THE Premier League table would look very different if VAR wasn’t in use.
Several fans, players and managers have criticised the use of the technology since it was introduced to England’s top division five years ago.
Wolves boss Gary O’Neil claimed officials have a “subconscious” bias towards the Prem’s top clubs after his team conceded a controversial late goal against Manchester City on Sunday.
He said: “There’s no chance people are purposely against Wolves.
“But is there something in the subconscious around the decision-making, without even knowing it? Are you more likely to give it to Man City than Wolves?
“My senses are heightened when we are facing Man City. Are the officials the same?
Read More in Football
“If I had to upset someone and there’s a big and a little guy, I’m upsetting the little guy.”
Wolves could have been one point better off in the league table had John Stones’ dramatic late winner not been given.
Birmingham World recently investigated how the standings would look if VAR wasn’t used in the Prem.
At the bottom of the table, Wolves and Southampton would be one point better off without the technology.
Most read in Football
FOOTBALL FREE BETS AND SIGN UP DEALS
However, they would both still remain in the relegation zone.
Crystal Palace would also be on two points – one less than they are currently on.
The use of VAR has not majorly affected the likes of Ipswich, West Ham, Leicester and Brentford.
But the findings suggest Everton would have benefited if VAR wasn’t in use.
In arguably the biggest surprise, Bournemouth would be fifth with 15 points without VAR.
The Cherries would be four points better off without the technology.
Liverpool would remain at the top of the table with 21 points – the same total they currently have.
Manchester City would stay in second – but with two points less.
The absence of VAR would not affect the current standings of Arsenal and Aston Villa in third and fourth.
Source: Soccer - thesun.co.uk
