More stories

  • in

    Marc Guehi breaks silence after escaping FA action for message on rainbow armband for two games

    MARC GUEHI has broken his silence after writing a religious message on his Premier League captain’s armband. Guehi – a devout Christian – was warned by the FA not to repeat his actions after writing “I love Jesus” on his armband for Saturday’s 1-1 draw with Newcastle.Marc Guehi broke his silence after writing a religious message on his captain’s armbandCredit: PAHe escaped any FA punishmentCredit: GettyOn Tuesday night, the Eagles skipper ignored the warning as he wrote “Jesus loves you” on his armband as Palace beat Ipswich 1-0. Now, Guehi has spoken out for the first time telling Sky Sports: “I think the message was pretty clear to be honest. “It’s a message of love and truth as well and a message of inclusivity, so it speaks for itself.” The FA do not plan any formal disciplinary action towards Guehi – despite the breach of Rule A4.READ MORE IN football Instead, they have reminded Palace of the kit regulations that are in place.The Laws of the Game allow slogans “promoting the game of football, respect and integrity”.But the Laws forbid “political, religious or personal slogans, statements or images”.Breaching this requirement is a strict liability situation with the Laws adding: “For any offence the player and/or the team will be sanctioned by the competition organiser, national football association or by FIFA.”Most read in FootballFA have disappeared down a rabbit hole again with absurd double standardsBy Dave Kidd Cast your mind back two years to the World Cup in Qatar.There, the FA and Harry Kane insisted that the England skipper would wear a rainbow armband in support of the LGBTQ+ community, after FIFA had awarded hosting rights to a nation which criminalises homosexuality.Six other western European nations were going to take the same stand.Until the point when FIFA insisted that those captains making this “political” gesture would be booked.Until the point where that gesture might have some sporting consequence – and therefore a more substantial meaning.At that point, the FA and their six allies all performed a late U-turn. They bottled it.That’s the thing with English football and its “support” for the LGBTQ+ community.READ THE FULL COLUMN HERE The Guehi issue, and Ipswich skipper Sam Morsy’s refusal to wear the rainbow armband on “religious” grounds, will put a spotlight on the campaign that has been part of the Premier League’s season since 2013.Guehi, whose dad is a minister, was one of 19 top flight captains who wore the armband in the weekend fixtures to support the Premier League’s Rainbow Laces campaign in support of LGBTQ+ rights.Ipswich’s Morsy was the only skipper to snub wearing the armband.Speaking after Tuesday’s game, which Palace won 1-0 to ease relegation concerns, manager Oliver Glasner backed his captain.Glasner said: “We respect every single player and especially Marc as our captain.”He’s a great guy, very humble and we shouldn’t make it bigger than it is. Keep it calm. He’s very respectful to everyone in the club.”In football we’re all against discrimination, against abuse, every single part. It was a great campaign and I think that’s it.”We spoke about it. I speak to Marc quite often, he’s my captain. He’s no child who is 15, he’s an adult person like every one of us.READ MORE SUN STORIES”He has his opinion and we accept and respect every opinion. This is the quote of this campaign, being tolerant and Marc is very tolerant so everything is fine.”Meanwhile, Man Utd’s players abandoned plans to wear a jacket in support of the LGBTQ+ community after Noussair Mazraoui refused to join the initiative ahead of their 4-0 win over Everton. More

  • in

    The FA have disappeared down a rabbit hole again with absurd double standards over Morsy and Guehi rainbow armband row

