in

Chelsea fans see right through ’embarrassing’ home kit launch as they spot two major flaws


CHELSEA have been called “embarrassing” after their new home kit was released without a sponsor.

The Blues unveiled their retro 2023-24 home shirt despite still being in the hunt for a replacement for previous sponsor Three.

Chelsea have released their new home kitCredit: https://www.instagram.com/chelseafc/
The Blues’ retro shirt is modelled on the 90sCredit: https://www.instagram.com/chelseafc/
Enzo Fernandez and Reece James modelled the designCredit: https://www.instagram.com/chelseafc/

The West Londoners’ £40m a season deal with the mobile phone provider expired at the end of last season.

Todd Boehly and Co had negotiated a deal with streaming platform Paramount+, which was vetoed by the Premier League.

Prem chiefs deemed that the partnership could upset rights holders by promoting a rival.

Chelsea were then set to enter a deal with gambling company Stake.

Read More Football Stories

But this fell through due to a fan backlash.

Prem clubs will be banned from having gambling companies as shirt sponsors from the 2026-27 season onwards.

Amid their sponsorship dilemma, Chelsea have released their new kit without one – although the launch came with a caveat.

The new home shirt will not be available to fans until August 16 at the earliest – after the Blues have already kicked off their Premier League campaign.

Most read in Football

BETTING SPECIAL – BEST NO DEPOSIT CASINO OFFERS

Sam Kerr and Millie Bright show off the sponsor-less kitCredit: https://www.instagram.com/chelseafc/

Chelsea’s launch also warns: “Fans should be aware that the 2023-24 home kit that features on pitch may subsequently feature a front-of-shirt partner.”

This would leave fans having forked out for a shirt that looks different to the one being worn on the pitch.

According to the Mail, Blues insiders have revealed that fans could be sent iron-on sponsor patches, should they strike a new agreement.

Telegraph reporter Matt Law pointed out the flaws, labelling them as “embarrassing”.

One fan subsequently wrote: “Starting selling at the end of summer is a terrible decision.”

While a second added: “Most fans prefer a shirt without a sponsor now.. however it’s pretty poor that it’s not on sale until after the season starts.”

A third tweeted: “In other words make double money as people will buy the kit with nothing on and then the one with a sponsor whenever it does come out.”

Many, however, wouldn’t mind if the kit remained without a sponsor, with one commenting: “I don’t find it embarrassing, our new shirt looks nice. It’s a win. We can get it in a few weeks. We also know why it’s delayed.”

Another added: “I want it without sponsor partner.”

Read More on The Sun

A further social media user opined: “It looks even better without the shirt partner. We love this.”

Someone else then pointed out: “After the disaster last season I’m intrigued to see so many Chelsea fans supporting the owners in this scenario.”

The kit could have a sponsor added at a later dateCredit: https://www.instagram.com/chelseafc/


Source: Soccer - thesun.co.uk


Tagcloud:

Shakira sings on her way to Silverstone F1 before being spotted in Mercedes VIP lounge amid Lewis Hamilton ‘romance’

Fans praise Sky Sports F1 host Martin Brundle’s ‘absolute brutality’ towards rude Cara Delevingne as she breaks silence