PAUL SCHOLES believes England should appoint Pep Guardiola as manager.
The Three Lions have begun their search for Gareth Southgate’s successor with Eddie Howe and Graham Potter the frontrunners to land the role.
But SunSport understands England are set to appoint Under-21 boss Lee Carsley as interim manager.
And the FA are reportedly willing to wait a year to hire their dream manager – Guardiola.
Former Manchester United and England player Paul Scholes agrees with that choice, claiming the Spaniard would be able to England “over the line”.
He told Sky Sports: “This group of players is the best we’ve had for a while, they play football. Almost as in the Man City way, the Pep Guardiola way.
READ MORE IN FOOTBALL
“Technically very good, they can keep the ball all day long. They just suffered in a couple of areas, they couldn’t really score or create as many chances as they would have liked.
“I think somebody like, I don’t like to say it but Pep [Guardiola] with this group of players, I think he would get them over the line.
“Look if that’s possible I don’t know but I think he’d be the ideal man to take this team forward.”
Guardiola is out of contract next year and has hinted the upcoming season could be his last at the Etihad.
Most read in Football
BEST FREE BET SIGN UP OFFERS FOR UK BOOKMAKERS
The FA would love to lure Guardiola to Wembley, and are ready to hold off appointing a long-term manager until they have spoken to the Spaniard.
However, should Carsley do well as interim boss, he could end up getting the job.
Mauricio Pochettino is also being considered while Thomas Tuchel has thrown his hat into the ring for the job.
Harry Redknapp: Lampard or Gerrard should be next England manager
I’VE a message for all those who reckon the search for England’s next manager is a two-horse race — you’re bang on!
And while we’re at it, here’s another… I bet very few of you have narrowed it down to the same couple of candidates as me.
If the odds are spot-on, finding Gareth Southgate’s replacement is a toss-up between Eddie Howe and Graham Potter.
Well in my book it’s a straight head-to-head, too. But I’m even more convinced that the men I see as obvious front-runners will be lucky to even get an interview.
I doubt there are many who’d agree with me either, when I say the FA should look no further than Steven Gerrard or Frank Lampard for the next Three Lions boss.
Either of them could do the job standing on their head, yet probably neither will get so much as a phone call.
Mind you, plenty of people will insist there’s no reason why they should because they’ve already written off both as failures.
Forgetting that Frank reached an FA Cup final and finished fourth in his first spell at Chelsea.
Or the fact that Everton were in such a mess, he never had a prayer when he went there.
There’s every chance they’ll gloss over Stevie’s time at Rangers, despite their first title win in a decade — unbeaten as well — and say he was a flop at Aston Villa.
But you show me a manager who’s not had a tough time of it somewhere down the line. Potter certainly did at Chelsea — he only lasted 31 games and lost 11 of them.
So did Unai Emery, the man who replaced Stevie as boss at Villa, when he was Arsenal manager. It happens to everyone out there.
So what’s the difference between Potter and Frank?
Why is one an obvious candidate for England, yet the other not even worthy of a mention?
Nothing against Eddie or Graham, by the way. Eddie’s doing well enough at Newcastle without absolutely tearing it up.
And Potter did a good job at Brighton before Chelsea but he had good recruitment and was working with good players.
Look at some of the names he had and where they ended up.
Alexis Mac Allister won the World Cup and went to Liverpool. Leandro Trossard is at Arsenal, Marc Cucurella and Moises Caicedo joined Chelsea, Yves Bissouma is with Tottenham.
There’s no doubt Potter or Howe would be a safe pair of hands. A steady Eddie. Just like Gareth was eight years ago — which is why they will probably get a chance.
But if the FA want someone steeped in football knowledge — at international level too — and who knows the game inside out at that level, both Frank and Stevie leave them standing.
The players would love it as well. They’d be desperate to play for them.
They would have nothing but respect whether it was Lampard or Gerrard as boss.
So, are they both on the scrapheap for good because they’ve had a failure somewhere down the line? There won’t be any managers left before long if that’s all it takes.
And here’s another thing as well. While you need a thick skin to be a club manager, it’s not a patch on the one demanded at international level.
That goes for players — certainly the senior ones — as well. And Stevie and Frank could tell you all about that better than most.
Some of the stuff Frank had to put up with back in the day was horrendous, horrible stuff.
It was the same for Gerro, especially when he was captain.
But the pair of them stood up and came through it. And that’s the sort of character you want and need as England manager.
It’s not about being a fantastic coach. When do you really get the chance to prove that with England? You don’t.
You’re not out there every day doing shape, shadow play and the like. For one thing you tend to pick the team at the last minute because you don’t want it leaking out!
It’s about managing, not coaching and there is a difference. It’s about picking the best players in the right positions.
It’s about attacking and being positive — and in my book, nothing would be more positive than giving Stevie or Frank a call.
But I’d be very surprised if anyone at the FA even picks up the phone and dials their numbers.
Source: Soccer - thesun.co.uk