    CAST your mind back two years to the World Cup in Qatar.There, the FA and Harry Kane insisted that the England skipper would wear a rainbow armband in support of the LGBTQ+ community, after FIFA had awarded hosting rights to a nation which criminalises homosexuality.Crystal Palace captain Marc Guehi wrote ‘I love Jesus’ on his rainbow armbandCredit: RexGuehi was then warned for writing ‘Jesus loves you’ on the armbandCredit: GettyIpswich captain Sam Morsy didn’t wear a rainbow armbandCredit: GettySix other western European nations were going to take the same stand.Until the point when FIFA insisted that those captains making this “political” gesture would be booked.Until the point where that gesture might have some sporting consequence – and therefore a more substantial meaning. At that point, the FA and their six allies all performed a late U-turn. They bottled it.Read More on FootballThat’s the thing with English football and its “support” for the LGBTQ+ community.They are happy to show them support by virtue signalling with meaningless gestures. Meaningful gestures, not so much.Two years later, the FA have disappeared down a rabbit hole again with their absurd double standards in allowing Ipswich captain Sam Morsy – a practising Muslim – not to wear a rainbow armband, while reprimanding Crystal Palace skipper Marc Guehi – a devout Christian – for daubing his armband with the words “I love Jesus” and then “Jesus Loves You”.This is patent nonsense. It is discrimination wrapped up in the excuse of a “rules is rules” technicality. Most read in FootballEnglish football wanted to make a stand against the staging of the World Cup in Qatar.But when it comes to allowing Newcastle to be funded by the Saudi regime – which subjugates women and criminalises homosexuality – or for the Abu Dhabi government to bankroll Manchester City, it turns a blind eye.England star Marc Guéhi’s talks about his father’s faith and missing church on Sundays When England defender Guehi – the son of a Christian minister – made his first stand in Saturday’s 1-1 draw against Newcastle, visiting captain Bruno Guimaraes dutifully wore his rainbow armband.Yet the regime which is allowed to pay his wages clearly doesn’t share the values this armband supposedly represents.On Tuesday, by quirk of the fixture list, Guehi and Morsy – a British-born Egypt international – were pitted against one another, further highlighting the absurdity of one man being allowed not to wear an armband and another man being warned for writing on that armband.Then there is the case of Manchester United’s Muslim defender Noussair Mazraoui refusing to wear a specially-designed pre-match warm-up jacket to mark the club’s Rainbow Laces match against Everton.As a result, United decided none of their players would wear the jackets so as not to disrupt team unity.So United wanted to show support for LGBTQ+ rights – but only until the point that it became difficult for them.Lot of work to be donePersonally, I feel grateful not to have been brought up with any religion in my life and believe that any organised religion causes more harm than good.But I also recognise Guehi, Morsy, Mazraoui and anyone else with religious faith has every right to practice their beliefs.I also consider the principle behind the rainbow campaign to be a sound one.That people should be free to love whomever they want to love, and not have to hide their sexuality.In an increasingly secular society, most people agree with that basic statement.Inclusivity shouldn’t be a dirty word. Gay people have, with good reason, felt excluded from participating in football and attending matches.Sometimes it’s meaninglessThe fact that there still aren’t any openly “out” gay footballers in the Premier League suggests there remains a lot of work to be done.But when campaigns are besmirched by such absurdities as the FA’s capitulation in Qatar and the double standards shown to Guehi and Morsy, they simply stoke the beliefs of intolerant people and are self-defeating. They give credence to the idea that the FA are a fanatically “woke” organisation, when that isn’t the case.The FA, and English football in general, are simply desperate to recognise everyone and everything all the time.It is rare to attend an England match without a minute’s silence. Which usually turns into applause.Often with a recently-deceased former England player or manager being offered a silence in association with the victims of some terrible war or natural disaster overseas. Rendering it all pretty meaningless.Opposite of ‘wokeness’It also feels weird that before every England game, there are around 100 serving military personnel on the pitch.Even weirder when, last month, the opposition was the Republic of Ireland, whose population are understandably not keen on the sight of uniformed British squaddies.This is actually the opposite of “wokeness” – whatever that means – and it is jarring just the same.Then there’s Remembrance Day. I happen to wear a poppy – or, more often, I buy several and lose them all – as a personal mark of respect to relatives who fought and died, and a recognition of my own good fortune in not having had to suffer the same horrors as my grandfather and great-grandfather.But football has taken Remembrance Day to extreme degrees – with The Last Post being played and silences observed as early as October.And it also allows James McClean, an open supporter of IRA terrorism, to make his own views known. Views which are abhorrent to most of us.READ MORE SUN STORIESGesture politics in football have become an ugly moral maze – underlined by the idiocy surrounding the treatment of Guehi and Morsy.In an angry and divided nation, the only intelligent conclusion is that football should be a safe space – away from politics, religion, the military or any other cause. More

