusted executive assistant, is only told in case something happens to him. “Imagine if I had an accident,” he said. “There would still have to be a Ballon d’Or.”Ferré cannot be coaxed into letting the name slip. “This is my sixth year in charge of the event,” he said. “I have not made a mistake yet.” All of those thinly veiled efforts to inveigle an answer are met with a stock response. “I don’t want to lie,” he said. He knows who has won. “But I tell them that I can’t share their name because the winners do not know yet, and it would not be right for them not to be the first to find out.”He leaves it until the last possible moment to invite the winners into his circle of trust. He was planning on informing this year’s winners this week, a few days before the gala at Paris’s Théâtre du Châtelet on Nov. 29. Even that is something of a concession to practicality: He has to alert them, he said, so he can make sure they know how the ceremony will work.It is only then that Ferré’s secret will be out of his control. For months beforehand, it is treated as a matter of the strictest confidentiality, protected by a regimen of such discretion that even Ferré will admit that it could, in a certain light, border on the “paranoiac.”In France Football’s offices, a book with a golden edge showcases the covers of the magazine with previous Ballon d’0r winners. James Hill for The New York TimesPreparations for the gala last, effectively, all year. But it is in late September that the work begins in earnest. Ten France Football staff members are tasked with putting together two lists: the 30 men’s players and the 20 women’s players who, they believe, warrant inclusion on the final shortlist. Once those names are submitted, they gather in the magazine’s office for what Ferré, gently, calls “a discussion.”In truth, of course, many of the names have a clear majority behind them. “For the men, maybe 20 or 22 players will be obvious to everyone,” he said. “We discuss the final eight or 10. The meetings can be long, two or three hours, but we need everyone to be proud of the final selection. It is not just the list of the chief. And we try not to forget anybody: We worked out a couple of years ago that, between us, we had watched 1,000 games or more that year. To be on the list at all is something very serious.”Once something approaching a consensus has been reached, France Football sends its shortlists to its jury of more than 170 vote-wielding journalists around the world (as well as announcing them in public) in early October.It is at this point that the veil of secrecy descends. The jurors — one per nation — submit their five choices, in order, to what Ferré describes as a “private email server.” Pressed on quite what form that takes, he demurred: The system is so secret that he declined to divulge even how it worked, except to say that only he and his secretary have access to it. The rest of the France Football staff are kept in the dark.“We are very careful,” he said. “But the identity of the winner of the Ballon d’Or is a big secret. There is not an equivalent in the rest of sport, I think.” He sounded vaguely doubtful when it was put to him that the most immediate parallel was, perhaps, the results of the Oscars.That the responsibility weighs so heavily on Ferré, and his magazine, should not be attributed to an inflated sense of their own importance. They treat the Ballon d’Or seriously because they know exactly how much it means to players. When Ferré called Luka Modric, the winner in 2018, to give him the news that he had won, the Croatian “cried like a child,” Ferré said.“It is Christmas for them,” he said. “It is the only chance you get in a team sport to celebrate by yourself.”It is a significance that only seems to grow with every passing year. The primacy of the Ballon d’Or is something of a curious phenomenon. In 2010, it was married to FIFA’s official equivalent, the World Player of the Year award, to become the FIFA Ballon d’Or.When that partnership ended, in 2015, and FIFA launched the imaginatively titled “The Best” awards, it would have been possible to believe that the Ballon d’Or’s luster might fade a little. Instead, the Ballon d’Or’s appeal only continues to grow. Kylian Mbappé has described it as “an ambition for any player who aspires to be the best.” His France teammate Paul Pogba made it plain several years ago that it was an award he was “aiming for.”Even Robert Lewandowski, who once scoffed at France Football’s choices — “I don’t know why one player finishes 50th and another 25th and another fifth,” he said in 2017 — has had a change of heart.Lewandowski, the Bayern Munich striker, was widely regarded as favorite to win the prize last year before it was canceled — not uncontroversially — because of the coronavirus pandemic. “My achievements answer this question,” he said when asked if he would be a deserving recipient. “It would mean a lot to me to win it.”Quite what lies at the root of that respect is open to debate. It could be that it is indicative of the sport’s gradual shift toward focusing on individual stars, rather than collective success, or the rise of a perception of players, first and foremost, as brands.“This is my sixth year in charge of the event,” Ferré said. “I have not made a mistake yet.”James Hill for The New York TimesIt may be that the rivalry between Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo to see who can win it the most has turned the award into a proxy measure of greatness. “Ronaldo has only one ambition, and that is to retire with more Ballons d’Or than Messi,” Ferré said, “and I know that because he has told me.”To Ferré, though, the award’s appeal is far more simple. The prize’s enduring glamour is rooted in its history. The Ballon d’Or has been running since 1956. George Best won a Ballon d’Or. Franz Beckenbauer and Alfredo Di Stéfano won two. Johan Cruyff won three. To claim one, to Ferré, is to claim a spot in the sport’s pantheon.“It is not to do with money,” he said. “It is only the trophy. But to have one is to have a place in history. I think that if you looked at the statistics of Messi and Ronaldo, you would see they always score a lot of goals in September and October, when the voting is happening. That is not a coincidence.”That is what is at stake as autumn draws in and the votes start to come through. It is that which explains why so many players and agents and executives simply cannot wait to find out if they, or their player, has won. And it is that which illustrates why Ferré and his magazine treat the name of their winner like a state secret until the last possible moment. Some things, after all, are worth the wait. More