  • in

    Erling Haaland just a ‘normal player’, says Van der Vaart as he slams Man City over summer transfer

    FORMER Premier League star Rafael van der Vaart has slammed Erling Haaland amid Manchester City’s woeful form.The champions have not won any of their last seven games and their star striker has scored just three times in this run.Erling Haaland has been labelled a ‘normal player’ amid City’s poor runCredit: GettyRafael van der Vaart also slammed City’s recruitmentCredit: GettyEx-Tottenham cult hero Van der Vaart did not hold back in his criticism of Pep Guardiola’s side.The outspoken Dutchman brutally hit out at Haaland, claiming he is overrated.Van der Vaart told BetMGM: “Take away his pace, I see Erling Haaland as a normal player.“Technique-wise, he’s not good enough and he can get away with it when City are on form but not when they’re struggling.READ MORE IN FOOTBALL“I just think he is missing something that those top, top strikers have.”I might get criticised for that opinion, but I don’t see him at the same level as the top strikers I played with like Ruud van Nistelrooy.“Manchester City need Erling Haaland at the moment, but where is he? “That’s why he’s not among that select few world-class strikers.”Most read in FootballFOOTBALL FREE BETS AND SIGN UP DEALSVan der Vaart also claimed that City’s transfer business has been poor and their star players are out of energy after winning four Premier League titles in a row.He added: “I think the intensity that Man City have shown under Pep Guardiola for so many seasons is over. Erling Haaland does pull ups on cliff edge and runs with wolves as Man City ace stars in insane Beats by Dre advert “They look very tired to me. You can see it in their faces, Kevin De Bruyne for example, they’re not fresh anymore.“They need a rebuild. I’m not one who says they need to get rid of Pep, no chance. “I believe in his coaching methods but they need to get their transfers right.”Ilkay Gundogan was not what they needed in the summer.” More

  • in

    Man Utd LGBTQ+ group slam club for ditching rainbow jackets over Mazraoui decision with players ‘left unhappy’

    A MANCHESTER UNITED LGBTQ+ supporters group has issued a statement in response to the team’s decision not to wear a rainbow jacket at the weekend.The Red Devils had planned to wear a pride-themed rainbow jacket prior to their Premier League clash with Everton on Sunday.A Man Utd LGBTQ+ supporters group has issued a statement after Noussair Mazraoui refused to wear a rainbow jacket at the weekendCredit: PAHis Man Utd team-mates chose not to wear the jacket with him, but captain Bruno Fernandes wore a Rainbow Laces armband during the matchCredit: GettyHowever, just a matter of hours before kick-off they made a collective decision not to.The Athletic has claimed that Noussair Mazraoui told his team-mates that he was not prepared to sport it due to his Muslim faith.As a result, the team did not want him to be the only person seen publicly refusing to wear the item of clothing and so decided that nobody would.It has been suggested that not everyone in the dressing room was happy about the decision.Read More in FootballMan Utd have now come under fire for the move, with LGBTQ+ group Rainbow Devils among those who have voiced their discontent.A statement from the supporters group read: “As part of this year’s Rainbow Laces campaign, Rainbow Devils worked closely with – and had great support from – Manchester United and the Fan Engagement team.”This has included working with the Manchester United Foundation to spread the message of inclusivity with local schools, to a Q&A with two Men’s first team players, to supportive messages from many Men and Women first team players (including an individual one from captain Bruno Fernandes). Even a pitchside event at Old Trafford on Sunday ahead of the Everton game.”On this latter occasion, which was United’s official Rainbow Laces game, the players were due to wear specially designed jackets pre-match to mark the occasion.Most read in Football”Shortly before the game, Rainbow Devils was informed that these jackets would not be worn. The reason being that one of the matchday squad had refused to wear the jacket on the grounds of their personally held beliefs. Therefore, to maintain the team ethos and togetherness, none of the players would be wearing them.”This was obviously a great disappointment to Rainbow Devils, but also to all those who had worked hard at the club to deliver this event.Tony Young dead at 71: Man Utd pay tribute to former star as he passes away “We are aware of who the player concerned is, but we feel it isn’t our role to single him out, and risk spoiling all the other positive things that the majority of those at the club have done.”We respect the right of this player to have his own views, whilst also feeling disappointed that he put the rest of the squad into a position where they felt that they couldn’t wear their jackets.”We also worry what kind of negative effect this incident might have on any player at the club who may be struggling with their sexuality.”Rainbow Devils will continue to work with Manchester United to support inclusivity, through the One Love initiative and others, as we all continue our work to ensure all LGBTQ+ people feel safe and welcome at Old Trafford, both on and off the pitch.”Man Utd have worn a pride-themed jersey and jacket ahead of certain games over the last two seasons during the Rainbow Laces period.Club captain Bruno Fernandes wore the Rainbow Laces armband throughout the Everton match, reflecting the club’s support for the campaign.He described wearing his rainbow-coloured armband as “a sign of respect” that makes LGBTQ+ fans “feel supported” by the players.Ipswich Town captain Sam Morsy, who is also a practising Muslim, refused to wear a rainbow armband for religious reasons in his club’s two Rainbow Laces fixtures.And Crystal Palace star Marc Guehi was spoken to by the Football Association on Tuesday after writing a religious message on his.READ MORE SUN STORIESGuehi, 24, who is a devout Christian, was warned by the FA not to repeat his actions after writing “I love Jesus” on his armband for Saturday’s 1-1 draw with Newcastle.But on Tuesday the Palace skipper ignored it and wrote “Jesus loves you” on his armband during the 1-0 victory at Ipswich.Crystal Palace captain Marc Guehi wrote a message on his armband for the last two gamesCredit: PAMeanwhile, Ipswich Town’s Sam Morsy refused to wear itCredit: Reuters More