  • 100 Shares119 Views

    in Soccer

    Manchester United Picks Ralf Rangnick as Interim Manager

    Rangnick, an architect of the Red Bull soccer empire, will take over as United’s manager while the club pursues a permanent replacement for Ole Gunnar Solskjaer.Ralf Rangnick, the architect of the rise of RB Leipzig and the man widely regarded as the forebear of much of modern German soccer, has landed the most high-profile post of his career, albeit on a temporary basis: the 63-year-old Rangnick is expected to be named Manchester United manager, perhaps as soon as today.After three tumultuous, emotional years, United finally parted with Ole Gunnar Solskjaer on Sunday, less than 24 hours after his team endured a humbling 4-1 defeat at Watford. That loss came only a few weeks after Solskjaer’s team, reinforced over the summer with the likes of Jadon Sancho and Cristiano Ronaldo, was humiliated in quick succession, at home, by both Liverpool and Manchester City.Michael Carrick, a member of Solskjaer’s coaching staff and like him a decorated player during a decade-long playing career at the club, took charge for United’s victory in the Champions League at Villarreal on Tuesday, but the team’s executives had made it clear that his appointment would be a brief one.In the aftermath of Solskjaer’s dismissal, United had determined that the best course of action was to appoint an experienced interim manager — to take the club through to the end of the season — while it considered a long-term replacement for Solskjaer. The club appeared to be working on the logic that there would be a fuller field of candidates for the permanent post available in the summer.While the likes of Ajax’s Erik ten Hag and Mauricio Pochettino are the most convincing contenders for the full-time role, United considered a variety of immediately available coaches for the caretaker position that has gone to Rangnick. Lucien Favre, formerly of Borussia Dortmund, and Rudi Garcia, a French champion with Lille, both were considered.It was Rangnick, though, who quickly emerged as the front-runner. He has spent much of the last decade establishing and fine-tuning the Red Bull network of clubs, taking posts at both Red Bull Salzburg and RB Leipzig. He helped turn the former into regulars in the Champions League and the latter into one of the most consistent clubs in Germany.He came to prominence, though, by guiding Hoffenheim — a team with little or no history, based in the village of Sinsheim — from the lower reaches of German soccer into the Bundesliga, and by teaching and playing an intense, fast-paced style of soccer that formed the theoretical basis for the likes of Jürgen Klopp and Thomas Tuchel. To many, Rangnick is the godfather of the German pressing game that now permeates most top-level European soccer.He left the Red Bull group last summer, and established his own consultancy firm, together with his longtime friend and confidante Lars Kornetka. The company had taken on a handful of clients — including Lokomotiv Moscow — hoping to tap in to Rangnick’s experience and his club-building expertise.Those teams have accepted that Rangnick will place those projects on hold while he takes charge at United. His managerial role will last only until the end of the season. He will then move into a consultant’s role at United once a new manager is in place. More