  • in

    Major broadcast decision as Fifa Club World Cup 2025 lands £790million TV deal

    UK-BASED streaming giant DAZN has won the broadcast rights to Fifa’s new Club World Cup.In a deal that has been rumoured for weeks, the company, whose headquarters are in London, agreed a £790m contract to screen all 63 matches in the inaugural tournament.DAZN has won the broadcast rights to Fifa’s new Club World CupMan City are the reigning Club World Cup championsCredit: GettyFifa President Gianni Infantino will be in Miami to help conduct the draw in which the fate of the 32 teams, including Chelsea, Manchester City, Jude Bellingham’s Real Madrid and Harry Kane’s Bayern Munich, will be known.And the confirmation of the DAZN deal – with suggestions that it might lead to significant investment in the company from Saudi Arabia – will add further impetus to Infantino’s belief that the tournament will be a major success.Unlike the World Cup, the new tournament is not one of the UK’s “listed events” that must be screened on free to air terrestrial television.But the terms of the DAZN deal will ensure that the matches will all be freely available through the streaming platform.READ MORE IN football Hailing a “landmark agreement”, Fifa said the entire tournament would be “live-streamed, free to view on DAZN worldwide” although the company could sub-license games to linear broadcasters in markets.Infantino said: “This deal means every single football fan across the globe can watch the best players from the 32 best clubs compete in the new Fifa Club World Cup to be the first official ‘Fifa Club World Champions’.“The new Fifa Club World Cup is a merit-based, inclusive tournament that will be the pinnacle of global club football, capturing the imagination of players and fans across the world. “Through this broadcasting agreement, billions of football fans worldwide can now watch what will be the most widely accessible club football tournament ever – and FOR FREE.”Most read in FootballAll 32 Club World Cup Teams Pot 1: Manchester City (England), Real Madrid (Spain), Bayern Munich (Germany), PSG (France), Flamengo (Brazil), Palmeiras (Brazil), River Plate (Argentina), and Fluminense (Brazil)Pot 2: Chelsea (England), Borussia Dortmund (Germany), Inter (Italy), Porto (Portugal), Atlético de Madrid (Spain), Juventus (Italy), and Salzburg (Austria).Pot 3: Al Hilal (Saudi Arabia), Ulsan HD (South Korea), Al Ahly FC (Egypt), Wydad AC (Morocco), Monterrey (Mexico), Club León (Mexico), Boca Juniors (Argentina), and Botafogo (Brazil).Pot 4: Urawa Red Diamonds (Japan), Al Ain FC (UAE), Esperance (Tunisia), Mamelodi Sundowns FC (South Africa), Pachuca (Mexico), Seattle Sounders FC (USA), Auckland City (Australia), and Inter Miami (USA).CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERSThe US – who will also be hosting the World Cup proper in 2026 alongside Mexico and Canada – will offer up 12 stadiums for the tournament.The chosen grounds range from capacities of 20,000 to a whopping 88,500.Matches will stretch from coast to coast with games played in iconic US cities like Los Angeles, Nashville and Washington D.C. More

  • in

    Why Enzo Maresca playing Moises Caicedo at right-back could be the secret to unlocking Cole Palmer for Chelsea

    WHEN Chelsea made the decision in the summer to Enzo Maresca as their new head coach there was some unrest amongst fans.The Italian coach was unpopular amongst Leicester supporters despite leading them to promotion back to the Premier League at the first attempt and he was still seen as a coach who lacked the experience required to be successful at the highest level.Moises Caicedo excelled in his new role as a makeshift right-backCredit: GettyCaicedo’s link-up play in possession and aggression out of possession allowed Cole Palmer (centre) to flourishCredit: AlamyEnzo Maresca was appointed with little fanfare but his tactical nous is starting to win Chelsea fans overCredit: GettyThis unrest was also due to the fact that the previous Chelsea coach, Mauricio Pochettino, had begun to impress towards the end of last season and many thought that he deserved more time.It is fair to say, however, that those fans who were unhappy with the appointment with Maresca at Stamford Bridge will be starting to change their minds.Not only do Chelsea currently sit third in the table, a huge improvement over the last two seasons, they are also playing some very impressive football under Maresca.The former Sevilla star was thought to be a disciple of the Pep Guardiola school of football and indeed he has spent time coaching in the City Group system.READ MORE CHELSEA NEWSAt Chelsea, however, he has very quickly shown himself to be more tactically flexible than expected and has created different tactical systems that are built to make the most of some of the specific talents that he has in his squad.This past weekend saw Chelsea overcome Aston Villa 3-0 in a comfortable victory. One of the most interesting aspects of the game was the fact that Maresca chose to use £115m midfielder Moises Caicedo as a right-back, although one that regularly inverted into the midfield.This positional change for Caicedo was a masterstroke and saw him run things for Chelsea when he came into the midfield to provide an overload and create space further forward for more attacking teammates.Most read in FootballFOOTBALL FREE BETS AND SIGN UP DEALSIt is this space that will be key for Chelsea and Maresca.This is because this space it can be exploited by Cole Palmer, who has emerged into one of the most dangerous attacking midfielders in the game today.Chelsea player ratings vs Aston Villa article (1)By getting Palmer on the ball in space in more advanced positions, we are likely to see Chelsea become more dominant against opposition teams both in terms of creating and scoring chances.Palmer is the key for Chelsea and, as such, creating space for him is incredibly important.Here’s how Caicedo’s positional change transformed things for the Blues and bamboozled Aston Villa.CAICEDO CREATED SPACE FOR PALMERIn this match both teams set up with slightly different shapes but three men in the midfield.Chelsea played in a 4-3-3 and Aston Villa in a 4-2-3-1 and, as such, they were equally matched centrally.Here, the movement and positioning from Caicedo from right-back into midfield when Chelsea were in possession was key.This movement created a 4v3 advantage for Chelsea and freed up space that Cole Palmer could move into.By creating this overload, Caicedo essentially released Palmer, Chelsea’s most dangerous attacking player this season.The movement and positioning from the England star ended up creating continuous problems for the opposition as the Blues drove forward.Caicedo’s positioning helped give Palmer the freedom of the final thirdBy moving inside into these positions we saw Caicedo taking possession in and around the final third. The movement to enter into spaces and get on the ball saw him given time on the ball and his ability to pass and break lines released the runs of Palmer into space.Chelsea were able continuously in this game to overload the central areas of the pitch and to draw the Aston Villa midfielders towards the ball.This meant that Palmer was free to move into space between the Villa midfield and their defensive line.In these situations, we saw Chelsea look to play first into the midfield, where Caicedo and Lavia could gain possession, and then quickly force the ball through to Palmer.Caicedo was able to win the battle in a congested midfield area, freeing up PalmerHere we see the way that the central areas get congested with a lot of players congregating around the ball. Caicedo is able to get on the ball and force the ball through to Palmer who can then turn and drive forward in possession.It is interesting that Maresca was able to create these situations with Caicedo moving inside to make the space that Palmer could exploit.Indeed, creating tactical solutions that free up your most dangerous attacking players in this way is a sign that Maresca is a very capable tactical coach.OVERLOADING THE MIDFIELD AND HOW THAT FREES UP PALMERDuring the Aston Villa game, Maresca employed a 4-3-3 with Romeo Lavia sitting as the deepest midfielder behind Enzo Fernandez and Cole Palmer as more advanced midfielders.Moving Palmer inside from his position on the right-wing would prove to be one of the keys to Chelsea’s victory as the match went on.With Moises Caicedo, most often used as a deeper central midfielder, playing at right-back we saw Maresca create an opportunity to have the Ecuadorian come inside when Chelsea were in possession to give them an overload in the centre of the pitch.Throughout this game, we saw Caicedo move inside to form a double pivot with Lavia in central areas and from these positions Chelsea were able to control and dominate the flow of the game. The timing of Caicedo when coming inside to create passing angles allowed Chelsea to routinely and easily play through the press from Aston Villa.The timing of Caicedo’s runs allowed Chelsea to easily play through the Aston Villa pressHere, we see Caicedo coming inside early in the game as Chelsea were building from the back. His timing to arrive in a pocket of space allows him to receive the ball from the central defender and his ability to open out in possession to drive forwards allows him to move quickly into space.When Caicedo came inside in possession we did, of course, see him actively allow Chelsea to move the ball into the middle third.But it was his ability once he received the ball in these situations that really made the difference.When coming into possession centrally, Caicedo was generally able to lose markers and step forwards to progress the ball or to play more progressive passes that broke the lines and moved Chelsea into the final third.This movement to receive the ball and ability to take the ball and progress the play himself saw Caicedo act as, essentially, the key in the Chelsea system. While Fernandez and Palmer were able to push forward, we saw Caicedo and Lavia come together to provide the platform for the Chelsea attack.Caicedo’s positional sense as a midfielder allowed him to create passing opportunities even for players on the left like Marc CucurellaOnce again here we see the key role that Caicedo played for Chelsea in terms of ball progression. With Marc Cucurella in possession of the ball at left-back it is Caicedo who crashes towards the ball to receive the pass between lines and allow the press to be broken.In having Caicedo start from right-back and then time his movements inside to receive passes and play forward we saw Maresca create the structure to really dominate the game.OUT OF POSSESSIONDespite being more naturally a central midfielder, Caicedo is a player who is very strong from a defensive perspective.He typically plays as the deeper midfielder in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 and his positioning and movement defensively is effective in terms of breaking up opposition attacks.Indeed, it was his defensive ability and ability to cover ground and be effective against the ball that really stood out when he was initially coming through in the English game at Brighton and Hove Albion.This meant that when he moved out to right-back for this game we saw Caicedo play effectively in defensive moments as he covered a great deal of space on the right-side of the defensive unit for Chelsea.He was aggressive and intelligent with his positioning, although the way that he played defensively was not the same way that we would typically see from a right-back.He was more narrow typically and willing to be aggressive in stepping out and defending over longer distances than a typical right-back.Caicedo was quick to put pressure on opponents out of possessionIn this example we can see that Aston Villa were more narrow in their defensive shape. This meant that Caicedo was relatively narrow but quick to move out to engage the ball and put pressure on the opposition player that was looking to receive the ball.It was interesting in this match that for large parts of the game Chelsea were very aggressive against the ball as they looked to press high and stop Aston Villa from being able to play out comfortably from the back.They were able to be so aggressive defensively because at the base of the midfield Romeo Lavia, and Moises Caicedo from the right-side, were so comfortable in terms of defending in large areas of space.Chelsea were aggressive in preventing Aston Villa from playing out from the backIn this example from the match we see how aggressive Chelsea are in terms of pushing players forward and into advanced areas in order to pin Aston Villa in and prevent them from being able to comfortably play out from the back.As the goalkeeper for Villa does play longer it is Caicedo who is quick and aggressive in terms of jumping and engaging over a longer distance to regain possession.The aggression and positional intelligence that Caicedo showed in this game when playing as the right-back was key for Chelsea in terms of how they set up against the ball.CONCLUSIONREAD MORE SUN STORIESIt will be interesting to see whether Maresca continues to use Caicedo in this role now that it has proved successful and whether it can continue to work to create space and time for Palmer to thrive.There is no doubt, however, that from what we have seen so far this season, Maresca belongs at the highest level of coaching. More

  • in

    Liverpool offer Virgil van Dijk new contract and are set to finally try to tie Mo Salah down to new deal

    LIVERPOOL captain Virgil van Dijk has been offered a new contract, according to reports.The Prem leaders, who are nine points clear of Arsenal and Chelsea, are now expected to follow suit by offering Mohamed Salah an extension.Virgil van Dijk has reportedly been offered a new Liverpool dealLiverpool need to move fast to nail Mo Salah and Trent Alexander-Arnold downThe Reds are bidding to end uncertainty over Van Dijk’s future by tying the Netherlands star down to a new agreement.The defender, who earns £220,000-per-week, is amongst a trio of Liverpool stars at risk of being allowed to leave the club for free.Van Dijk, Trent Alexander-Arnold and the club’s highest earner Salah all have a few months remaining on their deals.But Liverpool have kicked things off with an opening bid to keep Van Dijk, 33, beyond June, according to The Athletic.READ MORE FOOTBALL NEWSHowever, the proposal reportedly fell short of his expectations and so far there has been no breakthrough on the value or length of an extension.All three are Liverpool legends and have played a crucial role in the Reds’ brilliant start to the season under new boss Arne Slot.Liverpool have also taken “concrete steps” in contract negotiations with Salah.The 32-year-old winger’s future has taken precedence among fans and media.Most read in FootballFOOTBALL FREE BETS AND SIGN UP DEALSThe Egyptian superstar had dropped multiple hints that his eight-year reign at Anfield might be coming to an end.After Sunday’s 2-0 win over Man City, he said: “Honestly that’s what’s in my head — this is in all probability the last City game I will play for Liverpool so I am just going to enjoy it.Jamie Carragher slams Mo Salah over ‘selfish’ interview after Liverpool star reveals he’s ‘more out than in'”The atmosphere was incredible so I will enjoy every second here.”Last month he told Sky Sports that “no offer” had been made to extend his stay.So far the club’s owners, FSG, have refused to bow to his wage demands and he knows there would be mega money on offer in the Saudi Pro League.Salah again underlined his importance to the Reds and their title pursuit as he took his tally for the season to 13.Boyhood Liverpool fan Alexander-Arnold, meanwhile, has also not been offered a contract extension yet.He has been repeatedly linked with a move away to join England best pal Jude Bellingham at Real Madrid.In theory, the 26-year-old right-back is free to sign a pre-contract agreement with an overseas club in January, with his current contract set to expire in June.Meanwhile, Van Dijk and Salah have started every Prem game this season, as has midfielder Ryan Gravenberch.READ MORE SUN STORIESSalah previously signed a long-term extension in 2022 at a time when his future was under similar concern before putting pen-to-paper on a £350,000-per-week deal.Liverpool currently sit top of the Prem with 34 points from a possible 39, having only lost 1-0 to Nottingham Forest.Five Mo Salah strops at LiverpoolFive times things have got heated during Mo Salah’s Liverpool career.West Ham 2 Liverpool 2 – April 28, 2024Salah gets into a heated argument with Klopp as he refuses to shake the manager’s hand before coming on at the London Stadium.Liverpool 3 Sheffield United 1 – April 4, 2024Salah shakes his head as he is subbed off during Liverpool’s 3-1 win over the basement club.Chelsea 1 Liverpool 1 – August 13, 2023Salah storms off the pitch after being replaced on 77 minutes on the first day of the season.Brighton 1 Liverpool 1 – November 28, 2020Salah throws his arms up in the air and barely looks at Klopp after being subbed off. Brighton go on to equalise with a last minute penalty.Burnley 0 Liverpool 3 – August 31, 2019Salah gets in a public spat with Sadio Mane after failing to pass to the winger. Team-mate Roberto Firmino says the row had been brewing for some time.Read the full article from Jack Rosser More

  • in

    Why is Kobbie Mainoo NOT playing for Man Utd against Arsenal?

    MANCHESTER UNITED travel to the Emirates to take on old rivals Arsenal in a blockbuster clash TONIGHT.Ruben Amorim claimed his first three points in the Premier League last weekend after the Red Devils thrashed Everton 4-0.Manchester United thrashed Everton 4-0 last time outCredit: AFPJoshua Zirkzee and Marcus Rashford were at the double as Man Utd look to climb the table under their new young coach.Amorim will face his toughest test yet this evening as his team face a rampant Arsenal side fresh from a 5-2 win over West Ham.The Gunners will be looking to close the gap on league leaders Liverpool, with the Reds’ lead at the top now nine points.Man Utd will be without a number of key players for their trip to the Emirates, including midfield superstar Kobbie Mainoo – SunSport has the reason why.READ MORE IN FOOTBALLWhy is Kobbie Mainoo NOT playing for Man Utd against Arsenal?Kobbie Mainoo will NOT be available for Man Utd’s Premier League clash with Arsenal tonight.The midfielder picked up his fifth yellow card in the top flight against Everton on Sunday – meaning he now faces a one-match ban.Mainoo received his caution for a foul on Dwight McNeil on the edge of the area early in the second half.The Man Utd scarlet will be back in the fold for the Red Devil’s home clash with Nottingham Forest on Saturday, December 7.Most read in FootballHow to watch Arsenal vs Man Utd FREEArsenal’s blockbuster clash with Manchester United will be broadcast live on Amazon Prime Video.The streaming giants will be exclusively airing 20 Premier League fixtures this December.Should you not currently hold an Amazon Prime subscription, you can sign up for a free 30-day trial, which will give you access to all the benefits of being a Prime member, including streaming Arsenal vs Man Utd. More